Uromys caudimaculatus papuanus (Ramsay, 1883)

Groves, C. P. & Flannery, Tim F., 1994, A revision of the genus Uromys Peters, 1867 (Muridae: Mammalia) with descriptions of two new species, Records of the Australian Museum 46 (2), pp. 145-169 : 153

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3853/j.0067-1975.46.1994.12

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4659328

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DD3387EC-FFD1-665B-77AB-3E97F8E0FB0A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Uromys caudimaculatus papuanus (Ramsay, 1883)
status

 

Uromys caudimaculatus papuanus (Ramsay, 1883)

(not preoccupied by papuanus von Meyer, 1876, a nomen nudum)

Synonyms. Uromys prolixus Thomas,1913 1913 View in CoL ;U. TODO ductor Thomas, 1913 View in CoL ; U lamington Troughton,1937 1937 View in CoL .

Type material. HOLOTYPE. A search of the collections of the Australian and Macleay Museums, Sydney has failed to reveal the existence of this specimen, and we suspect that it has been lost. The type locality is given as Port Moresby or the lower slopes of the Astrolabe Range.

Revised diagnosis. Distinguished from other subspecies as follows; i) hindfoot long (21-24% ofhead and body length); ii) tail averaging longer (110-135% of head and body length); iii) size small (condylobasal length 56-64 mm; head and body length 250-288 mm, see Table 1 View Table 1 ); iv) feet buffy or brown; v) tail (which is partly white for over half of its length) strongly mottled with brown coalescing spots on its terminal portion, and scales not arranged in such clear rings; vi) underside creamy, smudged in grey; vii) frontals flat; viii) bulla more rounded.

Discussion. The Discriminant Analysis ( Fig. 4 View Fig ) reveals considerable diversity within this subspecies, but it is difficult to see how it could be split up with two exceptions: i) Yapsiei (two specimens): in the Discriminant Analysis, these specimens resemble nominotypical U. c. caudimaculatus . Univariate analysis reveals that the hindfoot is relatively long (24-25% of head and body length) and the ear markedly so in one of the specimens (44 and 58% of condylobasal length in the two specimens); ii) Mount Karimui (two specimens): these are distinguished from all other samples in the Discriminant Analysis. Univariate analysis reveals a small body size (mean condylobasal length 54.6 mm, head and body 232.5 mm).

We feel that either of these populations may eventually be shown to be distinct, but given the small sample size it would be rash to recognise them as such at present.

Distribution. This subspecies is distributed throughout the mainland of Papua New Guinea, except for the trans-Fly plains and the Gulf of Papua, where it is replaced by the nominate race.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Mammalia

Order

Rodentia

Family

Muridae

Genus

Uromys

Loc

Uromys caudimaculatus papuanus (Ramsay, 1883)

Groves, C. P. & Flannery, Tim F. 1994
1994
Loc

U lamington

Troughton 1937
1937
Loc

Uromys prolixus

Thomas 1913
1913
Loc

ductor

Thomas 1913
1913
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF