XENODERMIDAE Gray, 1849
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a22 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:07001ACA-EBDE-4256-BCB9-55E3159F81DC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4488526 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CB2D87E1-2E3E-FFCC-FEC5-4554FC09FA68 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
XENODERMIDAE Gray, 1849 |
status |
|
Family XENODERMIDAE Gray, 1849
Genus Xenodermus Reinhardt, 1836 or Bungarus Daudin, 1803
Sp. indet. ( Figs 6 View FIG ; 7 View FIG )
LOCALITY AND AGE. — Sherullah 9, Khordkabul basin, Afghanistan, late Miocene, late Vallesian-basal Turolian transition, MN10/11.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — Two incomplete vertebrae (AFG 1672, AFG 1673)
DESCRIPTION
These vertebrae are poorly preserved ( Figs 6 View FIG ; 7 View FIG ). They show a well-marked abrasion with rounded and polished surfaces affecting all vertebral structures: zygapophysis, neural spine and hypapophysis, most likely as a consequence of a water transport. These vertebrae display the bases of lateral laminae. These laminae originate from the interzygapophyseal ridges and anterolateral borders of the postzygapophyses. They extended horizontally; unfortunately, their shape and extent are unknown. The laminae do not contact the prezygapophyses. The vertebrae are rather depressed. The centrum seems to have a very worn hypapophysis.
COMMENTS
Such lateral laminae are present in rare snakes; among colubroids they occur only in a few colubrid genera (e.g. in the African genus Mehelya and some American dipsadids ( Bogert 1964; Hoffstetter & Gasc 1969; Sánchez-Martinez 2011) and in certain species of the elapid Bungarus ( Hoffstetter 1939; Slowinski 1994). Within Asian colubrids, only Xenodermus (now in Xenodermatidae a basal caenophidian Family placed ouside Colubridae [e.g. Vidal et al. 2007; Zaher et al. 2009; Pyron et al. 2011]) has vertebrae similar to those from Sherullah ( Bogert 1964). On the basis of the two available specimens, referral to either Xenodermus or Bungarus is difficult. However, the Sherullah vertebrae are depressed and the posterior median notch of the neural arch is well pronounced, which is more reminiscent of Bungarus . As a result, this snake might be referred to either Xenodermus ( Colubridae s.l.) or Bungarus (Elapidae) .
A Xenodermus -like snake was reported from the early (or middle?) Miocene of Thailand ( Rage & Ginsburg 1997), however, this material was not accompanied by any kind of figure. An indeterminate species of Bungarus was reported from the late Miocene of Pakistan by Head (2005); furthermore, a vertebra from the late Pleistocene-Holocene of Kurnool Cave, India, attributed to Serpentes indeterminate by Patnaik et al. (2008) is clearly a Bungarus vertebra. Today, both genera are restricted to Asia ( Xenodermus in southeastern Asia, Bungarus in Southern Asia).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
XENODERMIDAE Gray, 1849
Lapparent, France de, Bailon, Salvador, Augé, Marc Louis & Rage, Jean-Claude 2020 |
Xenodermus
Reinhardt 1836 |
Xenodermus
Reinhardt 1836 |
Xenodermus
Reinhardt 1836 |
ELAPIDAE
Boie 1827 |
Bungarus
Daudin 1803 |
Bungarus
Daudin 1803 |
Bungarus
Daudin 1803 |
Bungarus
Daudin 1803 |
Serpentes
Linnaeus 1758 |