Amaurochaete comata G. Lister & Brândză, J. Bot., Lond.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.344.2.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC192B38-FFB3-3D5F-E7A0-AD9DDDE7F921 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Amaurochaete comata G. Lister & Brândză, J. Bot., Lond. |
status |
|
Amaurochaete comata G. Lister & Brândză, J. Bot., Lond. View in CoL 64: 225 (1926)
≡ Lachnobolus comatus (G. Lister & Brândză) Lado, Cuadernos de Trabajo View in CoL de Flora Micológica Ibérica (Madrid) 16: 49 (2001)
Type:— ROMANIA, Neamt, on living bark, September 1925, Dr. M. Brândză, BM 4043 [ BM 001089979 = box, BM 001247193 = slide, BM 001247201 = SEM stub].
This species was described by G. Lister (1926) based on specimens sent by M. Brândză from the historic region of Moldavia (Neamt, Moldova Region, today part of Romania) on trunks of Abies pectinata where this species often fructifies. Martin & Alexopoulos (1969) described this species as from M. Brândză 95 deposited in IA (currently BPI 805742). These authors revise the measurements of the original plate in the publication by Lister (1926) and indicate that spores measures should be 13–14 (–14.5) μm instead of 11–12 μm in diameter. In specimens deposited in the box labeled as BM 4043 the average spore dimensions was found as 12.5 × 12 μm with a minimum of 11 μm, thereby confirming the lower limit as observed by Lister and the maximum of 13.7 μm, close to that observed by Martin & Alexopoulus (1969). This result highights the importance of a sufficient and defined sample size in order to avoid a too narrow or biased understanding of the variation in spore size even within a single sporocarp.
M |
Botanische Staatssammlung München |
BM |
Bristol Museum |
G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
IA |
University of Iowa |
BPI |
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amaurochaete comata G. Lister & Brândză, J. Bot., Lond.
Moreno, G., Castillo, A. & Thüs, H. 2018 |
Lachnobolus comatus (G. Lister & Brândză)
Lado 2001: 49 |
Amaurochaete comata G. Lister & Brândză, J. Bot., Lond.
Brandza 1926: 225 |