Melitaea phoebe var. uralensis, Krulikovsky, 1897

Russell, Peter J. C., Lukhtanov, Vladimir A. & Tennent, W. John, 2022, Reassessment of the status of some European and Asian Melitaea taxa described as subspecies of Melitaea phoebe ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), with designations of lectotypes where appropriate (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), Zootaxa 5141 (1), pp. 25-38 : 28

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1B8B140-4A7C-4AAA-97C6-A0DAA259C8E3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6580826

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DB6B87B0-FFFB-FFE5-E1FD-0649FDF8F81E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Melitaea phoebe var. uralensis
status

 

M. phoebe var. uralensis Krulikovsky, 1897 View in CoL

[TL: District of Ufa, Russian Federation] a name subsequently replaced by M. phoebe ufensis Krulikovsky, 1902 (uralensis preoccupied by M. arduinna uralensis Eversmann, 1844 ). Higgins (1941: 343) equated this name to ornata Staudinger (an error of authority). This synonymy with M. ornata was accepted by Russell & Tennent (2016: 56, note 98); however, van Oorschot & Coutsis (2014: 60) placed it as a synonym of M. phoebe , possibly because they incorrectly synonymised M. ornata with M. phoebe ; Hesselbarth et al. (1995) overlooked this name. It is known that both M. phoebe and M. ornata fly in the southern Urals ( Russell & Tennent (2022), see Figs 1 & 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Anikin et al. (2017: 522) and Kostjuk & Zolotuhin (2017: 446 & plate 24, fig 4) figured the ‘Typus’, a specimen taken at Ufa on 10 June 1894 (= 24 June in today’s Gregorian calendar, not adopted in Russia until February 1918), which they designated as the lectotype. The specimen is figured here with the labels ( Figures 10A & B View FIGURES 7–11 ). From the underside of the specimen it can be seen that the submarginal black arches are slim and touch the intervening veins and the antenna are club-shaped rather than spatulate; thus the present authors consider that this specimen is M. phoebe rather than M. ornata . Krulikovsky probably considered this to be a variety due to its heavily marked and dark appearance.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Nymphalidae

Genus

Melitaea

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF