Deutonura breviseta, Smolis & Skarżyński, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.992.56921 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F143D360-4A50-4567-AEBC-4F7425D6FEC0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/98297969-EFC7-42C8-9597-14ED4612CD03 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:98297969-EFC7-42C8-9597-14ED4612CD03 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Deutonura breviseta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Deutonura breviseta sp. nov. Figs 42-52 View Figures 42–52 , Tables 10, 11, 12
Type material.
Holotype: male on slide, Iran, Gilan Province, near Asalem, 300-600 m a.s.l., large beeches, sifting, 30.VI.1973, leg. A. Senglet, sample 7308. Paratypes: 3 females and 2 males on slide, same data as holotype.
Other material.
Iran, female on slide, Gilan Province, Asalem (37°45'N, 48°57'E), leaves and tree holes, sifting, 11.VI.1975, leg. A. Senglet, 7519; female, male and 2 juveniles on slide, Gilan Province, Paresar, tree holes, leaves, sifting, 2.VII.1973, leg. A. Senglet, 7310; male on slide, Mazandaran Province, Nashtarud, forest, reserve, sifting, 10.VII.1973, leg. A. Senglet, 7318; female and 3 males on slide, Mazandaran Province, near Amol, forest, sifting, 18.VII.1973, leg. A. Senglet, 7329b; 4 females, 3 males and juvenile on slide, Mazandaran Province, Aliabad, 30.VII.1974, leg. A. Senglet, 7475; female on slide, Gilan Province, road to Dyavaherdeh, 1100-1300 m a.s.l., 7.VIII. 1974, leg. A. Senglet, 7484.
Etymology.
The name of the new species is referring to its exceptionally short macrochaetae Ml.
Diagnosis.
Habitus typical of the genus Deutonura . Dorsal tubercles present and well developed. 2+2 large pigmented eyes. Buccal cone relatively long and wide, labrum without ogival sclerifications. Head without chaetae E, O and L3. Tubercles Cl and Af separate. No granular area between chaetae A and B on head. Tubercles De on Th. II and III with 3 and 4 chaetae, respectively. Tubercles Di on Abd. V not bilobed. Cryptopygy not developed. Male ventral organ present.
Description.
General. Body length (without antennae): 0.7 (juvenile) to 1.7 mm (holotype: 0.85 mm). Colour of the body white. 2+2 large black eyes, in a typical arrangement for the genus (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 43 View Figures 42–52 ).
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of five types: long macrochaetae (Ml), short macrochaetae (Mc), very short macrochaetae (Mcc), mesochaetae and microchaetae. Long macrochaetae thickened, slightly arc-like or straight, narrowly sheathed, serrated, apically rounded and extended at apex (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 43 View Figures 42–52 , 50 View Figures 42–52 , 52 View Figures 42–52 ). Macrochaetae Mc and Mcc morphologically similar to long macrochaetae, but much shorter (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 43 View Figures 42–52 , 50 View Figures 42–52 ). Mesochaetae similar to ventral chaetae, thin, smooth and pointed. Microchaetae similar to mesochaetae, but clearly shorter (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 43 View Figures 42–52 ). S-chaetae of terga thin, smooth and short, notably shorter than nearby macrochaetae (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 50 View Figures 42–52 , 51 View Figures 42–52 ).
Antennae. Typical of the genus. Dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III-IV as in Fig. 46 View Figures 42–52 and Table 11 View Table 11 . S-chaetae of Ant. IV of medium length and relatively thin, sensillum sgd short and straight (Fig. 46 View Figures 42–52 ). Apical vesicle distinct, trilobate (Figs 44 View Figures 42–52 , 45 View Figures 42–52 ). Ventral chaetotaxy of Ant. III as in Fig. 47 View Figures 42–52 and Table 11 View Table 11 , ventral chaetotaxy of Ant. IV as Table 11 View Table 11 .
Mouthparts. Buccal cone relatively short and wide, labral sclerifications nonogival (Fig. 42 View Figures 42–52 ). Labrum chaetotaxy: 2/2, 4. Labium with four basal, three distal and four lateral chaetae, papillae x absent. Maxilla styliform mandible thin and tridentate.
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Head without granular area between chaetae A and B. Elementary tubercles DE and EE on head absent (Fig. 42 View Figures 42–52 ). Head without chaetae E, O and L3, chaeta D free (Figs 42 View Figures 42–52 , 43 View Figures 42–52 ). Chaetae Ocm and Ocp of nearly equal length. Chaetae De2 on head usually as Mcc, rarely as mi (Fig. 42 View Figures 42–52 ). Chaeta Dl6 on head as Mccormi. Th. I with tubercles Di and De not fused. Chaetae Di3 on Th. II-III free. On Th. III, chaetae De2 slightly shorter than De3 (Fig. 42 View Figures 42–52 ). On Abd. I-III, chaetae De2 distinctly shorter than De3 (Fig. 50 View Figures 42–52 ). Cryptopygy absent, Abd. VI well visible from above.
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 3, 4 and 4 chaetae, respectively. Group Vi on head with 6 chaetae. On Abd. IV, furca rudimentary without microchaetae. Male with thick and forked chaetae (male ventral organ) around genital aperture (Abd. V). On Abd. V, chaetae Vl and L’ present (Fig. 48 View Figures 42–52 ).
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Table 12 View Table 12 . Claw without internal tooth (Fig. 49 View Figures 42–52 ). On tibiotarsi, chaeta M present and chaetae B4 and B5 relatively long and pointed.
Remarks.
Deutonura breviseta sp. nov. seems to be closest to D. persica Smolis, Shayanmehr & Yoosefi-Lafooraki, 2018 recently described from the northern part of Iran (Mazandaran Province, Smolis et al. 2018). However, these species differ in numerous characters, including the number of lateral labial chaetae (in breviseta , four, in persica , three), the presence of chaetae C on the head (in breviseta , present, in persica , absent), the number of chaetae (L+So) on the head (in breviseta , 9, in persica 8), the presence of chaetae Dl3 on the head (in breviseta , present, in persica , absent), the presence of microchaetae on furca rudimentary (in breviseta , absent, in persica , present) and the presence of cryptopygy (in breviseta , present, in persica , absent). Additionally, male ventral organ in D. breviseta sp. nov. is built of thickened and forked chaetae on Abd. V only (in persica , also on Abd. III, IV and VI).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |