Aresconini, Viggiani, 1988
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.12892 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6201DACE-9900-4A2F-92C9-D3014851100D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB332434-17E1-5FAC-7478-692D93C5F61B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Aresconini |
status |
|
Tribe Aresconini
Notes.
Viggiani (1988) proposed Aresconini for Arescon Walker and defined the tribe on the characteristic male genitalia, i.e., encapsulated, with relatively long, narrow parameres but apparently no digiti. Based on mainly extant genera and species, Aresconini is defined by the following features: mandible with 4 teeth; pronotum entire; venation long but postmarginal vein usually short; funicle in females 4-, 5- or 8-segmented; clava entire or 2-segmented; male genitalia usually with long parallel-sided parameres. I classify members of the extant genera Kikiki Huber and Beardsley ( Huber and Beardsley 2000), Tinkerbella Huber & Noyes (Huber & Noyes 2013), Proarescon (this paper), and the extinct genus Myanmymar ( Poinar and Huber 2011) in the tribe based on similarities in head features, fore wing shape or venation, and male genitalia where known.
Arescon is almost worldwide ( Triapitsyn 2016) whereas Proarescon is only in southeastern Asia. Lin et al. (2007) and Huber (2009) had first classified Kikiki in the Alaptus group of genera then, with Tinkerbella described as a separate genus ( Huber and Noyes 2013), in the Anagrus group of genera. In both cases, similarities in various features were used to justify their placement. Now, however, I believe these two genera are best classified in Aresconini . The male genitalia of Kikiki have fairly long and thick parameres ( Huber and Noyes 2013, fig. 35), the vertex has a distinct stemmaticum ( Huber and Noyes 2013, figs 12, 41), the fore wing has a long venation, and the mandible has 4 teeth, all features that occur also in Arescon and Proarescon . Kikiki may be almost worldwide (Australia, India, northern South America, Hawaiian Islands) and Tinkerbella is so far known only from Costa Rica ( Huber and Noyes 2013). Enneagmus may fit in Aresconini better than in Triadomerini because of its apparently short venation, and 4-segmented funicle and 3-segmented tarsi as in Kikiki . The 3-segmented clava may simply be an ancestral feature, reduced to two segments in Kikiki and Tinkerbella . However, the short venation, apparently much less than half the wing length is unlike the other genera in Aresconini . Thus, six genera are here classified in Aresconini : Arescon , Enneagmus , Kikiki , Myanmymar , Proarescon , and Tinkerbella . If Minutoma Kaddumi ( Kaddumi 2005) is indeed a mymarid, it may also belong here; its small body length is comparable to that of Tinkerbella .
Key to extant genera of Aresconini and Triadomerini . Females.
See Poinar and Huber (2011) for key to the extinct Cretaceous genera.
1 | Clava 2 or 3-segmented; propodeum with 2 or 3 setae | 2 |
- | Clava 1-segmented (i.e., entire); propodeum with 1 seta | 5 |
2(1) | Clava 2-segmented | 3 |
- | Clava 3-segmented [ovipositor extending anteriorly well under mesosoma but not exserted posteriorly much beyond gastral apex (Figs 105 View Figures 104–107 , 126 View Figures 126, 127 )] | Neotriadomerus Huber, gen. n. |
3(2) | Ovipositor extending posteriorly well beyond posterior apex of gaster (Figs 2 View Figures 1–3 , 4 View Figures 4–7 ); tarsi 5-segmented; funicle 8-segmented | Eustochomorpha haeckeli Girault |
- | Ovipositor not or barely exserted beyond posterior apex of gaster; tarsi 3- or 4-segmented; funicle 4- or 5-segmented | 4 |
4(3) | Tarsi 4-segmented; funicle 5-segmented | Tinkerbella Huber & Noyes |
- | Tarsi 3-segmented; funicle 4-segmented | Kikiki Huber & Beardsley |
5(1) | Funicle 5-segmented | Arescon Walker |
- | Funicle 8-segmented | 6 |
6(5) | Fl1-fl5 each much shorter than fl6-fl8 (Fig. 166 View Figures 165–167 ) | Proarescon Huber, gen. n. |
- | Fl1-fl5 as long as fl6-fl8 ( Huber 2002, figs 2, 4) | Borneomymar Huber |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.