Attaphila aptera Bolivar , 1905

Bohn, Horst, Nehring, Volker, G., Jonathan Rodriguez & Klass, Klaus-Dieter, 2021, Revision of the genus Attaphila (Blattodea: Blaberoidea), myrmecophiles living in the mushroom gardens of leaf-cutting ants, Arthropod Systematics & amp; Phylogeny 79, pp. 205-280 : 205

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/asp.79.e67569

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5BE5330D-71CA-4F12-BB2E-C7B29A5C33B2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EDDDF3A6-48CA-54AA-BF1E-F10CC8EDACD8

treatment provided by

Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny by Pensoft

scientific name

Attaphila aptera Bolivar , 1905
status

 

4.1. Attaphila aptera Bolivar, 1905

Figs 1A-C View Figure 1 , 2B, E, F View Figure 2 , 3A, B View Figure 3 (A–J) , 5A, B, J View Figure 5 , 6A-E View Figure 6 , 12A View Figure 12 , 13C View Figure 13 , 14A, I View Figure 14 , 15F-H View Figure 15 , 17C, D, G View Figure 17 , 18A, B View Figure 18 , 19A View Figure 19 , 22A, B View Figure 22 , 24A, B View Figure 24 , 28H View Figure 28 , S1A, B, S2A-C, S3A

Attaphila aptera Bolívar, 1905: 137; Princis 1963: 111.

Material studied.

Type material. Holotype, 1L ♂, Columbien, Esperanza, Dibulla, b. Atta 8-spinosa Reiche (Forel!) (completely on two slides: Bo 1232) (M. Maastricht). - Other material. Panama, Gamboa , IV-VI.2009, leg. V. Nehring, in nest of Acromyrmex octospinosus : 1♂ (completely on one slide: Bo 1224), 1♀ (completely on one slide: Bo 1225) (M. Maastricht, NHMM 2021 001, 002); 1♂ (completely on one slide: Bo 1227), 1♂ (abdomen on slide: Bo 1256, remains for DNA), 1♀ (abdomen on one slide: Bo 1257, remains for DNA), 1L ♂ (head on one slide: Bo 1457), 2L ♂ (each completely on one slide: Bo 1242, Bo 1291), 1L ♂ (head and abdomen on two slides: Bo 1292), 3L ♀ (each completely on one slide: Bo 1243, Bo 1289, Bo 1290) (M. Dresden) . - Panama, Gamboa , IV-VI.2009, leg. V. Nehring, in nest of Acromyrmex echinatior : 1♂ (abdomen, tegmina, and head on three slides: Bo 1252), 1♀ (abdomen and head on two slides: Bo 1253) (ZS Munich) .

Diagnosis.

Male Well characterised by several features unique in Attaphila : the specialisation on T1 involving moderately long bristles (msp1), the bristle distribution on T6,7 with numerous bristles on the surface but none along the posterior border, and the specially shaped virga (with a moderate sinusoidal curvature). Female: Surface bristles of T2-5 dispersed, of T6 numerous, relatively long and strong. Unique among Attaphila species by presence of a lateral gonangulum sclerite (unknown for A. sexdentis ). From A. bergi distinguished by S7 having a median gap in the transversal ridge. A. sexdentis also has numerous, but smaller bristles on T6 and a differently shaped S7.

Description.

Size: Length of body (in alcohol): male 2.81-3.31 mm, female 3.16-3.36 mm. Surface bristles of tergites 2-5 (definition in 2.4.) dispersed, not arranged in transversal rows (Fig. 6A, C, D View Figure 6 ). Transversal ridges tr2-5 without distinct excurvations (Fig. 6A, D View Figure 6 , compare grey arrows in Fig. 11A View Figure 11 , and in Fig. 9B View Figure 9 for male tr2).

Male. Tegmina (Fig. 3A, B View Figure 3 (A–J) ) widest at about 2/3 of length; overall shape roughly triangular; posterior border convex from tegmen base (fwar) onward, its wide curvature very uniform throughout, joining the apical border far apically in a much tighter curvature (also tighter than in A. bergi ); apical border transversal, fairly straight; surface bristles moderately strong. Hindwings fairly rhombic, with obtuse apex (similar to Fig. 1H View Figure 1 ). Glandular pores on T1-5 in the area between the transversal ridge and the anterior border, numerous and tiny, especially densely arranged in median third of tergite (Fig. 5A, B View Figure 5 ). Tergite 1 without long bristles on surface and borders (in contrast to long bristles on T2-5); medially, immediately posteriorly of the transversal ridge tr, with a specialisation (msp1) consisting of a more or less rounded, weakly sclerotised area with two groups of medium-sized bristles pointing anteriorly; on both sides of this area with some much smaller bristles of varying orientation (Figs 5A, B View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 ). Ridge tr1 almost continuous across midline, but more or less weakened and fragmented. Tergite 2 without specialisations. Tergites 6,7: (Figs 13C View Figure 13 , 14I View Figure 14 , 15F, H View Figure 15 (larval)) Median lobe of T7 (definition in 3.6.) very short, but distinct; transversal ridges tr6 and tr7 well developed; posterior borders of T6 and T7 without bristles, surfaces with dispersed bristles of moderate to small size, on T6 larger than on T7, in radiating orientation. Subgenital lobe: (Fig. 24A, B View Figure 24 ) distal part with a deep excavation only along left side; lobe posterior to level of excavation widely tongue-shaped; with two styli, the larger left one (sll) conical, inserted at base of excavation, not reaching tip of lobe, the much smaller right one (slr) knob-like, situated subterminally on right flank of tip; stylus and borders of distal lobe with numerous bristles, most of them of moderate size, some rather long and strong. Phallomeres: (Fig. 24A, B View Figure 24 ) Sclerotised part of hook (h) from the long, wide base (b) very gradually narrowing into a slender, fairly short neck (n; shorter than in A. fungicola ) which is hardly curved and bends almost rectangularly into the slightly wider claw part (cl). Endophallic apodeme (ea) not narrowed at base (forking site of sclerite). Relative to the axis of the endophallic apodeme (ea), the virga (vi) shows a distinct but quite shallow sinusoidal excurvation to the left, its apical part being moderately curved (back into the ea -axis) and gradually narrowed to a rather stout tip; virga longitudinally grooved. Paraprocts: Right paraproct with a sclerotised hook-like projection (hmp in Figs 5J View Figure 5 , 6B View Figure 6 ), left one without a projection.

Female. Tergites 6,7: (Figs 6E View Figure 6 , 12A View Figure 12 , 14A View Figure 14 , 15G View Figure 15 (larval)) Median lobe of T7 rather long; transversal ridges tr6 and tr7 complete, tr6 sublaterally at most with a very weak bend; surface bristles (definition in 2.4.) numerous and rather long and strong; focused to central (= longitudinal and transversal middle) part of surface area (between transversal ridge and posterior border). Subgenital plate (Figs 17C, D View Figure 17 , 18A, B View Figure 18 ) rounded-rectangular, with parallel lateral borders; lateral parts of transversal ridge (sr7-l) in the middle with a shallow, but distinct mesally directed curvation, lateral terminal parts fairly straight; ridge mesally ending shortly after having reached a transversal orientation, with a very wide median gap, partly recurved sr7-m ends indicating the ridge to be at least slightly bisinuate. Genitalia: Spermathecal plate sp large (reaching far to the left), pouch gcp moderately sized (Fig. 19A View Figure 19 ). In laterosternal shelf sclerite (ls in Fig. 22A, B View Figure 22 ) central part (c) moderately long and posteriorly more or less transversally cut, arms (a) moderately wide, wing parts (w) moderately to very wide, their base restricted to posterior half of tubes (blue arrowhead); tubes (lst) slightly curved mesad and slightly narrowed towards the anterior. Lateral and mesal gonangulum sclerites distinct (gg-l, gg-m in Fig. 19A View Figure 19 ).

Host species.

Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich, 1793) ( Bolívar 1905), Acr. echinatior (Forel, 1899).

Distribution.

Panama (Gamboa); Colombia (Dibulla).

Remarks.

Attaphila aptera was described on the basis of a single specimen, a last-stage larval male which Bolívar (1905) interpreted as an adult; the corresponding adult stages were hitherto not known and their identification is problematic due to the scarcity of species-specific characters in larvae. A study of larval characters in four species (see 3.13.) has shown that the bristle patterns of tergites may contribute to an identification of the corresponding imagines: the bristle pattern of male (and female) larvae is very similar to that of the imaginal female.

The type specimen of Attaphila aptera has dispersed bristles on T2-5, thus ruling out the specimens herein classified as A. multisetosa , A. paucisetosa , and A. sinuosocarinata as its conspecifics. The bristles on the surface of T6,7 are numerous and relatively long and strong (Fig. 15H View Figure 15 ), comparable to those observed in larvae and females of A. bergi (Figs 14B View Figure 14 , 15I, J View Figure 15 ) and of the specimens from Gamboa (Panama) found in the nests of Acromyrmex octospinosus and Acr. echinatior (Figs 14A View Figure 14 , 15F, G View Figure 15 ). There is no similarity with the bristle pattern of the remaining four species, which, therefore, can also be eliminated from the list of candidates for conspecifity with the A. aptera type: A. sexdentis has considerably smaller bristles in much higher numbers and density, A. fungicola and A. schuppi have fewer and/or smaller bristles on T6,7. A. flava is only known from the male sex, but the high similarity with the male of A. fungicola justifies the assumption of a corresponding similarity between the females of the two species.

The long distance between the localities of the larval A. aptera type (Colombia) and the localities where A. bergi (Argentina, Uruguay) was found, and the different host species, Acr. octospinosus versus Acr. lundii (which are phylogenetically disjunct: Cristiano et al. 2020; Fig. 27 View Figure 27 ), argue against the assumption that both could belong to the same species. The A. aptera type is much more likely conspecific with (or, at least, most closely related to) the species from Panama: their localities are much closer together and the host species reported for the A. aptera type is among the two host species known for the species from Panama. We did not find a character contradicting the assumption of conspecifity.

Because of the still existing uncertainties it may be seen as premature to assign the specimens from Gamboa to A. aptera . But the possible alternative, to describe them as a new species, appears to be less appropriate. If some day it turns out that the assignment to A. aptera is wrong, the species from Gamboa has to get a new name; if the alternative fails, the system is enriched by a new synonym.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Blattodea

Family

Ectobiidae

Genus

Attaphila

Loc

Attaphila aptera Bolivar , 1905

Bohn, Horst, Nehring, Volker, G., Jonathan Rodriguez & Klass, Klaus-Dieter 2021
2021
Loc

Attaphila aptera

Bolivar 1905
1905