Tomopaguropsis rahayuae, Jung & Lemaitre & Kim, 2017

Jung, Jibom, Lemaitre, Rafael & Kim, Won, 2017, A new hermit crab species of the genus Tomopaguropsis Alcock, 1905 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Paguridae) from the Bohol Sea, Philippines, Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 65, pp. 168-174 : 169-173

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4504438

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CB50CF1-70C1-47E2-B4AE-3CF6548CB636

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D86387B5-F82E-E15F-FF20-DFA9FD584DEF

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Tomopaguropsis rahayuae
status

sp. nov.

Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species

( Figs. 1–4 View Fig View Fig View Fig )

Type examined. Holotype: female (sl 4.3 mm) ( NMCR 40005 ), Philippines, Bohol Sea , station DW2367, 08°55.3′N, 123°17.6′E, 269–280 m, sandy substrate, 27 May 2005 GoogleMaps . Paratype: ovigerous female (sl 4.8 mm) ( ZRC 2015.0505 View Materials ), Philippines, Bohol Sea , station CP2397, 09°34.9′N 123°41.7′E, 669–712 m, sandy substrate, 31 May 2005 GoogleMaps .

Description. Thirteen pairs of quadriserial gills.

Shield ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A View Fig ) well calcified, as long as broad; anterior margin between rostrum and lateral projection concave; anterolateral margin sloping; dorsal surface almost naked, slightly lustrous; dorsolateral and lateral margins with few tufts of setae. Rostrum shorter than lateral projections, broadly triangular, terminating subacutely. Lateral projection welldeveloped, triangular, ending in small spine. Carapace lateral lobe fused to shield. Posterior carapace with well calcified posteromedian and posterolateral plates. Branchiostegite membranous except for single, narrow calcified anterodorsal plate.

Ocular peduncle ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A View Fig ) short, about 0.4–0.5 times as long as shield, slightly narrowing distally; dorsomesial surface with longitudinal row of moderately long setae; cornea non-dilated. Ocular acicle well developed, subtriangular, terminating in strong acute spine reaching nearly to midlength of ocular peduncle; separated basally by about 0.2–0.3 basal width of 1 acicle.

Antennular peduncle ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A View Fig ) overreaching distal corneal margin by distal 0.5–0.6 of ultimate segment. Ultimate segment 3 times as long as penultimate segment. Basal segment with strong laterodistal spine. Ventral flagellum with 5–7 articles.

Antennal peduncle ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A View Fig ) overreaching distal corneal margin by 0.5 length of fifth segment. Third to fifth segments with scattered setae. Third segment with strong ventromesial spine distally. Second segment with dorsolateral distal angle prominently produced, terminating in strong spine and long setae dorsomesially; mesial margin with spine on dorsodistal angle. First segment with small spine and setae on lateral face distally. Acicle overreaching distal corneal margin by approximately 0.4–0.5 length, terminating in strong spine, with long setae distally. Flagellum distinctly exceeding chelipeds when fully extended, scattered with 3–4 flagellum articles-long setae.

Mandible with incisor process sinuous. Maxillule with external lobe of endopod slender, straight; internal lobe bearing long bristle distally. Maxilla with scaphognathite overreaching distal end of endopodite. Maxilliped 1 with exopod overreaching distal margin of endopodite. Maxilliped 2 without distinguishing characters. Maxilliped 3 with merus and carpus each armed with small, sharp dorsodistal spine; ischium ( Fig. 2D View Fig ) with crista dentata consisting of 12–15 small subequal corneous teeth, and 1 accessory tooth on right side only in holotype, or both sides in paratype. Basis with mesial spine.

Chelipeds ( Figs. 1 View Fig , 2B, 2C View Fig ) subequal in shape, right cheliped slightly longer and stouter in holotype, left cheliped distinctly longer and slightly stouter in paratype (see Remarks). Right cheliped with dactyl and fixed finger each terminating in sharp, curved corneous claw; dorsal surfaces with numerous moderately long tufts of setae; cutting edges of dactyl and fixed finger each with row of fused corneous teeth on distal third and 1 or 2 large calcareous teeth. Palm slightly longer than fingers; dorsal surface weakly convex, unarmed except for 2 tubercles of proximolateral surface; dorsolateral and dorsomesial margins scattered with setae and irregular rows of small tubercles. Carpus 1.4–1.5 times as long as palm; dorsodistal margin armed with 2 or 3 tubercles; dorsal surface with shallow longitudinal groove and few small tubercles on lateral half; dorsomesial margin with row of strong tubercles; lateral and mesial surfaces with moderately long tufts of setae; ventral surface smooth. Merus with dorsodistal margin with moderately long setae and 1 or 2 small spines; dorsal, lateral and ventral surfaces with tufts of setae, scattered small tubercles; mesial surface unarmed; ventrolateral margin with moderately long setae and row of small spinules or tubercles; ventromesial margin with moderately long setae and small spinules. Ischium unarmed except for row of small spines on ventromesial margin.

Left cheliped ( Figs. 1 View Fig , 2C View Fig ) similar in shape and armature to right, except for: cutting edge of dactyl and fixed finger each with longer row of fused corneous teeth on distal 0.5–0.6, presence of more minute spines on dorsal surfaces of merus, carpus and palm, and stronger spines on dorsomesial margin of carpus.

Right pereopod 2 and left pereopod 3 of holotype missing. Pereopod 2 and 3 ( Figs. 1 View Fig , 3A, 3B View Fig ) with numerous long setae, setae missing in pereopod 2 of holotype. Dactyl gently curved, 1.6–1.9 times as long as propodus, terminating in sharp corneous claw; lateral and mesial surfaces with a shallow longitudinal groove; ventromesial margin unarmed. Propodus with or without small spine on ventromesial distal angles, but otherwise lacking conspicuous armature. Carpus 0.6–0.8 times as long as propodus; dorsodistal margin with small blunt spine, otherwise lacking conspicuous armature. Merus as long as propodus; dorsal margin with row of low protuberances; ventral margin unarmed. Ischium unarmed, but with few setae on dorsal and ventral margins.

Pereopod 4 ( Fig. 3C View Fig ) semichelate; carpus, merus and ischium with moderately long setae on dorsal margins; lateral and mesial faces glabrous. Dactyl elongate subtriangular, gently curved, terminating in sharp, corneous claw, lacking preungual process, bearing ventrolateral row of minute, fused corneous teeth. Propodal rasp consisting of 3 rows of ovate corneous scales proximally, becoming 2 rows distally. Carpus, merus and ischium without distinctive features.

Pereopod 5 chelate. Dactyl with dense setae. Propodus with dense setae and well developed rasp covering nearly half of lateral face of propodus. Carpus, merus and ischium without distinctive features.

Sternite IX (of maxillipeds 3) with strong spine on each side of midline (in holotype with additional shorter spine on left side). Sternite XII (of pereopods 3; Fig. 1B View Fig ) divided into anterior and posterior portions by membranous hinge; anterior lobe semicircular, with setae distally; posterior portion divided into plates by deep median groove. Sternite XIV (of pereopods 5) weakly divided anteriorly into pair of setose lobes, and with low posteromedian rounded ridge. Pleon ( Fig. 1 View Fig ) straight, slightly flexed. First somite ( Figs. 1 View Fig , 4A) fused to last thoracic somite, tergite weakly calcified, with pair of small calcareous plates.

Uropods ( Figs. 1 View Fig , 4B) symmetrical, endopod about 0.5 times as long as exopod. Telson ( Figs. 1B View Fig , 4B) symmetrical or nearly so (each side differing slightly in spine number on terminal margins of posterior lobes), as long as broad, with distinct lateral indentations separating anterior and posterior lobes; posterior lobes separated by shallow median cleft, terminal margins armed with 5–8 strong, subequal spines interspersed with weak spines.

Female lacking pleopod 1, with left unpaired pleopod 2–5 biramous. Male unknown.

Colour. Living colour unknown. In ethanol preservative, straw with light or dark brown corneas.

Habitat. Both holotype and paratype were found using a scaphopod tusk shell as housing.

Distribution. Known so far only from the Bohol Sea, Philippines; depth: 269– 712 m.

Etymology. The specific name is to honor Dr. Dwi Listyo Rahayu, Marine Bio-Industry Implementation Unit, Research Centre for Oceanography, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Indonesia, and acknowledge her important taxonomic contributions to the Paguroidea fauna, and who first discovered the specimen in the collections of LKCNHM.

Remarks. Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, might seem distinguishable from other congenerics by the straight pleon (vs. coiled in all other congenerics) ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). A straight pleon, however, is the result of housing in a scaphopod tusk shell. A number of paguroid species are known to use both straight and coiled shells, and thus the same species can have a straight or a coiled pleon ( Komai et al., 2010) (R. Lemaitre, pers. observation). Whether the use of scaphopod shells is a strict preference by T. rahayuae , new species, cannot be ascertained at this time given that only two specimens are known and no field studies are feasible. Other Paguridae , known to live exclusively at least in adults, in straight types of housing (e.g., scaphopod or pteropod shells, and sabellarian or serpulid worm tubes) include species of Pylopagurus A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1891 (see McLaughlin & Lemaitre, 2001), Discorsopagurus McLaughlin, 1974 (see Gherardi & Cassidy 1994; Gherardi & McLaughlin 1995; Komai, 1995, 2003a; Komai & Takeda, 1996), Pteropagurus McLaughlin & Rahayu, 2006 (see McLaughlin & Rahayu, 2006; McLaughlin, 2007), Dentalopagurus McLaughlin, 2007 (see McLaughlin, 2007), and Paguritta Melin, 1939 (see McLaughlin & Leimatire, 1993; Komai & Nishi, 1996; Komai & Okuno, 2001).

The symmetry of the uropods in Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, ( Fig. 4B) is unique among species of Tomopaguropsis , and is the most conspicuous diagnostic morphological character for this new species as this structure is asymmetrical in all other congenerics. Symmetry of uropods has been studied for Discorsopagurus schmitti ( Stevens, 1925) (see Gherardi & Cassidy, 1994; Gherardi & McLaughlin, 1995), and for Lophopagurus (Australeremus) triserratus ( Ortmann, 1892) (see McLaughlin & Gunn, 1992). In these two species, the symmetry of the uropod is quite constant, and not influenced by type of housing, so it is reasonable to infer that the same symmetrical constancy occurs in this new species.

Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, is most similar to T. crinita . Aside from the difference in uropod shape, the two differ in only relatively minor details. The rostrum is shorter than the lateral projections in T. rahayuae , new species ( Figs. 1A View Fig , 2A View Fig ), whereas the rostrum and lateral projections are similar in the length in T. crinita . The dorsolateral margins of carpi and ventral surfaces of meri of the chelipeds have small tubercles in T. rahayuae , new species ( Fig. 2B, C View Fig ), whereas those surfaces lack tubercles in T. crinita . The ventral margins of the dactyls of the pereopods 2 and 3 (ambulatory legs) are unarmed in T. rahayuae , new species ( Fig. 3A, B View Fig ), whereas there are 9 to 25 small corneous spines in T. crinita . The carpi of the ambulatory legs have a dorsodistal spine in T. rahayuae , new species ( Fig. 3A, B View Fig ), whereas the carpi are unarmed dorsodistally in T. crinita . The median region of the sternite of the first pleonal somite is concave in T. rahayuae , new species ( Fig. 4A), whereas in T. crinita there is a median lobe.

Two asymmetrical morphological conditions were observed in the holotype of Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, on the third maxillipeds and associated sternite IX ( Fig. 2D View Fig ): an accessory tooth is present only on the right ischium; and the sternite has a simple spine on the right side and a bifid spine on the left side of the midline. These conditions are not rare among the Paguroidea , although they have been rarely reported in the literature (R. Lemaitre, pers. observation). Komai (2003b), for example, has documented different number of accessory teeth on each side of the ischium of the third maxillipeds in Pagurus japonicus ( Stimpson, 1858) , P. similis ( Ortmann, 1892) , and P. rubrior Komai, 2003 . We have found a similar asymmetrical condition in specimens deposited in the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History of P. prideaux Leach, 1815 (USNM 121814), and Lophopagurus (Lophopagurus) lacertosus ( Henderson, 1888) (USNM 244454).

In the paratype of Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, the left cheliped is stouter and distinctly longer than the right cheliped. This condition may be due to regeneration as the holotype of Tomopaguropsis rahayuae , new species, and other species of the genus Tomopaguropsis , have subequal chelipeds (see A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier, 1893; Alcock, 1905; McLaughlin, 1997; Lemaitre et al., 2014). We have found a similar condition in specimen deposited in the Marine Arthropod Depository Bank of Korea (MADBK) of Pagurus constans ( Stimpson, 1858) (MADBK 160705_008). For example, a specimen of P. constans has a left cheliped longer and stouter than the right cheliped even though the normal condition in this species is for the right to be larger than the left (see Stimpson, 1858).

This is the first record of a species of Tomopaguropsis from the Philippines region, although T. crinita and T. miyakei are known from the not so distant Indonesian waters.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF