Carpinus betulus ‘ Heterophylla
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.375 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3852871 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC30B96A-FF91-FFDC-5620-8DFBFCAFFBFD |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Carpinus betulus ‘ Heterophylla |
status |
|
1d. Carpinus betulus ‘ Heterophylla View in CoL ’
C. betulus var. heterophylla G.Kirchn., Arboretum Muscaviense : 667 ( Petzold & Kirchner 1864). – C. betulus View in CoL f. heterophylla (G.Kirchn.) K.Koch, Dendrologie 2 (2): 3 ( Koch 1873). – Original citation: No detailed data given. – Type: not localized. – Note: Kirchner gave the name “ heterophylla ” to plants that have both normal-shaped leaves and deeply serrated leaves, regardless whether the leaf serration is of the ‘Incisa’ or ‘Quercifolia’ type, which he regarded as synonymous, as did Koch. As the mutation occurs spontaneously and may be fixed by cuttings, this name ‘Heterophylla’ is complicated to use. Kirchner refers to “Bth. cat.”, meaning the catalogue of James Booth and Söhne nursery in Klein-Flottbek, Hamburg, Germany. As there is no reference to Loudon, Kirchner’s name cannot be regarded as a clear recombination of C. betulus var. heterophylla hort. ex Loudon , which is an invalid name published as a synonym of C. betulus View in CoL ‘Quercifolia’. Therefore, Kirchner’s name is not illegitimate, but rather a later homonym.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |