Diastolinus perforatus Leng and Mutchler, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-70.3.485 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6968224 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E0146C34-8A22-FFF0-F8D1-C72BFDA5FC62 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Diastolinus perforatus Leng and Mutchler, 1914 |
status |
|
Diastolinus perforatus Leng and Mutchler, 1914 (not Sahlberg, 1823)
Diastolinus perforatus (not Sahlberg, 1823); Leng and Mutchler 1914: 460 (in part, Martinique records only); Gebien 1938: 294 [413] (in part, Martinique records only); Blackwelder 1945: 524 (in part, Martinique records only); Marcuzzi 1957:128 (in part, Martinique records only). 1984: 78 (in part Martinique records only); Peck 2011a: 33 (in part, Martinique records only), 2011b: 29 (in part, Martinique records only), 2016: 160 (in part, Martinique records only); Peck et al. 2014: 84 (in part, Martinique records only); Soldati and Touroult 2014: 99 (in part, Martinique records only).
Diastolinus hummelincki Marcuzzi 1962: 29 (in part, Martinique records only).
Diastolinus mulsanti Marcuzzi and D’ Aguilar 1971:79 (in part, Martinique records only); Marcuzzi 1977: 19 (in part, Martinique records only), 1984: 77 (in part, Martinique records only), 2001: 251 (in part, Martinique? records only); Peck 2011b: 29 (in part, Martinique records only), 2016: 159 (in part, Martinique? records only); Soldati and Touroult 2014: 99 (in part, Martinique records only).
Discussion. The records above apparently all refer to a single Martinique specimen, which we have not found. The identity of this specimen is unknown at this time, thus it is placed incertae sedis. In spite of three species names being involved, there is only a single record here.
We can trace the record to Leng and Mutchler (1914), but no voucher has been found. It may originate earlier, but we have been unable to find it. In 1957, Marcuzzi did not cite a specimen for his Martinique record of D. perforatus in his table. In 1962, he dropped the D. perforatus record for Martinique, rather moving it to D. hummelincki with a “?” In 1977, D. hummelincki was replaced with D. mulsanti , and the Martinique record retained. Lastly, in 1984, the Martinique record for D. perforatus was reinstated by Marcuzzi, apparently forgetting he moved it to D. hummelincki / mulsanti , which was also retained. Peck (2011b, 2016) listed it twice, under two names, without understanding the records.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Diastolinus perforatus Leng and Mutchler, 1914
Hart, Charles J. & Ivie, Michael A. 2016 |
Diastolinus mulsanti Marcuzzi and D’ Aguilar 1971:79
Peck, S. B. 2016: 159 |
Soldati, L. & J. Touroult 2014: 99 |
Peck, S. B. 2011: 29 |
Marcuzzi, G. 2001: 251 |
Marcuzzi, G. 1984: 77 |
Marcuzzi, G. 1977: 19 |
Marcuzzi, G. 1971: 79 |
Diastolinus hummelincki
Marcuzzi 1962: 29 |
Diastolinus perforatus
Peck, S. B. 2016: 160 |
Peck, S. B., M. C. Thomas, & R. H. Turnbow 2014: 84 |
Soldati, L. & J. Touroult 2014: 99 |
Peck, S. B. 2011: 33 |
Peck, S. B. 2011: 29 |
Marcuzzi, G. 1984: 78 |
Marcuzzi, G. 1957: 128 |
Blackwelder, R. E. 1945: 524 |
Gebien, H. 1938: 294 |
Leng, C. W. & A. J. Mutchler 1914: 460 |