Alopecurus myosuroides, Populations

Dücker, Rebecka, Parcharidou, Evlampia & Beffa, Roland, 2020, Flufenacet activity is affected by GST inhibitors in blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) populations with reduced flufenacet sensitivity and higher expression levels of GSTs, Weed Science (Cambridge, England) 68 (5), pp. 451-459 : 452-457

Dose-Response of Different Alopecurus myosuroides Populations to Flufenacet

Four populations were selected for a dose–response bioassay: the sensitive A. myosuroides populations ‘Herbiseed-S’ (Herbiseed, Twyford, UK) and ‘Appel-S’ (Appels Wilde Samen, Darmstadt, Germany); an A. myosuroides field population from the northern Germany marsh region of Kehdingen (Kehdingen1), which was previously described to be significantly less susceptible to flufenacet due to enhanced metabolism ( Dücker et al. 2019b); and another population from the same region, suspected to be more difficult to control (Kehdingen2). The seedlings were sown in tissue culture containers (MP Biomedicals, Eschwege, Germany) on 0.7% agar Type A ( Sigma-Aldrich , Steinheim , Germany) containing KNO3 ( Sigma-Aldrich ) at a concentration of 0.02 M. The seeds were kept in the dark at 4 C for 5 d and were then placed in a greenhouse for germination. The greenhouse was set to 22/16 C day/night conditions with a 14-h photoperiod provided by Master HPI-T plus 400W/645 E40 metal-halide lamps ( Philips , Amsterdam , The Netherlands) at approximately 200 μmol m −2 s −1. As the primordial root emerged, 15 seedlings per population and treatment were transplanted into pots containing sandy loam with 2.2% organic matter (three pots with five seedlings each). The seedlings were covered with a thin layer of coarse sand and treated on the same day with 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.3, 15.6, 7.8, 4.0, and 0 g flufenacet ha −1 formulated as Cadouº SC using a laboratory track sprayer with a single flat spray nozzle (TeeJetº nozzle XR8001, 300 L ha −1, 200 kPa). The sprayed seedlings were irrigated from above after treatment and grown for 3 wk under the previously described greenhouse conditions. The aboveground fresh weight was assessed, and the dose-response data were analyzed as a completely randomized experiment using the three-parameter log-logistic model of the DRC package in R software (RStudio v. 3.5.0) ( Ritz et al. 2015). The equation with parameters b (relative slope around the inflection point), d (upper limit), and e (inflection point) was used (Equation 1). The experiment was repeated once.

d f ð x Þ ¼ [1] 1 þ exp f b ½ log ð x Þ — log ð e Þ]g

Flufenacet Degradation in Alopecurus myosuroides Seedlings with High and Reduced Flufenacet Sensitivity after Treatment with Selected GST Inhibitors

The seedlings of the populations Herbiseed-S, Appel-S, Kehdingen1, and Kehdingen2 were grown in tissue culture containers as described earlier until the first leaf reached about 2.5 cm in length. Initially, a phytotoxicity test was conducted to determine symptom-free dose rates of flufenacet and the GST inhibitors tridiphane (Dr. Ehrenstorfer, Augsburg, Germany), chloro-7- nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD-Cl, Sigma-Aldrich), triphenyltin chloride (TPT-Cl, abcr GmbH, Kalsruhe, Germany), ethacrynic acid (Alfa Aesar, Wand Hill, MA, USA), and diethyl maleate (Acros Organics, Beijing, China), as well as malathion, a frequently used inhibitor of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CYPs; Sigma-Aldrich). Then, 32 seedlings per inhibitor treatment and population were incubated in 20-ml scintillation vials containing 1.2 ml of commercial water (Volvic =) with KNO3 at a concentration of 0.02 M and 14C-radiolabeled flufenacet at a concentration of 15 μM and 16.7 kBq ml −1. Treatments were tridiphane (10 mM), NBD-Cl (10 μM), triphenyltin chloride (1 μM), ethacrynic acid (1 mM), diethyl maleate (100 μM), and malathion (10 mM), with a flufenacet-only control. These 32 seedlings were incubated for 24 h in a growth chamber at 22/16 C day/night conditions with a 14-h photoperiod provided by Master TL-D 58W/840 REFLEX fluorescent lamps (Philips) at approximately 400 μmol m −2 s −1. The seedlings were washed two times in water and one time in 50% acetone. Four times for each treatment, including the control, eight of these 32 seedlings were pooled to one sample to obtain sufficiently high signals, leading to four pooled samples in total. These were extracted and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography as described by Dücker et al. (2019a). The percentages of metabolized flufenacet recovered from differently treated seedlings were analyzed with a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks using SigmaPlot v. 13.0 (Systat Software, San José, CA, USA). Differences between two populations with the same treatment were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test included in the R software (RStudio v. 3.5.0). The experiment was repeated once, and the data were pooled for the analysis.

Illumina Transcriptome Sequencing of Alopecurus myosuroides Seedlings with High and Reduced Flufenacet Sensitivity

For an RNA-seq study, the seeds of the populations Herbiseed-S, Appel-S, Kehdingen1, and Kehdingen2 were sterilized for 5 min in 5% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed five times with sterile demineralized water. The seeds were dried on filter paper and sown in tissue culture containers (MP Biomedicals) under sterile conditions. The containers were filled with 30 ml of sterile 2-mm glass beads, 30 ml of sterile 4-mm glass beads, and 12 ml of sterile commercial water (VolvicTM) with KNO3 at a concentration of 0.02 M. The containers were kept in the dark at 4 C for 5 d and were then transferred into a climate chamber under the conditions described earlier. The seedlings were grown until the first leaf reached a length of about 2.5 cm. To assess constitutive differences between the biotypes, the untreated seeds were removed from the containers, and each six individual whole seedlings per population were immediately frozen at −80 C.

The frozen seedlings were ground in a Tissue Lyser II swing mill (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at 30 Hz for 30 s in 2-ml reaction tubes each containing three tungsten carbide beads (3 mm). The ground tissue was suspended in standard buffer (RLT) provided with the Qiagen RNeasy Kit (Qiagen), and total RNA extraction was performed according to the manufacturer’ s instructions, including an on-column DNase treatment with an RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). High-quality RNA was assured (RIN scores> 7) using the RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) as defined in the manufacturer’ s instructions. cDNA libraries were obtained using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The multiplexed cDNA libraries were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencer (Illumina). Each library was measured on three lanes to obtain paired-end reads of 150-bp length in high-output mode, providing three technical replicates per biological replicate.

RNA-seq Analysis

The reads were demultiplexed using an in-house script by Fasteris (Geneva, Switzerland). The obtained paired-end reads were trimmed and mapped against an A. myosuroides reference transcriptome assembled with Illumina reads by Gardin et al. (2015) using BWA with the maximal exact matches (MEM) algorithm ( Li 2013) (BWA v. 7.12) within the Genedata Expressionist Refiner Genome software (v. 9.5; Genedata, Basel, Switzerland). The reads were trimmed mean of M values (TMM) normalized in order to robustly equate the overall expression levels of genes between samples under the assumption that the majority of them are not differentially expressed ( Robinson and Oshlack 2010). A pairwise differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the exact test of edgeR provided by the Blast2GO PRO software v. 4.1.9 ( Conesa et al. 2005). Candidate genes were selected with the following cutoff criteria: false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05 and log fold-change ≥ 2. The probable function of the candidate genes was annotated using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool X (BLASTx; Camacho et al. 2009) against the National Center for Biotechnology Information non-redundant database. Protein sequence similarities between the candidate contigs and Am GSTF1 ( Cummins et al. 2013) were determined through global pairwise alignments using the EMBOSS Needle algorithms (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_needle).

Results and Discussion

To better understand the mechanisms of flufenacet detoxification in A. myosuroides , we used dose− response bioassays to characterize the four A. myosuroides populations, Herbiseed-S, Appel-S, Kehdingen1, and Kehdingen2 ( Figure 1 ). The sensitive reference populations Herbiseed-S and Appel-S had effective dose rates 50 (ED50 values) of 4.3 ± 0.8 (P <0.01) and 5.7 g ± 1.3 (P <0.01) flufenacet ha−1, respectively. They were more susceptible than the northern Germany field populations Kehdingen1 and Kehdingen2, which had ED50 values of 14.4 ± 3.4 (P <0.01) and 24.0 g ± 2.2 (P <0.01) flufenacet ha −1, respectively. A 5.6-fold increase in herbicide rate required to inhibit growth by 50% was calculated for population Kehdingen2. The sensitivity of this population to flufenacet was significantly lower than the sensitivity of the reference populations Herbiseed-S and Appel-S. Kehdingen1, however, only differed significantly from Herbiseed-S. Sufficient control with the field rate of 250 g flufenacet ha−1 was indicated with ED90 values between 16.2 and 102.9 g flufenacet ha−1 for all populations tested under favorable conditions. This relatively low level of reduction in sensitivity is in accordance with previously published studies ( Dücker et al. 2019b; Hull and Moss 2012; Rosenhauer and Petersen 2015) and may result from cross-resistance to other herbicide chemistries or may directly be selected by flufenacet applications. Reduced sensitivity to various herbicides was previously described for populations from the marsh regions of northern Germany, the origin of the populations characterized in this study ( Dücker et al. 2019b; Rosenhauer and Petersen 2015) and may result from non–target site resistance.

Enhanced metabolism has previously been found as the dominant form of non–target site resistance to flufenacet in A. myosuroides as well as in Lolium spp. ( Dücker et al. 2019a, 2019b). The results of the experiment with different potentially synergistic inhibitors in this study point in the same direction. To test the effects of different chemicals on the performance of flufenacet, seedlings of the sensitive A. myosuroides population Herbiseed-S and the less susceptible field population Kehdingen1 were treated with 14C-radiolabeled flufenacet in the absence and presence of different inhibitors of GSTs and the insecticide and inhibitor of CYPs and acetylcholinesterase malathion. After 24 h, on average, 37.9% of unmetabolized flufenacet was recovered from the sensitive population Herbiseed-S and 21.9% of unmetabolized flufenacet was recovered from seedlings of the less susceptible population Kehdingen1, treated with flufenacet only ( Figure 2 ). Based on a t -test (P ≤ 0.05), population Kehdingen1 degraded flufenacet significantly faster than population Herbiseed-S in all treatments, except for the treatment with malathion.

A comparison of flufenacet degradation rates revealed that the detoxification in the populations Herbiseed-S and Kehdingen1 was affected to different extents by treatments with selected GST inhibitors and the CYP inhibitor malathion ( Figure 2 ). Only seedlings of population Herbiseed-S treated with triphenyltin-chloride degraded flufenacet on average faster than seedlings of this population treated with flufenacet only. In all other treatments, the average degradation rate was slower in comparison to treatments with flufenacet only. While the differences were not statistically significant for seedlings treated with diethyl maleate and NBD-Cl, slower flufenacet degradation resulting from treatments with the GST inhibitors tridiphane and ethacrynic acid was statistically supported by a Kruskal-Wallis test. Interestingly, treatments with the CYP inhibitor malathion also led to significantly reduced flufenacet degradation rates in population Kehdingen1, although hydroxylated phase I metabolites were not found in flufenacettreated A. myosuroides ( Dücker et al. 2019b) . Similar inhibitory effects were also described for Lolium spp. ( Parcharidou 2019) and in a recombinant phi-class GST originating from maize. In addition, the authors hypothesized that malathion binds to the substrate binding site of the tested GST isoform ( Kapoli et al. 2008). Diverse GST-inhibitory effects of malathion have previously been observed in other organisms such as rats ( Hazarika et al. 2003). However, further investigations are required to clarify whether the observed effect is a result of direct inhibition of GSTs or due to other effects of malathion.

In general, these results demonstrate the presence of an interaction between GST inhibitors and flufenacet as previously described for other herbicides detoxified by GSTs ( Cummins et al. 2013; Ezra et al. 1985). Moreover, they support previous findings by Dücker et al. (2019a, 2019b) suggesting enhanced GST activity as a key driver for a reduction in flufenacet sensitivity. The use of GST inhibitors as synergists for field applications, however, is generally problematic, as compounds such as ethacrynic acid inhibit GST classes expressed in humans, for example, alpha or pi class ( Huang et al. 2015) as well as plant-specific GSTs such as isoforms belonging to the phi or tau class.

