Panjange kubah Huber
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.184 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC6509DC-B848-4645-BCD9-35BF0BE263F1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF978A33-4706-4705-8245-86776DB7E34C |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:CF978A33-4706-4705-8245-86776DB7E34C |
|
treatment provided by |
Jeremy |
|
scientific name |
Panjange kubah Huber |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Panjange kubah Huber , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:CF978A33-4706-4705-8245-86776DB7E34C
Figs 6, 63–64, 69–81, 89–91
Panjange Bor 109: Huber & Nuñeza 2015: 5, 43–44.
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most congeners by distinctive transversal sclerite on procursus ( Fig. 70); from very similar Pa. seowi sp. nov. by other details of procursus (unique prolateral process, Figs 69, 77–78; distal element longer, Fig. 70; absence of prolateral ridges on procursus, Fig. 69). Females are easily distinguished from Pa. nigrifrons by short scape but difFcult to distinguish externally from other congeners in Sarawak (distinctive shape of pore plates and pair of median sclerites; similar only in Pa. seowi sp. nov.).
Etymology
Named for the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: holotype, Ƌ, Sarawak, National Park, along Waterfall Trail ( 1.596– 1.606° N, 110.180–110.187° E), 200–300 m a.s.l., 12 Jul. 2014 ( B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber), ZFMK ( Ar 14586 ) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
MALAYSIA-BORNEO, Sarawak: 2 ƋƋ, 7 ♀♀, same data as holotype, ZFMK ( Ar 14587-88 ) GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, 2 juvs, same data, in absolute ethanol, ZFMK ( Bor 189 ) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male ( holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 4.5, carapace width 1.2. Leg 1: 42.0 (9.3 + 0.5 + 9.6 + 20.1 + 2.5), tibia 2: 6.1, tibia 3: 3.6, tibia 4: 5.6; tibia 1 L/d: 99. Distance PME-PME 445 µm, diameter PME 105 µm, distance PME–ALE ~45 µm; AME absent.
COLOR. Carapace pale ochre yellow to whitish, posterior mark ( Fig. 63) lost in ethanol, ocular area and clypeus dark brown (black in life), without black marks in AME area; sternum whitish; legs ochreorange with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray, with black marks dorsally, monochromous ventrally.
BODY. Habitus as in Figs 63–64; ocular area raised, each triad on medium long stalk, without pointed process (cf. Fig. 6); carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodiFed; sternum wider than long (0.75/0.60), unmodiFed.
CHELICERAE. Similar to close relatives, with proximal pair of processes and distinctively bipartite distal apophyses ( Fig. 71); without modiFed hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 69–70; coxa unmodiFed; trochanter with slightly curved pointed retrolatero-ventral apophysis; femur with curved Fnger-shaped ventral apophysis; procursus with row of about 17 ventral ridges, with distinctive transversal sclerite and long prolateral process close to large Fat distal element ( Figs 77–78), with two distinct spiny processes in distal pit ( Fig. 80); bulb with strong proximal sclerite, slightly curved appendix, and long partly sclerotized embolus with distinct distal fringes ( Figs 74–75).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with many pseudosegments but only ~10 distally visible in dissecting microscope.
Variation
Tibia 1 in 2 other males: 9.1, 9.3. One male with irregular black marks in AME area ( Fig. 6).
Female
In general similar to male but eye triads on low humps, much closer together (distance PME – PME 230 µm). Tibia 1 in 6 females: 6.9–7.9 (mean 7.4). Epigynum weakly sclerotized plate with variably large and variably sclerotized posterior ‘knob’ ( Figs 72, 76, 89), internal arch and complex transversal folds visible through cuticle; internal genitalia as in Figs 73, 90–91.
Natural history
Most specimens were found in a very limited area close to a waterfall. The domed webs had a diameter of about 15–20 cm and in each case the apex of the dome was attached to the underside of a leaf where the spider rested.
Distribution
Known from type locality in Sarawak only ( Fig. 1).
| ZFMK |
Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig" |
| AME |
USA, Florida, Gainesville, University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, Allyn Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
