Stomias danae Ege, 1933
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-2022-0004 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12720252 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EC2487AA-EA2D-C525-6424-FB1DFBA456F5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Stomias danae Ege, 1933 |
status |
|
Stomias danae Ege, 1933 View in CoL
( Fig. 11A View FIGURE 11 )
Diagnosis. Stomias danae differs from congeners by the chin barbel stem with 2 filaments at base; terminal bulb of chin barbel without filaments; palatine with 2 teeth; 16–18 dorsal-fin rays; 20–21 anal-fin rays; six rows of hexagonal cells dorsal to lateral series of photophores; one photophore per hexagon cell in the upper two rows, usually 2–3 in the third row, and usually 3–5 in the fourth and fifth rows; total vertebrae 60–62 (Morrow, 1964d; Gibbs, 1969; Shcherbachev, Novikova, 1976).
Geographical distribution. Known from a few records in the western South Atlantic, western Indian and central Pacific oceans ( Gibbs , 1969; Clarke , 1974; Shcherbachev , Novikova , 1976; Mundy , 2005). In the western South Atlantic , the species is known from one record off Trindade and Martin Vaz Archipelago ( Brazil), and two records off northeastern Brazil, outside the country’s EEZ ( Shcherbachev , Novikova , 1976; Gibbs , 1969; Menezes et al., 2003; Judkins , Haedrich , 2018). Stomias danae is reported here based on one specimen collected off Paraíba State, at 800 m depth ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ) .
Specimen examined. 1. NPM 4768, 1 (95 mm), AB2#21.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.