Horniella confragosa Yin and Li

Yin, Zi-Wei & Li, Li-Zhen, 2014, Revision of the Oriental genus Horniella Raffray (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae), Zootaxa 3850 (1), pp. 1-83 : 14-17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3850.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFD1F483-4255-429B-9E17-8D4A9E559C5F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6142721

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD490758-D81D-FFFB-FF01-41634037FCBA

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Horniella confragosa Yin and Li
status

sp. nov.

2. Horniella confragosa Yin and Li , new species

Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 B, 5–6; Map 1 View MAP 1

Type material (2 ♂♂). Holotype, ♂, labeled ‘ CHINA: Guangxi Prov., Xing’an County, Maoershan Mountain , 11.vii.2011, 2,000 m, W.J. He & L. Tang leg. [25°52’12’’N, 110°24’56’’E, leaf litter, sifted] / HOLOTYPE [red], ♂, Horniella confragosa sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, SNUC’ GoogleMaps . Paratype, 1 ♂, labeled ‘ China: E. Guizhou, Leishan County, Leigong Shan N. R., nr. Queniao Tea Plantation , 26°24’29’’N, 108°13’42’’E, leaf litter, sifted, ca. 645 m, 4.v.2013, Shu-Lin Yang leg. / PARATYPE [yellow], ♂, Horniella confragosa sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, SNUC’. GoogleMaps

Description. Male ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 B). Length 3.69–3.86 mm. Head about as long as wide, HL 0.74–0.79 mm, HW 0.78–0.79 mm; anterolateral genal projections ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 C, 6C) distinct, anterior margins nearly rounded; median sulcus between antennal tubercles broad, short, and shallow; scapes ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 B, 6B) distinctly expanded at basolateral margins; clubs ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A, 6A) loosely formed by apical three moderately enlarged antennomeres; venter with pair of thick lateral spines ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 D, 6D). Maxillary palpomeres II stout, broadened at middle. Each eye composed of about 36 facets. Pronotum slightly longer than wide, PL 0.76–0.79 mm, PW 0.71–0.74 mm. Elytra wider than long, EL 1.00– 1.02 mm, EW 1.42–1.44 mm; discal striae reaching about apical 2/3 of elytral length. Protrochanters and profemora ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 E, 6E) each with one distinct ventral spine, protibiae ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 F, 6F) simple; mesotrochanters ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 G, 6G) each with one ventral spine, mesofemora simple, mesotibiae ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 H, 6H) each with preapical row of small denticles on mesal margin; tarsomeres II normal, not extending to beneath tarsomeres III. Abdomen large, AL 1.19–1.26 mm, AW 1.43–1.44 mm, tergite IV (first visible tergite) with median and discal carinae short (Population from Maoer Shan) to absent (Population from Leigong Shan), tergite V lacking median carina. Sternite IX ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 I, 6I) nearly oval, with well-sclerotized apical half and membranous basal half. AeL 0.77–0.79 mm; aedeagus ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 J–L, 6 J–L) with greatly asymmetric median lobe, right half of median lobe greatly protruding apicad, apex pointed in dorso-ventral view; endophallus composed of two elongate sclerites that partially overlap.

Female. Unknown.

Differential diagnosis. This species is placed as a member of the H. centralis group. The males are externally similar to H. sichuanica and H. tianmuensis by sharing the nearly rounded apical margin of anterolateral genal projections, the distinctly expanded basolateral margins of the scapes, and similar placement of spines on the fore and mid legs. Horniella confragosa can be separated from H. sichuanica by the position of apical projection of aedeagal median lobe, which is on the right half, while H. sichuanica has the left half of aedeagal median lobe protruding apicad; H. confragosa can be separated from H. tianmuensis only by the more distinctly pointed apex of the aedeagal median lobe, and the much shorter sclerites of the endophallus.

Comments. Males of the populations from Mao’er Shan and Leigong Shan have a few slight differences, but are otherwise indistinguishable morphologically. The distance between their localities measures about 225 km, with no obvious geographical barriers between them. The difference in the presence/absence of discal carinae on tergite IV, and in lengths of the sclerites of the aedeagal endophallus are more likely attributed to intraspecific variation rather than species characteristics. Since only a single male is currently available for each locality, we choose a conservative approach here, and provisionally place these populations under the same species, pending access to more material from around or between the two localities.

Distribution. South China: Guangxi; Southwest China: Guizhou ( Map 1 View MAP 1 ).

Collection notes. Adults were collected by sifting leaf litter in mixed forests.

Etymology. The specific name ‘ confragosa ’ means ‘difficult, hard’, referring to the difficulty in determining the relationship between the populations from Mao’er Shan and Leigong Shan.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF