Rectarcturus kophameli (Ohlin, 1901)
publication ID |
1464-5262 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC5987CB-8F5C-AE7A-3264-FBFCFC4BBC83 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rectarcturus kophameli (Ohlin, 1901) |
status |
|
Rectarcturus kophameli (Ohlin, 1901) View in CoL
Arcturus Kophameli Ohlin, 1901: 272–273 View in CoL , pl. 20 figure 5.
‘ Microarcturus ’ kophameli: Nordenstam, 1933: 128 View in CoL .
Rectarcturus kophameli: Schultz, 1981: 68 View in CoL ; Park and Wägele, 1995: 71–75, figures 9–12.
Remarks
Nordenstam (1933) listed this as a member of Microarcturus . Park and Wägele (1995) redescribed the holotype female and discussed the differences between Rectarcturus Schultz, 1981 , of which this is the type species, and Neoarcturus . Unfortunately their discussion treated species of Neoarcturus , Austroarcturus and Fissarcturus synonymously. They realized the differences between Brandt’s (1990) species (referred here to Fissarcturus ) and holidoteids (see discussion under Neoarcturus above), and that Rectarcturus is closer to Fissarcturus than to Neoarcturus s. s. Significant differences are that the groove on the male pleopod 1 endopod opens distolaterally in Rectarcturus (not laterally as in Fissarcturus ), there are no paired pleotelsonic spines, pereopods 5–7 lack robust setae on the posterior margin of carpus and propodus, and the unguis of pereopods 2–4 is shorter than the body of this article (longer and setiform in Fissarcturus ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rectarcturus kophameli (Ohlin, 1901)
Poore, G. C. B. 2003 |
Microarcturus
Poore 2003 |
Rectarcturus kophameli:
Schultz 1981: 68 |
kophameli:
Nordenstam 1933: 128 |
Arcturus
Kophameli Ohlin 1901: 272 - 273 |