Ichneumonopsis burmensis, Hardy, 1973
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5351662 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E667AD0F-FF8A-CA2B-303C-FB245592F42D |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Ichneumonopsis burmensis |
status |
|
Comparison of I. burmensis View in CoL larvae with other Gastrozonini
and Tephritidae View in CoL . — So far, larvae of four Gastrozonini species have been described ( Elson-Harris, 1992): Chaetellipsis atrata Hardy, 1973 View in CoL (= Chaetellipsis paradoxa, Bezzi View in CoL ), Chaetellipsis sp. (= C. maculosa Hancock & Drew View in CoL ; D. Hancock, pers. com.), Gastrozona fasciventris (Macquart) View in CoL and Taeniostola limbata Hendel View in CoL (= Cyrtostola limbata , see Hancock & Drew 1999). The main characters of the Gastrozonini larvae described by Elson-Harris (1992) and of I. burmensis View in CoL are compared in Table 1. Elson-Harris explicitly described the stomal organ, facial mask, anterior spiracle, and anal lobes of each species. The data entries in Table 1 for labial lobes, antenna, maxillary organ, pad organ, oral lobe, and paired sensilla are based on our interpretation of her SEM figures.
The facial mask of I. burmensis View in CoL broadly flanks the mouth laterally and extends to the antennal and maxillary sensory organs. It mainly consists of accessory plates. Oral ridges are reduced, non-dentate and cover just a narrow area along the preoral cavity. In Gastrozonini larvae described by Elson- Harris (1992), the facial mask is more or less triangular, confined to the lateral mouth area and consists mainly of dentate oral ridges. In some species a few accessory plates are present at the apices of the oral ridges.
The labial lobe of I. burmensis is covered with strong spines and bears a paired labial organ. Both of these features are unusual, and perhaps unique, among tephritid larvae described to date. The Gastrozononi studied by Elson-Harris (1992) possess a bare labial lobe.
The antenna of I. burmensis is two-segmented, the antennae of Gastrozonini described by Elson-Harris (1992) are 3- segmented. The maxillary sense organ of I. burmensis and other Gastrozonini is similar. It consists of two sensilla groups: a group with two papilla sensilla (one of them larger) and a group with three papilla sensilla and a peg or peg-like sensillum. The stomal organ of I. burmensis and other Gastrozonini is also similar, containing at least one pit sensillum and several peg-like sensilla.
There are 2 pairs of pad organs in I. burmensis (one posterior to the cephalic lobes, one at posteroventral corner of the oral ridge region). Pad organs are also present in other Gastrozonini (not studied in detail) and seem to be widely distributed in Tephritidae . In Anastrepha ludens there are 5 pairs of pad organs (Carroll & Wharton, 1989), and in Ceratitis rosa , 6 pairs ( Carroll, 1998), all arranged in similar positions.
A laterally flattened oral lobe, which is perhaps homologous with the oral lobe of Headrick & Goeden (1990), protrudes between the mouth hooks in I. burmensis . In other Gastrozonini an oral lobe or paired oral lobes are also present (Elson-Harris, 1999).
The most striking morphological character of I. burmensis larvae is the large and strongly ramified anterior spiracle ( Figs. 28 View Figs , 34, 35 View Figs ), with some 100 comparatively flat papillae. Tephritids (and other Acalyptratae) usually possess tube-like papillae (tubules) arranged in a fan-like row. In Tephritidae the anterior spiracles possess in general 2–20 tubules; in relatively large bodied species there may be more, for example, in some Rhagoletis , Anastrepha and also in Strauzia ( Phillips, 1946; Steck et al., 1990). Frías et al. (2006) observed up to 27 tubules in Toxotr y pana. In the Gastrozonini studied so far (Elson-Harrison, 1992) the anterior spiracles are fan-like and possess 13–36 tubules arranged in 1–3 rows ( Table 1).
A conspicuous character of I. burmensis larvae is the paired sensilla located on the prothorax ( Figs. 34, 36, 37 View Figs , pts 1–10). They consist of a pit sensillum and a papilla sensillum (or maybe a peg sensillum with an obscured peg). In other Gastrozonini from our collection we have only found single sensilla on the prothorax. Paired sensilla similar to those found in I. burmensis also occur on the labial lobe of Anastrepha ludens (Carroll & Wharton, 1989, Fig. 42 View Figs ).
Other differences between I. burmensis and other Gastrozonini studied by Elson-Harris (1992) include the shape of the spinules of the creeping welt (apex of spinules truncated in I. burmensis , pointed in other Gastrozonini ), the anal lobes (absent in I. burmensis , present in other Gastrozonini ). Additionally, we have noted that a caudal ridge is absent in I. burmensis , but present in most other Gastrozonini in our possession.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ichneumonopsis burmensis
Kovac, Damir, Freidberg, Amnon & Steck, Gary J. 2013 |
C. maculosa
Hancock & Drew 1999 |
Chaetellipsis atrata
Hardy 1973 |
I. burmensis
Hardy 1973 |
I. burmensis
Hardy 1973 |
Taeniostola limbata
Hendel 1915 |