Pselnophorus Wallengren, 1881
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181794 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6231152 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D5443619-4004-DA7D-CED0-494AD9C8FBBC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pselnophorus Wallengren, 1881 |
status |
|
Pselnophorus Wallengren, 1881 View in CoL
Pselnophorus Wallengren, 1881: 96 View in CoL .
Crasimetis Meyrick, 1890: 484 View in CoL , 489.
Type species: Alucita brachydactyla Kollar, 1832 .
Diagnosis. Gielis (1993, 1996) indicated that Pselnophorus resembles Pterophorus Schäffer and Oidaematophorus Wallengren , and that their differences lie in venation only. During our study, we found more differences among these three genera. First, the cleft in the forewing of Pselnophorus is from one-third, while it is from the middle or near the base in Pterophorus and Oidaematophorus . Secondly, the marking on forewing in Pselnophorus is white mixed with grey to greyish brown, while in Pterophorus it is white, scattered with some black to blackish brown spots, and in Oidaematophorus it is darker, mixed with blackish brown to black spots. Moreover, in Pterophorus all lobes of the forewing and hindwing are very slender, needle-like.
In his revision of the Pselnophorus complex, Arenberger (1990) presented that Pselnophorus is similar to Gypsochares Meyrick except that R5 is from the base of R 4 in Pselnophorus , but from 1/3 to 1/2 of R 4 in Gypsochares . In this study, we found that the members of Pselnophorus are usually larger, and that their forewing markings are brighter than those of Gypsochares .
Description. Head ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ) scales appressed, without obvious frontal tuft. Labial palpus upcurved, slen- der. Antenna with dense ciliae. Spurs of hindleg with basal scale-brush, lateral spur shorter than medial spur. All lobes of forewing without anal angle. Forewing ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 5 ): R1 absent, R2 free, R4 stalked with R5; CuA1 from basal 1/3 of M3 on second lobe, CuA2 from beyond cell. Hindwing without “scale tooth”; third lobe with two veins; all lobes very narrow and pointed.
Male genitalia: Uncus tapered, about as long as tegumen. Tegumen arched. Valvae asymmetrical. Sacculus with prominent thorns or spines. Saccus narrow. Phallus somewhat curved, with or without lateral spine; cornutus absent.
Female genitalia: Ostium bursae and antrum symmetrical, centrally or laterally located. Ductus bursae simple, without sclerotized segments or ridges. Corpus bursae spherical to elongately spherical, without signum.
Host plants. Asteraceae : Mycelis muralis L., Prenanthes purpurea L. and Lapsana communis L. ( Gielis, 1993, 1996).
Distribution. Palaearctic, Oriental, Afrotropical and Nearctic regions.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pselnophorus Wallengren, 1881
Hao, Shulian & Li, Houhun 2008 |
Crasimetis
Meyrick 1890: 484 |
Pselnophorus
Wallengren 1881: 96 |