Epeolus Latreille, 1802
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.755.23939 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AADE1478-7C91-4355-B776-C4AEF28347BF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CC982592-9A3D-C449-FFEE-7ADE1F328053 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Epeolus Latreille, 1802 |
status |
|
Epeolus Latreille, 1802 View in CoL
Epeolus Latreille, 1802: 427. Type species: Apis variegata Linnaeus, 1758, by monotypy.
Trophocleptria Holmberg, 1886: 233, 275. Type species: Trophocleptria variolosa Holmberg, 1886, by monotypy.
Epeolus (Diepeolus) Gribodo, 1894: 80. Type species: Epeolus giannellii Gribodo, 1894, by monotypy.
Epeolus (Monoepeolus) Gribodo, 1894: 80. Type species: Apis variegata Linnaeus, by monotypy.
Pyrrhomelecta Ashmead, 1899: 66. Type species: Epeolus glabratus Cresson, 1878, by original designation and monotypy.
Argyroselenis Robertson, 1903: 284. Type species: Triepeolus minimus Robertson, 1902, by original designation and monotypy.
Oxybiastes Mavromoustakis, 1954: 260. Type species: Oxybiastes bischoffi Mavromoustakis, 1954, by original designation and monotypy.
Remarks.
In his original description, Latreille (1802) did not explain the etymology of Epeolus , but it seems likely that the name is a diminutive of Epeus/Epeius, the soldier in Greek mythology to whom building the Trojan Horse is attributed, and that it was inspired by the sinister nature of these cleptoparasitic bees. This was the first genus of Epeolini described, and ‘epeolus’ has since become the root in the names of many other nomadine and non-nomadine genera and tribes (e.g., Epeoloides Giraud ( Osirini ), Parepeolus Ducke ( Osirini ), Protepeolini , Pseudepeolus Holmberg ( Epeolini ), etc.).
Several species of Epeolus were previously described as belonging to different genera, in particular Triepeolus . On account of Rightmyer’s (2008) revision of Triepeolus , the generic placement of species that were once erroneously switched has been corrected. A few North American species were (initially or at some point in the past) described as belonging to genera that are no longer considered valid, including Argyroselenis Robertson, Phileremus (the name is a synonym of Ammobates Latreille subgenus Ammobates Latreille s. str. in Michener 2007), and Pyrrhomelecta Ashmead. These represented unnatural groupings of species by shared homoplasious morphological features: if the fore wing has two submarginal cells ( Phileremus ) instead of the usual three, if the maxillary palpus is three-segmented ( Argyroselenis ) rather than two-segmented (both states occur within Epeolus and Thalestriina , Rightmyer 2004), and if there is extensive red versus black integument coloration and reduced pubescence ( Pyrrhomelecta ).
Species of Epeolus are small to moderate-sized (body length 5.5-10.0 mm) relatively robust cleptoparasitic (epeoliform) bees. In North America, Epeolus may be confused with Triepeolus , which it resembles in general appearance, although Triepeolus may attain a much larger size (body length up to 18 mm in some species, Rightmyer 2008). The only other North American epeoline genus, Odyneropsis Schrottky, is rare (known only from the American Southwest) ( Griswold and Parker 1999) and more likely to be confused with vespid wasps (hence the root ‘odynerus’) rather than Epeolus . Comprehensive overviews of the distinguishing features of Epeolus in reference to all other Epeolini are provided in Rightmyer (2004) and Michener (2007).
Diagnosis for Epeolus in North America
(Canada and the United States). Diagnostic for female Epeolus is a very distinct S6, which is usually retracted except sometimes for a pair of convergent spatulate lateral apical processes bearing setae modified into minute, pointed denticles ( Onuferko 2017, Fig. 2A, B). Basally, the processes are separated by a large lobe-like disc, which in Triepeolus is reduced to a narrow transverse bar. In both Triepeolus ( Onuferko 2017, Fig. 2C, D) and Odyneropsis , the lateral apical processes are subparallel and bear coarse, spine-like setae. Additionally, females may be separated on the basis of the pseudopygidial area (the apicomedial region of T5 that changes slope from the rest of the tergum), which in Epeolus is covered in a silvery band of short apically rounded setae. In Triepeolus , the pseudopygidial area is usually longer than in Epeolus and in most species the setae reflect a golden color. The T5 in female Odyneropsis is unique in that it is broadly notched posteriorly and has a distinct middorsal depressed area in the shape of a pointed oval outlined by ridges ( Rightmyer 2004, fig. 180A).
Male Epeolus are more difficult to diagnose. As in females, the body lacks integumental white or yellow areas but the mesosoma and usually other tagmata have short appressed plumose white and/or yellow setae; the maxillary palpus is two or three segmented; the inner margins of the compound eyes are distinctly convergent below; the axilla is produced to a rounded lobe or angle or spine (i.e., not continuing the contour of the mesoscutellum); the distitarsi of all legs have arolia; the fore wing usually has three submarginal cells (if with two, then the second is at least nearly as long as the first), and the marginal cell is apically removed from the wing margin and much longer than the stigma; and a pygidial plate is present. In male Epeolus , the pygidial plate in most species is broadly rounded posteriorly (Fig. 2B); in Odyneropsis and Triepeolus it is usually more elongate and with a median constriction (Fig. 2F). It should be noted that males of some species of Epeolus in North America (notably E. australis Mitchell, E. flavofasciatus Smith, and some males in the "americanus group") have a very narrow and distinctly Triepeolus -like pygidial plate (Fig. 2A, C, D), as opposed to the more broadly rounded/subtruncate pygidial plate typically associated with male Epeolus (Fig. 2B). The presence of a preapical tooth of the mandible (Fig. 3B, C, D, F) (often hidden from view because the mandibles are usually closed) confirms these and other species as Epeolus ; all Triepeolus and only some Epeolus (in North America E. ainsliei , E. erigeronis , E. ilicis , E. inornatus , and E. zonatus ) lack one (Fig. 3A, E) ( Rightmyer 2004).
List of species with their proposed common names
Epeolus ainsliei Crawford, 1932 - Ainslie’s epeolus
Epeolus americanus (Cresson, 1878) - American epeolus
Epeolus andriyi Onuferko, sp. n. - Andrew’s epeolus
Epeolus asperatus Cockerell, 1909 - rough epeolus
Epeolus attenboroughi Onuferko, sp. n. - Attenborough’s epeolus
Epeolus australis Mitchell, 1962 - southern epeolus
Epeolus autumnalis Robertson, 1902 - fall epeolus
Epeolus axillaris Onuferko, sp. n. - spiny epeolus
Epeolus banksi (Cockerell, 1907) - Banks’ epeolus
Epeolus barberiellus Cockerell, 1907 - Barber’s epeolus
Epeolus basili Onuferko, sp. n. - Basil’s epeolus
Epeolus bifasciatus Cresson, 1864 - two-banded epeolus
Epeolus brumleyi Onuferko, sp. n. - Brumley’s epeolus
Epeolus canadensis Mitchell, 1962 - Canada epeolus
Epeolus carolinus Mitchell, 1962 - Carolina epeolus
Epeolus chamaesarachae Onuferko, sp. n. - five eyes crowned epeolus
Epeolus compactus Cresson, 1878 - compact epeolus
Epeolus deyrupi Onuferko, sp. n. - Deyrup’s epeolus
Epeolus diadematus Onuferko, sp. n. - Texas crowned epeolus
Epeolus erigeronis Mitchell, 1962 - fleabane epeolus
Epeolus ferrarii Onuferko, sp. n. - Ferrari’s epeolus
Epeolus flavofasciatus Smith, 1879 - yellow-banded epeolus
Epeolus floridensis Mitchell, 1962 - Florida epeolus
Epeolus gibbsi Onuferko, sp. n. - Gibbs’ epeolus
Epeolus glabratus Cresson, 1878 - smooth epeolus
Epeolus howardi Mitchell, 1962 - Howard’s epeolus
Epeolus ilicis Mitchell, 1962 - holly epeolus
Epeolus inornatus Onuferko, sp. n. - inornate epeolus
Epeolus interruptus Robertson, 1900 - interrupted epeolus
Epeolus lectoides Robertson, 1901 - Eastern prized epeolus
Epeolus lectus Cresson, 1878 - Great Plains prized epeolus
Epeolus mesillae (Cockerell, 1895) - Mesilla epeolus
Epeolus minimus (Robertson, 1902) - least epeolus
Epeolus nebulosus Onuferko, sp. n. - clouded epeolus
Epeolus novomexicanus Cockerell, 1912 - New Mexico epeolus
Epeolus olympiellus Cockerell, 1904 - Olympia epeolus
Epeolus packeri Onuferko, sp. n. - Packer’s epeolus
Epeolus pusillus Cresson, 1864 - dwarf epeolus
Epeolus rufulus Cockerell, 1941 - reddish epeolus
Epeolus scutellaris Say, 1824 - shield-backed epeolus
Epeolus splendidus Onuferko, sp. n. - polished epeolus
Epeolus tessieris Onuferko, sp. n. - Tessier’s epeolus
Epeolus zonatus Smith, 1854 - white-banded red epeolus
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.