Ripersiella Tinsley, 1899

Schneider, Scott A. & LaPolla, John S., 2022, A Neotropical complex of Ripersiella species (Hemiptera, Coccomorpha, Rhizoecidae) collected from the nests of Acropyga ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae), ZooKeys 1123, pp. 1-30 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1123.90141

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B80C686A-001C-4A72-9E8A-7DED3FEE9515

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF9C2425-E6C0-5CFE-AD05-2D6A659D371F

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Ripersiella Tinsley, 1899
status

 

Genus Ripersiella Tinsley, 1899

Ripersiella Tinsley in Cockerell, 1899: 278. Type species: Ripersia rumicis Maskell, 1892.

Rhizoecus (Pararhizoecus) Goux, 1941: 197. Type species: Rhizoecus petiti Goux, 1941.

Pararhizoecus Goux, 1941; Goux 1943: 41.

Remark.

The new species described below are placed in Ripersiella based on the following diagnosis, which is a condensed version of the comprehensive descriptions provided by Kozár and Konczné Benedicty (2007) and Szita et al. (2020). For further details on the genus and a broader treatment of species, refer to these references.

Diagnosis.

Tritubular cerores (also referred to as tritubular pores or ducts) absent; bitubular cerores (bitubular pores/ducts) typically present, absent in some species; anal ring with or without elongate cells, lacking protuberances, and situated dorsally; body setae all flagellate, anal lobes usually poorly developed, bearing a set of 3 distinct long setae or with several short setae; trilocular pores present but never arranged in tight clusters on the venter; body oval to spherical and membranous; antennae geniculate with 5 or 6 segments.

Comments.

In Kozár and Konczné Benedicty (2007) and Szita et al. (2020), species that lack bitubular cerores but are otherwise morphologically similar to the generic type species, R. rumicis (Maskell), have been tentatively placed in Ripersiella . We maintain the established precedent here. However, it is important to note that Choi and Lee (2022), in their phylogenetic analysis of mealybug clades, failed to recover a monophyletic Ripersiella , and our own preliminary phylogenomic analyses (unpublished data) show similar results. It is therefore likely that some or all of the new species described here will eventually require a change of combination corresponding with a revision of Rhizoecidae that is informed through both their morphology and molecular phylogenetic analysis.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Rhizoecidae

Loc

Ripersiella Tinsley, 1899

Schneider, Scott A. & LaPolla, John S. 2022
2022
Loc

Pararhizoecus

Goux 1941
1941
Loc

Ripersiella

Tinsley 1899
1899
Loc

Ripersia rumicis

Maskell 1892
1892