Salsola L., Sp. Pl.: 222 (1753)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.116.27301 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D1B8D43B-D09C-CFF6-C7B4-D243AFDFBC0B |
treatment provided by |
PhytoKeys by Pensoft (2019-04-15 12:16:11, last updated 2024-11-26 11:09:04) |
scientific name |
Salsola L., Sp. Pl.: 222 (1753) |
status |
|
17. Salsola L., Sp. Pl.: 222 (1753)
S. kali L. (Type).
=Kali Miller, Gard. Dict. Abr., ed. 4: [715] (1754). Type: K. turgidum (Dumort.) Gutermann, Phyton (Horn) 51(1): 98 (2011).
Taxonomic notes.
The taxa related to Salsola kali were considered within the reinstated genus Kali ( Akhani et al. 2007), which was accepted in subsequent taxonomic treatments ( Gutermann 2011, Sukhorukov et al. 2011, Sukhorukov 2014, Brullo et al. 2015, Sukhorukov et al. 2016b). However, Mosyakin et al. (2014, 2017) presented some arguments in favour of a recent nomenclatural proposal to conserve the generic name Salsola with S. kali (= Kali turgidum ) as a conserved type. The Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants did not reach a consensus regarding the recommenda tion or rejection of this proposal ( Applequist 2016), but the accepted type of the genus Salsola is S. kali under the new Art. 10.5-10.7 of the ICN ( Turland et al. 2018).
Description.
Annuals or subshrubs, glabrous or papillate, with tufts of simple curved hairs in the leaf axils. Leaves mostly alternate or lower leaves opposite, semi-terete or terete, sometimes flattened, usually less than 5 mm in width, stiff or fleshy, with a persistent yellowish mucro up to 3.5-4.0 mm long. Bracts longer than bracteoles or equal in size. Flowers of two types: some located below the main inflorescence and arranged in clusters mostly consisting of two female flowers supported by concrescent and basally hardened bracts and bracteoles, rarely clusters one-flowered (these fall off with bracts and bracteoles), perianth r-shaped, usually with small wings, tubercles or without any projections in the flexure; flowers of the second type grouped in the main inflorescence, hermaphrodite, each flower supported by a free bract and two bracteoles (rarely concrescent), r-shaped or tubuliform at fruiting (in the latter case, the segments in their upper part are convergent, forming a stout or hyaline conus that covers the fruit from above). Perianth of (4)5 segments, with well-developed, equal or unequal wings or tubercles at the fruiting stage. Stamens (in the hermaphrodite flowers) 5, divided in the lower half, without prominent appendages at the tip of the anthers. Stigmas 2, usually equal to style (or a style is very short). Fruits dry or somewhat fleshy in the upper part. Seeds with horizontal or obliquely orientated embryo (sometimes seems to be vertical due to anacrostyly). Perisperm absent.
Approximately 22 species in the steppes, seashores and deserts of Eurasia, North America, Africa and Australia.
Akhani, H, Edwards, G, Roalson, EH, 2007. Diversification of the Old World Salsoleae s.l. (Chenopodiaceae): Molecular phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and chloroplast data sets and a revised classification. International Journal of Plant Sciences 168 (6): 931 - 956, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/518263
Applequist, WL, 2016. Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Vascular Plants: 68. Taxon 65 (6): 1153 - 1165, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12705/655.16
Brullo, C, Brullo, S, Gaskin, JF, Giusso del Galdo, G, Hrusa, GF, Salmeri, C, 2015. A new species of Kali (Salsoloideae, Chenopodiaceae) from Sicily, supported by molecular analysis. Phytotaxa 201 (4): 256 - 277, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.201.4.2
Gutermann, W, 2011. Notulae nomenclaturales 41-45 (Neue Namen bei Cruciata und Kali sowie einige kleinere Korrekturen). Phyton 51: 95 - 102
Mosyakin, SL, Rilke, S, Freitag, H, 2014. Proposal to conserve the name Salsola (Chenopodiaceae s. str.; Amaranthaceae sensu APG) with a conserved type. Taxon 63 (5): 1134 - 1135, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12705/635.15
Mosyakin, SL, Freitag, H, Rilke, S, 2017. Kali versus Salsola: The instructive story of a questionable nomenclatural resurrection. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences 64 (1-2): 18 - 30, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07929978.2016.1256135
Sukhorukov, AP, Akopyan, JA, Zernov, AS, 2011. About some new and critical Chenopodiaceae representatives in the Caucasus. Novosti Sistematiki Vysshykh Rasteniy 42: 106 - 110
Sukhorukov, AP, 2014. The carpology of the Chenopodiaceae with reference to the phylogeny, systematics and diagnostics of its representatives. Grif & Co., Tula. [in Russian with English summary]
Sukhorukov, AP, Aellen, P, Edmondson, JR, Townsend, CC, 2016b. Chenopodiaceae. In: Ghazanfar, SA, Edmondson, JR, Eds., Flora of Iraq, Vol. 5(1). Bell and Bain Ltd, Glasgow: 164 - 256
Turland, NJ, Wiersema, JH, Barrie, FR, Greuter, W, Hawksworth, DL, Herendeen, PS, Knapp, S, Kusber, W-H, Li, D-Z, Marhold, K, May, TW, McNeill, J, Monro, AM, Prado, J, Price, MJ, Smith, GF, 2018. (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Glashuetten, Koeltz Botanical Books (Regnum Vegetabile 159).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Chenopodioideae |