Tetranychus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/acarologia/20122038 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E32A879B-FFA9-7F3A-FA8A-FCFAFD5BF8D4 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Tetranychus |
status |
|
Paedogenesis in Tetranychus View in CoL View at ENA and actinotrichid mites
Identifying the last stase in Tetranychus as a tritonymph implies that it is paedogenetic. Is this acceptable? Paedogenesis in actinotrichid mites has been reported in various groups, in Podapolipidae by Volkonsky (1940), Pyemotidae by Rack (1972), Tenuipalpidae by Baker (1979) and Cheyletidae by Atyeo et al. (1984). The penultimate case is of special interest as Tenuipalpidae are part of Tetranychoidea. The missing link is however provided by Ochoa (1989) who reported paedogenetic tritonymphs coexisting with imaginal females in Tuckerella knorri . This particular ontogeny is summarized in Fig. 1G View FIGURE and links ontogenies A (usually observed in Tuckerellidae, Beard and Walter, 2005 ) and H (that of T. urticae ). A second intermediate case is provided by Tuckerella saetula and T. cf. pavoniformis in which the male directly emerges from the deutonymph (Beard and Ochoa, 2010).
In the context of the stase theory, Hammen (1975) called alassostasy the variations in the number of stases and the process of loosing a stase during the ontogeny was named meristasy by AndrØ (1988). The ontogeny in Tetranychidae is thus characterized by the meristasy of the imaginal stase.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.