Anolis lemurinus Cope, 1861
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v14i4.57765 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:04B277A5-7E70-4E06-82C5-174C5016B74B |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E6EB7EE3-D6EA-5011-A01C-0105A36A2ABE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Anolis lemurinus Cope, 1861 |
status |
|
Anolis lemurinus Cope, 1861 View in CoL
Distribution.
Occurs on the Atlantic coast from central Veracruz to central Panama, and on the Pacific coast from Costa Rica to central Panama.
Samples.
RCMX214 (male*), RCMX225 (male*) Estación Chajul, Selva Lacandona, Montes Azules, Chiapas, Mexico.
DNA taxonomy.
BLAST analysis of the 630-bp MT-ND2 gene sequences from both individuals show 99.5% - 100% of identity with a sequence of A. lemurinus from Oaxaca (GenBank KT724761).
Chromosomes.
No previous chromosomal data are available for A. lemurinus and its karyotype is here described for the first time. Both male specimens from Montes Azules have a 2n = 40 (24M + 16m) karyotype (Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ). The 12 pairs of macrochromosomes include eight pairs of submetacentric and four pairs of subtelocentric/acrocentric chromosomes. The metacentric chromosomes of pair 10 are of different size and may represent heteromorphic sex chromosomes of the XY type.
This karyotype has the same composition in micro- and macrochromosomes as all Anolis species with 2n = 40 so far described. Molecular phylogenetics ( Poe et al. 2017) place A. lemurinus nested within a clade in which all the species so far karyotyped show 2n = 40 ( Castiglia et al. 2013b). Ancestral state analysis ( Castiglia et al. 2013b) indicates that the 2n = 40 karyotype is derived from by five centric fissions of macrochromosomes from an ancestral 2n = 30. What that should be further investigated are the chromosomal rearrangements occurring within macrochromosomes in the 2n = 40 karyotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.