Eustala perfida, Mello-Leitao, 1947
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2017.1388859 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5192132 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF7B879A-FFED-CA45-86BD-EAF2FC7058FA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eustala perfida |
status |
|
Phenology of E. perfida View in CoL
Although we did not record copulas, we found males and females on the same web, probably engaged in reproductive behaviour, in September 2011, August/ September 2012, and July/ August 2013. Some of these couples had the same coloration (green male and female) and others had different coloration (green male, brown female, Figure 4 View Figure 4 (a–c)). In total, we found five egg sacs ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (d)), including one in October and two in December 2012 and one each in January and September 2013. We collected one adult female, which later produced an egg sac in the laboratory ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (e)), but the eggs did not hatch.
The developmental stages presented significant and successive peaks of abundance throughout the year ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 ). Peaks of different age classes occurred in January (spiderlings and young spiders), February (juveniles), April (subadults), and June (adults) ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 , Table 3). Female spiders reached the adult stage earlier than males, with peaks of abundance for subadult females in March, followed by a peak for subadult males in May, adult females in June, and adult males in July ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 , Table 4).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.