Epicadus stelloides ( Walckenaer, 1837 ), 2021

Machado, Miguel, Viecelli, Rafaela, Guzati, Catherine, Grismado, Cristian J. & Teixeira, Renato A., 2021, Kryptochroma: a new genus of bark-dwelling crab spiders (Araneae, Thomisidae), European Journal of Taxonomy 778, pp. 26-70 : 66

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.778.1565

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4AFEC628-D555-44BD-8592-3A338694885F

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB2A87E5-FFFC-FFF0-1F80-3BDFFC7CFA68

treatment provided by

Felipe (2021-11-09 18:24:47, last updated by Valdenar 2021-11-09 19:59:58)

scientific name

Epicadus stelloides ( Walckenaer, 1837 )
status

comb. nov.

Epicadus stelloides ( Walckenaer, 1837) comb. nov.

Thomisus stelloides Walckenaer, 1837: 514 (female holotype from “Ilê Tortue”, Tortuga, Haiti, deposited in MNHN, probably lost).

Stephanopis trilobata Mello-Leitão, 1929: 56 , fig. 136 (female holotype collected in Goiás, Brazil, deposited in MNHN 21629, examined; female “cotype”, collected in Goiás, Brazil, deposited in MNHN 21628, examined). syn. nov. ( Fig. 27E–F).

Stephanopis salobrensis Mello-Leitão, 1929: 57 , figs 137–139 (2 females paralectotypes, misidentified; 1 male lectotype designated here, collected from Salobro, Bahia, Brazil, deposited in MNHN 3973, examined). syn. nov. ( Fig. 26).

Stephanopis stelloides – Keyserling 1880: 173 (female cotype collected from “Tortosa” by Guérin- Meneville, not located). syn. nov. ( Fig. 27C–D).

Note

Although the holotype described by Walckenaer (1837) is presumably lost, and the “conspecific” and sympatric specimen used by Keyserling (1880) to describe S. stelloides had not been found, the original descriptions and illustrations ( Fig. 27C–D) allowed us to unequivocally identify this species as conspecific with Epicadus caudatus ( Fig. 27A–B), a species that was recently examined and revised by Machado et al. (2015, 2017). Following the priority principle, we transfer Stephanopis stelloides to Epicadus and propose the name E. stelloides comb. nov. as a senior synonym over E. caudatus ( Fig. 27). Thus, based on the images provided by Machado et al. (2015), we also recognize the identity of the male specimen of S. salobrensis as conspecific to E. stelloides comb. nov.

Keyserling E. 1880. Die Spinnen Amerikas, I. Laterigradae. Bauer and Raspe (E. Kuster), Nurnberg. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 44813

Machado M., Teixeira R. A. & Lise A. A. 2015. Taxonomic notes on the crab spider genus Tobias Simon, 1895 (Araneae, Thomisidae, Stephanopinae). Zootaxa 4034: 565 - 576. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4034.3.8

Machado M., Teixeira R. A. & Lise A. A. 2017. Cladistic analysis supports the monophyly of the Neotropical crab spider genus Epicadus and its senior synonymy over Tobias (Araneae: Thomisidae). Invertebrate Systematics 31: 442 - 455. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IS 16074

Mello-Leitao C. F. 1929. Aphantochilidas e Thomisidas do Brasil. Archivos do Museu Nacional do Rio de Janeiro 31: 1 - 359.

Walckenaer C. A. 1837. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Apteres. Tome premier. Roret, Paris. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 61095

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Thomisidae

Genus

Epicadus