While the inhibition of flufenacet degradation by tridiphane and ethacrynic acid consolidates the formulated hypothesis that flufenacet is detoxified by isoform(s) belonging to the superfamily of GSTs, it is not clear which isoforms of which class(es) are involved in the reduction of flufenacet sensitivity. Altogether 47 GST isoforms belonging to the classes tau (28), phi (13), theta (3), zeta (2), and lambda (2) were identified in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana ( Wagner et al. 2002) , and 79 putative GSTs belonging to the classes tau (52), phi (17), zeta (4), DHAR (2), EF1G (2), theta (1) and TCHQD (1) were identified in rice ( Oryza sativa L.) ( Jain et al. 2010). The large number of GST isoforms, as well as sequence similarities, complicates the identification of candidate GSTs in A. myosuroides with traditional methods like real-time PCR. This may particularly apply to the larger classes tau and phi, which have probably undergone extensive gene-duplication events after divergence of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants ( Monticolo et al. 2017). Therefore, an RNA-seq approach was chosen for identification of candidate genes conferring reduction in flufenacet sensitivity in A. myosuroides by investigating differences in constitutive gene expression among populations with a shift in sensitivity.

A differential gene expression analysis was used to identify transcriptomic differences between the sensitive populations Herbiseed-S and Appel-S and the less susceptible populations Kehdingen1 and Kehdingen2. This revealed 319 gene-associated contigs with significantly higher expression and 218 gene-associated contigs with significantly lower expression as potential candidate genes conferring differences in flufenacet susceptibility. Annotations of detoxification-associated functions were most abundant among the set of more highly expressed contigs, indicating a constitutive upregulation of detoxification pathways. In addition to 15 glucosyltransferases and 7 CYPs, 6 GSTs (7 contigs) were found among the most frequent annotations ( Figure 3 ). Furthermore, 9 significantly more highly expressed contigs were annotated as different transcription factors. Additionally, further transcription- and translation-related functions such as zinc finger domains, several kinases, a ribosome-binding factor, a mitochondrial RNA helicase, and chaperones were significantly more highly expressed. The higher expression of this group of genes indicates a complex change in gene expression patterns in the less sensitive populations that may play a role in the reduced sensitivity in the populations of interest.

Interestingly, one of the significantly more highly expressed contigs, although with relatively low TMM values, was annotated as β- ketoacyl-CoA reductase1 (KCR1). KCR1 is part of the VLCFA elongase complex, which additionally consist of a enoyl-CoAreductase, a β- hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase, and ketoacyl-CoAsynthases, the family of enzymes that represents the putative site of action of flufenacet and catalyze the first and rate-limiting step of the elongation of VLCFAs ( Haslam and Kunst 2013; Trenkamp et al. 2004). This observation leads to the hypothesis that a higher production rate of VLCFAs may lead to reduced sensitivity of weed populations treated with herbicides inhibiting the synthesis of VLCFAs. The combination of higher flufenacet detoxification rates and possibly a change in the VLCFA elongation complex can lead to a decrease in flufenacet sensitivity.

Among the set of 218 contigs with significantly lower expression levels, the largest group of contigs with similar BLASTx annotations contained contigs coding for receptor-like kinases, which may play a role in signal transduction or the regulation of transcription factors. In addition, each three of these contigs were annotated as mitochondrial elongation factors and GSTs, while all other annotations occurred less frequently. Contigs annotated as the typical housekeeping gene actin (e.g., contigs alomy11359 or alomy027178) were not among the set of differentially expressed genes and typically showed homogenous expression patterns.

Based on the results of the interaction study with GST inhibitors ( Figure 2 ) and previous findings on the detoxification pathway of flufenacet in A. myosuroides ( Dücker et al. 2019b) , the GSTs with significantly higher expression levels in population Kehdingen2 were selected as candidate genes. The open reading frames of seven GSTs with significantly higher levels of expression were identified. Based on their amino acid sequences, four were identified as GSTs belonging to class tau, two as phi-class GSTs, and one as a thetaclass GST ( Table 1 ). As two of the contigs coding for tau-class GSTs had an amino acid similarity of 100%, only the longer contig was chosen for further analysis.

The analysis of the expression patterns of the six candidate GSTs revealed that all of them were more highly expressed in populations Kehdingen1 and Kehdingen2. In all six cases, the level of expression was significantly higher in population Kehdingen 2 in comparison to the sensitive population Herbiseed-S. Only the level of expression of GST2 (tau) was also significantly higher in population Kehdingen 1 in comparison to the sensitive populations. This suggests a generally higher expression level of detoxificationrelated genes or pathway(s) in population Kehdingen2 and is in accordance with the resistance level characterized in the dose– response bioassay. However, the expression levels differed from contig to contig. While GST1 (tau), GST2 (tau), GST4 (phi), and GST5 (phi) achieved relatively high expression levels, particularly in individuals of population Kehdingen2, GST3 (tau) and GST6 (theta) were expressed at low levels, with TMM values below 100 ( Figure 4 ). Finally, Am GSTF1, which is frequently associated with metabolic herbicide resistance in A. myosuroides , was not among the candidate GSTs (sequence similarities <44.5% with local alignment; Table 1 ). This isoform was the only commonly upregulated gene in a set of multiple-resistant A. myosuroides analyzed in an RNA-seq experiment conducted by Tétard-Jones et al. (2018), indicating upregulation of different pathways in different multiple-resistant populations. Yet all of these genes may play minor or major roles in flufenacet detoxification by glutathione conjugation, as indicated by the inhibitor tests and the metabolites identified in A. myosuroides and flufenacet-tolerant crops ( Bieseler et al. 1997; Dücker et al. 2019b).

However, in addition to their classical function of glutathione conjugation and their role in detoxification, GSTs can fulfill several other roles in plants that may indirectly decrease the activity of herbicides in A. myosuroides plants. These roles include their function as ligandins (e.g., for the auxin indole-3-acetic acid; Bilang and Sturm 1995; Sylvestre-Gonon et al. 2019) and additionally include their glutathione-dependent hyperoxidase activity ( Axarli et al. 2009). The catalytic and noncatalytic functions of GSTs are involved in tolerance to abiotic stresses, regulation of antioxidants, pathogen defense, or signaling ( Cummins et al. 2013; Gullner et al. 2018; Kumar and Trivedi 2018; Marrs 1996; Nianiou-Obeidat et al. 2017). Thus, it has been confirmed that various plant GSTs are induced by environmental factors such as pathogens, xenobiotics, metals, drought, and cold, as well as phytohormone production or oxidative stress, which typically accompany the environmental factors ( Gullner et al. 2018; Lallement et al. 2014; Marrs 1996; Nianiou-Obeidat et al. 2017; Sylvestre-Gonon et al. 2019).

The regulation of GST expression in plants can be complex, as multiple transcription start points can be present ( Thatcher et al. 2007) and multiple regulatory elements can be present in the promoter regions of GSTs. For example, in the promoter region of the rice GST Os GSTL2, several stress-regulated cis elements such as Box-W1, EIRE, or LTR or elements responding to phytohormones such as TCA, CGTCA-motif, or ERE have been found. Similarly, the presence of ABRE and MYB in the promoter region of a tau-class GST of the succulent Salicornia brachiata Roxb. ( Tiwari et al. 2016) indicates concurrent binding of different transcription factors ( Hu et al. 2011).

The regulation of GST expression in weeds has so far only been described in a limited number of detailed studies ( Brazier-Hicks et al. 2018; Wei et al. 2019). There is, however, evidence that posttranscriptional modifications play a role in resistance-related gene expression ( Nandula et al. 2019; Tétard-Jones et al. 2018).

The regulation of GST expression, in particular the roles of the significantly more highly and less expressed transcription factors and their potential to interact with DNA binding domains for the expression of the identified candidate GSTs, remains to be investigated in the A. myosuroides populations studied here, which would require analyses of the genomic sequences. Further analysis of epigenetic modifications (e.g., methylation) of the GST promoters, which could modify gene expression ( Gressel 2009; Schnekenburger et al. 2014), is also required.

Differentially expressed genes such as the set of receptor-like kinases with significantly lower expression levels may play a role in differential flufenacet susceptibility. With more than 600 isoforms identified in Arabidopsis and more than 1,100 isoforms identified in rice, these kinases belong to the largest family of receptors in plants ( Shiu et al. 2004). The functions of these signaling proteins range from pathogen response via morphological development to functions involved in processes such as selfincompatibility ( Morillo and Tax 2006; Shpak et al. 2004; Stein et al. 1991; Tang et al. 2017). Receptor-like kinase-mediated signaling can activate and repress signaling pathways and is affected by multiple interactions of extracellular domains ( Jaillais et al. 2011; Smakowska-Luzan et al. 2018). While some kinases can affect gene expression (e.g., by phosphorylation of transcription factors; Sirichandra et al. 2010), the role of these differentially expressed receptor-like kinases remains unclear.

Finally, the reduction of flufenacet detoxification in the presence of the GST inhibitors ethacrynic acid and tridiphane and the detection of six significantly more highly expressed GSTs provide further evidence concerning the role of GSTs in the detoxification of flufenacet and, thereby, the similarity of mechanisms in crops and grass weeds. Additional research is needed to validate the detected candidate genes involved in reduced flufenacet sensitivity in A. myosuroides . The availability of full cDNA sequences and genomic sequences will allow characterization of the biochemical function of the selected genes as well as a better understanding of regulation of their expression ( Ravet et al. 2018). This will provide a better understanding of the evolution of herbicide resistance and the prediction of cross-resistance patterns. The implementation of agricultural practices to slow down or even avoid the evolution of flufenacet resistance is becoming increasingly important. This is particularly the case because the maximum field rate of flufenacet may be significantly reduced, as proposed in Europe, increasing the potential risk of sublethal dose rates selecting for non–target site resistance in the future. The knowledge of the detoxification pathways of the different herbicides and the genes involved will help to (1) set specific resistance diagnostics and (2) define the best mixture strategies, either by application of tank mixtures, premixed products, or sequential treatments.

Figures

Figure 1. Dose–response analysis of the fresh weight of four Alopecurus myosuroides populations treated with different dose rates of flufenacet estimated using a threeparameter log-logistic model (see Equation 1).

Figure 2. Flufenacet degradation 24 h after treatment with different inhibitors in the sensitive Alopecurus myosuroides population Herbiseed-S (A) and population Kehdingen1 with reduced flufenacet efficacy (B).Different letters indicate significant differences in flufenacet degradation between treatments,and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the two populations for each treatment (P ≤ 0.05).

Figure 3. Most frequent BLASTx annotations of contigs with differential expression.(A) Most frequent annotations with higher expression levels in Alopecurus myosuroides populations from Kehdingen,Germany,including a β-ketoacyl-CoA reductase1 (KCR1); and (B) most frequent annotations with higher expression levels in A.myosuroides populations from Kehdingen.

Figure 4. Expression of three tau-class glutathione transferases (GST1,GST2,GST3),two phi-class GSTs (GST4,GST5),and a theta-class isoform (GST6) differentially expressed in the sensitive Alopecurus myosuroides populations Herbiseed-S and Appel-S and the populations Kehdingen1 and Kehdingen2 with reduced flufenacet efficacy. Different letters indicate significant differences between populations (false discovery rate ≤ 0.05). TMM, trimmed mean of M values.

Tables

Table 1. Similarities of amino acid sequences of AmGSTF1 and the contigs of three tau-class glutathione transferases (GST1, GST2,GST3), two phi-class GSTs (GST4, GST5), and a theta-class isoform (GST6) with their contig names as published in the reference transcriptome by Gardin et al. (2015).

Contig description	Sequence similarities between contigs of different GSTs %
Contig name	GST class	GST name	GST1	GST2	GST3	GST4	GST5	GST6	Am GSTF1
Alomy040330	Tau	GST1	—
Alomy042368	Tau	GST2	74.2	—
Alomy056271	Tau	GST3	52.7	61.9	—
Alomy071497	Phi	GST4	22.8	25.9	28	—
Alomy085325	Phi	GST5	20.6	15.7	19.9	5.7	—
ALomy020490	Theta	GST6	22.9	24.8	14.7	10.1	5	—
—	Phi	Am GSTF1	31	35.5	31.3	44.5	27	19.2	—