Axiopsis serratifrons (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24199/j.mmv.2009.66.20 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E74287C8-3D7F-8D23-665F-FC78FD54FE84 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Axiopsis serratifrons (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873 ) |
status |
|
Axiopsis serratifrons (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873) View in CoL
Limited synonymy. Axia [sic.] serratifrons A. Milne-Edwards, 1873: 263 , pl. 13.
Axiopsis (Axiopsis) serratifrons View in CoL . — De Man, 1925b: 68, 72–80, pl. 6 figs. 12–12i.
Axiopsis serratifrons View in CoL . — Sakai and de Saint Laurent, 1989: 76–77.—Ngoc-Ho, 2005: 53, fig. 3.— Komai and Tachikawa, 2008: 20–22, fig. 1 (synonyms).
? Axiopsis (Axiopsis) consobrina View in CoL . — Poore and Griffin, 1979: 230–232, fig. 4.
Distribution. Indo-West Pacific, Caribbean, Brazil; Qld, Gulf of Carpentaria.
Remarks. Milne-Edwards (1873) reported his species from Upolu, Samoa (specimen now in Zoological Museum, Hamburg) and Hawaii (specimen now in Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris), the latter being assumed by some to be the type locality ( Kensley, 1981; Sakai and de Saint Laurent, 1989). De Man (1925b) described the “cotype” from Upolu and illustrated marked tuberculation on the lateral face of the propodus of the cheliped. Ngoc-Ho (2005) redescribed what she called the “ holotype ” from Hawaii with this face being smooth. It is possible that more than one species is involved which is significant because the species has been reported many times and has at least two synonyms ( Kensley, 1981; Sakai and de Saint Laurent, 1989; Komai and Tachikawa, 2008). No lectotype has been selected and Ngoc-Ho’s use of “ holotype ” does not constitute lectotype designation (ICZN 74.7).
The Australian record of A. consobrina ( Poore and Griffin, 1979) is another species (M. de Saint Laurent, pers. comm., 1990), potentially A. serratifrons . The material has not been re-examined for this study. Until the identity (or identities) of this widespread species is decided, A. serratifrons is best distinguished from other Australian species of Axiopsis by the absence of a spine on the upper margin of the merus and the numerous tubercles that ornament the space between the denticulate median and submedian gastric carinae.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Axiopsis serratifrons (A. Milne-Edwards, 1873 )
Poore, Gary C. B. & Collins, David J. 2009 |
Axiopsis serratifrons
Komai, T. & Tachikawa, H. 2008: 20 |
Sakai, K. & de Saint Laurent, M. 1989: 76 |
Axiopsis (Axiopsis) consobrina
Poore, G. C. B. & Griffin, D. J. G. 1979: 230 |
Axiopsis (Axiopsis) serratifrons
De Man, J. G. 1925: 68 |