Psechrus torvus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869 )

Bayer, Steffen, 2012, The lace-sheet-weavers — a long story (Araneae: Psechridae: Psechrus), Zootaxa 3379 (1), pp. 1-170 : 127-129

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3379.1.1

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0272654-FFFE-58C3-FF20-28FAFD57466D

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Psechrus torvus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869 )
status

 

Psechrus torvus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869) View in CoL

Figs 69a–g View FIGURES 69 , 70a–d View FIGURES 70 , 86g View FIGURES 86 , 89m View FIGURES 89 , 92m View FIGURES 92

Tegenaria torva O. Pickard-Cambridge 1869: 376 , pl. 11, figs 10–20 ( Description   GoogleMaps of ♂ and ♀, illustration of ♂). [Lectotype: 1 ♀ ( SB 93 ), here designated, from SRI LANKA (‘Ceylon’): Central Province: Ramboda (‘Rambodde’), ca. N 07°02', E 80°42', 1000–1700 m; J. Nietner leg. ca. 1855; OUMNH; Paralectotypes: 3 ♂ ( SB 264 , 268–269 ), 7 ♀♀ ( SB 263 , 265–267 , 270–271 , 275 ), 1 s.a. ♂ ( SB 274 ), 2 s.a. ♀♀ ( SB 272–273 ), with same data as for lectotype; OUMNH, all type material examined].

Notes on type material: During his stay in Ceylon ( Sri Lanka) between 1852 and 1874, John Nietner spent most of his time in the area of ‘Rambodde’ (presently Ramboda) as plantation owner ( Kraatz 1857), where he collected plenty of insect material ( Nietner 1855). It is likely that he collected the type specimens of Tegenaria torva at the same locality.

The type series contains one specimen (♀ SB 275) belonging to another species (see material list in the species description of P.hartmanni sp. nov.).

Lancaria torva — Karsch 1879: 557 (Transfer from Tegenaria View in CoL ).

Psechrus torvus View in CoL — Simon 1887: 194 (Syn. of Lancaria with Psechrus View in CoL ; Formal transfer from Lancaria ). Karsch 1891: 275 (Syn. with P. argentatus View in CoL ). Simon 1892: 225 (Removed from Syn. with P. argentatus View in CoL ), 224, figs 173, 175 (Non description & illustration of ♂, misidentified, see P. hartmanni View in CoL sp. nov.). Pocock 1900: 211. Simon 1906: 287 (Non record of ♀ from Singapore, misidentified, see P. singaporensis View in CoL ). Kulczyṅski 1908: 567. Berland and Berland 1914: 133. Sherriffs 1919: 222. Fage 1929: 359. Reimoser 1934: 467 (Non record of ♀ from Pumbarai, India, misidentified, see P. crepido View in CoL sp. nov.). Kayashima 1962: 9, figs 1–4 (Non illustration of ♀, misidentified, see P. clavis View in CoL sp. nov.). Lee 1966: 18, figs 3e–g (Non illustration of ♂ and ♀, misidentified, see P. taiwanensis View in CoL ). Lehtinen 1967: 260, fig. 476 (Non illustration of ♀, misidentified, see P. decollatus View in CoL sp. nov.). Tikader 1977: 209. Levi 1982: 120, figs 16–28, ad part, figs 23–28 misidentified (Description of ♂ and ♀, figs 16–22: illustration of ♂, s.a. ♀ and ♀). Hu 1984: 57, figs 51.1–3 (Non illustration of ♂ and ♀, misidentified, see P. taiwanensis View in CoL ). Yin et al. 1985: 19. Song et al. 1999: 398. Song et al. 2002: 373 (Erroneously listed as fauna element of Singapore [according to Simon 1906]. However, to date this species has been recorded only from Sri Lanka and India). Sebastian and Peter 2009: 279, 528.

Psechrus alticeps Pocock 1899: 751 View in CoL (Description of s.a. ♀). [Syntypes: 1 s.a. ♀ (SB 234), 1 ♂ (SB 235), 1 juv. (SB 1047), all from INDIA: Kerala Province (‘Travancore’): Ponmudi, ca. N 08°45', E 77°07', 700–800 m; H. Ferguson leg. III.1896; NHM 1899˙1˙17˙54–55, all type material examined]. Pocock 1900: 211. Simon 1906: 286. Kulczyṅski 1908: 567. Berland and Berland 1914: 132. Sherriffs 1919: 223. Chamberlin 1924: 2. Fage 1929: 360. Lehtinen 1967: 261 (Syn.).

Note on type material: Pocock (1899) did not mention how many type specimens he had designated and of which sex they were. He only described the (subadult) female, so one would guess that there are no males among type material, but there is one male that is missing both pedipalps. The femur, patella and tibia from the right pedipalp are still present. Maybe the two palpal organs were already lost, when Pocock examined this male, otherwise he should have recognised it as such.

Additional material examined (2 ♀♀, 3 s.a. ♀♀, 1 s.a. ♂). INDIA: Tamil Nadu Province: Anaimalai Sanctuary (20 km SW of Pollachi), Top Slip , ca. N 10°27'30'', E 76°53', 1300–1400 m; W. Eberhard leg. XII.1983; 1 s.a. ♀ ( SB 622 ) GoogleMaps , 1 s.a. ♂ ( SB 623 ), MCZ 82514; 1 s.a. ♀ ( SB 168 ), MCZ 82519 . SRI LANKA: Central Province: Pundaluoya , ca. N 07°00'30'', E 80°40', ca. 1100 m; E. E. Green leg. before 1898; 1 ♀ ( SB 260 ) GoogleMaps , NHM 1899˙12˙13˙19. Labugolla, Mackwoods Tea Centre , N 07°01'24.5'', E 80°43'07.4'', ca. 1500 m, tea plantation, under large rock; V. Hartmann leg. 10.I.2011; 1 ♀ ( SB 941 , raised from juvenile, pre-epigyne of cuticle of subadult instar was kept), SMF GoogleMaps .

Revised diagnosis (see also diagnosis for torvus -group above). Males with long conductor (C) (longer than width of tegulum [T], Figs 70a–c View FIGURES 70 ). Embolus (E) with two helical windings ( Fig. 70c View FIGURES 70 ), tip of harpago (H) pointing proximally ( Figs 70a,c View FIGURES 70 ). Females with distally rounded branches of tegimentum (TM) pointing anterio-medially ( Figs 69a,d View FIGURES 69 , 89m View FIGURES 89 ). First loop of copulatory duct (CD) directed anteriorly, larger than second loop ( Fig. 69b View FIGURES 69 ).

Description. Male:

Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 5.3–7.2, carapace width 3.8–4.8, anterior width of carapace 2.3–2.8, opisthosoma length 5.5–8.2, opisthosoma width 2.3–5.0. Eyes: AME 0.26–0.34, ALE 0.36–0.39, PME 0.33–0.36, PLE 0.36–0.42, AME–AME 0.14–0.24, AME–ALE 0.03–0.04, PME–PME 0.18–0.22, PME–PLE 0.26–0.31, AME–PME 0.44–0.54, ALE–PLE 0.34–0.43, clypeus height at AME 0.51–1.11, clypeus height at ALE 0.43–0.93.

Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.

Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1423. Palp: 7.7–9.5 [2.8–3.4, 1.2–1.6, 1.5–1.7, 2.2–2.8]; Legs: I 45.0–53.3 [10.9–13.8, 2.5–3.4, 12.3–14.4, 12.6–14.3, 6.7–7.4], II 33.6–41.0 [8.8–11.3, 2.3–3.0, 8.6–10.9, 8.9–10.4, 5.0–5.4], III 22.2–26.3 [6.5–7.7, 1.8–2.2, 5.3–6.2, 5.4–6.4, 3.2–3.8], IV 35.4–41.7 [9.0–11.3, 2.0–2.7, 8.5–10.0, 10.0–11.1, 5.9–6.6].

Spination. Palp: 132, 000, 0000; legs: femur I 546, II 546 (556) , III 545 , IV 544 (545) ; patella I–IV 000; tibia I– II 3038 , III 2134 (2124) , IV 3136 (3126) ; metatarsus I 3037, II 3037 (3035) , III 3035 , IV 3036 (3046).

Palpal femur without modification ( Fig. 70d View FIGURES 70 ). MC-I–II and MT-I: absent.

Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description for torvus -group). Harpago arising at 12:30 o’ clock position on tegulum. Conductor with almost pointed tip, embolus base protruding retrolaterally ( Fig. 70b View FIGURES 70 ). Sperm duct with flat curve anterio-prolaterally ( Fig. 70b View FIGURES 70 ). Cymbium dorsally with very dense scopula, covering 2/3 of cymbium. Palpal tibia relatively long ( Figs 70a–c View FIGURES 70 ), its distal retrolateral bulge not very distinct ( Fig. 70b View FIGURES 70 ).

Female (Measurements of lectotype first, those of other females as range in parentheses):

Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 8.0 (7.9–9.0), carapace width 5.5 (5.2–6.2), anterior width of carapace 3.7 (3.6–4.0), opisthosoma length 10.8 (10.1–12.6), opisthosoma width 6.0 (5.5–9.2). Eyes: AME 0.38 (0.36–0.38), ALE 0.47 (0.41–0.47), PME 0.45 (0.41–0.48), PLE 0.48 (0.47–0.48), AME–AME 0.24 (0.23–0.27), AME–ALE 0.06 (0.06–0.08), PME–PME 0.34 (0.26–0.34), PME–PLE 0.42 (0.36–0.42), AME–PME 0.63 (0.61–0.65), ALE–PLE 0.53 (0.49–0.54), clypeus height at AME 1.44 (1.21–1.55), clypeus height at ALE 1.16 (1.09–1.38).

Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.

Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1423. Palp: 10.4 (9.9–11.4) [3.5 (3.4–4.2), 1.5 (1.4–1.6), 2.0 (1.9–2.1), 3.4 (3.2–3.5)]; Legs: I 48.7 (43.6–48.0) [12.4 (11.0–13.0), 3.6 (3.3–3.7), 13.2 (12.1–12.8), 12.8 (11.5–12.2), 6.7 (5.7–6.3)], II 37.6 (34.6–38.8) [10.3 (9.8–11.1), 3.0 (3.0–3.5), 9.9 (9.1–9.8), 9.6 (8.4–9.5), 4.8 (4.3–4.9)], III 25.6 (23.4–26.1) [7.6 (7.2–8.1), 2.4 (2.3–2.5), 6.0 (5.4–6.4), 6.3 (5.7–6.5), 3.3 (2.8–3.4)], IV 38.7 (35.1–39.0) [10.5 (9.7–11.2), 2.9 (2.6–3.0), 9.4 (8.4–9.6), 10.2 (9.3–10.0), 5.7 (5.1–5.5)].

Palpal claw with 15 (13–15) teeth.

Spination. Palp: 131{141} (131,141), 110{120} (110,110), 1101 (1101), 1014 (1014); legs (—except for patella— variable, only most common states noted): femur I 546 (546,556), II 546 (546,555) III 545 (545,555), IV 553 (554,454); patella I–IV 000; tibia I– II 3038 (3038), III 2124 (2124,3124), IV 3136 (3136); metatarsus I– II 3037 (3037), III 3035 (3035,3037), IV 3046 (3046,3036,3047).

Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description of torvus -group). Epigyne without (distinct) epigynal field (EF) ( Figs 69a,d View FIGURES 69 , 89m View FIGURES 89 ). Copulatory ducts distinctly larger than receptacula. Spermathecal heads arising anterio-medial on receptacula ( Fig. 69b View FIGURES 69 ).

Primordial copulatory organ. Pre-epigyne: Pre-MS just slightly broader than long, with parallel lateral margins, curves of anterior margins narrow ( Fig. 69g View FIGURES 69 ). Distance between the two endings of anterior margins longer than half the length of pre-MS.

Pre-vulva: Pre-CD long, narrow and anteriorly with narrow curve ( Fig. 69f View FIGURES 69 ).

Colouration of male and female (see also description for torvus -group and Psechrus ). Sternum unicoloured yellowish brown. Median bands on carapace serrated. Lateral bands broad (ca. 2x diameter of PME) and serrated. Light longitudinal line ventrally on opisthosoma mostly continuous, but sometimes broken subdistally and narrow to very narrow. If measured centrally on opisthosoma, its width is 0.1–0.3 times the width of one half of the cribellum.

Variation of copulatory organs. Males only with marginal intraspecific variation in the structures of bulb. Females: Lateral margins of tegimentum (TM) may be with slight curves ( Fig. 69a View FIGURES 69 ) or without ( Fig. 69d View FIGURES 69 ). Vulvae without significant variation ( Figs 69b,e View FIGURES 69 , 92m View FIGURES 92 ).

Remarks: Psechrus alticeps Pocock, 1899 was synonymised with P. torvus by Lehtinen (1967). Though Lehtinen gave no reason for this synonymy, he most likely was right. Firstly, the pre-epigynes of the subadult female syntype of P. alticeps matches the pre-epigyne of a P. torvus specimen from Labugolla, which is very close to type locality. The respective specimen (SB 941) had been raised from juvenile for the present study. After the final moult its exuviae was kept and the pre-epigyne was dissected and examined. Secondly, the pre-epigynes of the s.a. ♀ syntypes of P. torvus match those of P. alticeps , which Levi (1982) had already recognised. Thirdly and finally, the palpal femur of the male syntype of P. alticeps does not show the slightest modification and its palpal tibia is quite long and has a rather indistinct retrolateral bulge distally, like in the male paralectotypes of P. torvus and unlike in similar species related with P. torvus (see below).

Sherriffs (1919) stated that he has observed the webs of P. torvus in the field. Notice that at least a part of the material collected by Sherriffs in Sri Lanka (it is possible that additional material is deposited in other museums or were lost) had been checked in the present study and had proved to belong to other, closely related species.

Jose and Sebastian (2001) reported P. alticeps from Kerala Province, India, which is correct, as the type locality Ponmundi belongs to the present Kerala Province. However, they reproduced the illustrations of the copulatory organs of Fecenia protensa Thorell, 1891 after Tikader (1977, sub Psechrus nicobarensis ) (on this in detail see Bayer 2011, p. 31).

Distribution. Sri Lanka, India ( Fig. 94 View FIGURE 94 ).

SMF

Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Psechridae

Genus

Psechrus

Loc

Psechrus torvus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869 )

Bayer, Steffen 2012
2012
Loc

Psechrus alticeps

Lehtinen, P. T. 1967: 261
Fage, L. 1929: 360
Chamberlin, R. V. 1924: 2
Sherriffs, W. R. 1919: 223
Berland, J. & Berland, L. 1914: 132
Simon, E. 1906: 286
Pocock, R. I. 1900: 211
Pocock, R. I. 1899: 751
1899
Loc

Psechrus torvus

Sebastian, P. A. & Peter, K. V. 2009: 279
Song, D. X. & Zhang, J. X. & Li, D. 2002: 373
Song, D. X. & Zhu, M. S. & Chen, J. 1999: 398
Yin, C. M. & Wang, J. F. & Zhang, Y. J. 1985: 19
Hu, J. L. 1984: 57
Levi, H. W. 1982: 120
Tikader, B. K. 1977: 209
Lehtinen, P. T. 1967: 260
Lee, C. L. 1966: 18
Kayashima, I. 1962: 9
Reimoser, E. 1934: 467
Fage, L. 1929: 359
Sherriffs, W. R. 1919: 222
Berland, J. & Berland, L. 1914: 133
Simon, E. 1906: 287
Pocock, R. I. 1900: 211
Simon, E. 1892: 225
Karsch, F. 1891: 275
Simon, E. 1887: 194
1887
Loc

Lancaria torva

Karsch, F. 1879: 557
1879
Loc

Tegenaria torva O. Pickard-Cambridge 1869: 376

Pickard-Cambridge, O. 1869: 376
1869
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF