Rhaconotus formosanus Watanabe, 1934
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4881.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D65E1CD8-85A6-4723-943C-F4F6C268ECFD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4426528 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE6A87CB-FFC2-FC05-FF7E-FB6BFB12F8EE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhaconotus formosanus Watanabe, 1934 |
status |
|
11. Rhaconotus formosanus Watanabe, 1934 View in CoL
Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14
Rhaconotus formosanus Watanabe, 1934: 119 View in CoL ; Shenefelt & Marsh 1976: 1337; Belokobylskij 1998: 69; Belokobylskij & Chen, 2004a: 354; Belokobylskij & Maeto, 2009: 422; Yu et al., 2016.
Material examined. 1♀, NE China, Liaoning Province, Kuandian County, Daxicha Forest , 28.VII.2009, N40°44′58″, E125°11′35″, 446 m GoogleMaps altitude, Tang Yan-Long; 1♀, id., but 25.VI.2009.
Hosts. Parasitoid of Massicus raddei (new record).
Distribution. China (Fujian, Hainan, Hubei, Jilin, Liaoning, Taiwan, Yunnan, Zhejiang), Australia, Caroline Islands, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Russia, Vietnam.
Remarks. Body length ♀ 3.2–3.6 mm. According to the holotype’s figures provided by National Natural Sci-ence Museum of Taiwan (2019), Watanabe’s original description ( Watanabe 1934), the key to this genus for China ( Belokobylskij & Chen 2004a) and detailed redescription of Japanese specimens ( Belokobylskij & Maeto 2009), our specimens from Liaoning belong to R. formosanus . Nevertheless, there are some minor differences, e.g., frons and vertex black, face and gena dark brown ( Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 A-C) (vs. frons, vertex, face and gena entirely yellow in holotype); ovipositor sheath 0.7 times as long as metasoma ( Fig. 14A View FIGURE 14 ) (vs. ovipositor sheath 0.9 × as long as metasoma in holotype); medio-longitudinal carina of propodeum 0.4 × as long as median length of propodeum ( Fig. 14D View FIGURE 14 ) (vs. medio-longitudinal carina of propodeum 0.2 times as long as median length of propodeum in holotype ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 of Watanabe 1934)), but we consider the differences to be part of intraspecific variation in R. formosanus . Only two females have been collected, which indicates that it is an occasional parasitoid of M. raddei .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhaconotus formosanus Watanabe, 1934
Cao, Liang-Ming, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Tang, Yan-Long, Wang, Xiao-Yi & Yang, Zhong- Qi 2020 |
Rhaconotus formosanus
Belokobylskij, S. A. & Maeto, K. 2009: 422 |
Belokobylskij, S. A. & Chen, X. X. 2004: 354 |
Belokobylskij, S. A. 1998: 69 |
Shenefelt, R. D. & Marsh, P. M. 1976: 1337 |
Watanabe, C. 1934: 119 |