Squalius verepi
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111677811 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17820595 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C85F87D2-FE05-FE51-2885-FA7EFD3DF834 |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Squalius verepi |
| status |
|
Common name. Tigris chub.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from S. lepidus in Persian Gulf basin by: ● upper lip projecting beyond lower lip / ○ posterior anal-margin convex / ● 39–46+1–2 lateral-line scales / ○ head blunt / ○ snout short / ○ dorsal head profile straight or slightly convex / ○ scale pockets along lateral midline densely covered by pigments forming a large grey or black crescent-shaped blotch, resulting in a very contrasted reticulate pattern / ○ anal rays orange in life / ○ anal with few or without black pigments in preserved individuals / ○ head length 27–30 % SL / ○ interorbital distance 35–45 % HL / ○ head depth 61–72 % HL / ○ posteriormost point of anal at tip of 3 rd or 5 th branched rays. Size up to 450 mm SL.
Distribution. Tigris and Karun drainages.
Conservation status. LC.
Remarks. Molecular data suggest that this species is closely related to S. orientalis from the eastern Black Sea basin, and both may be conspecific. However, S. turcicus usually has dark-grey fins, whereas S. orientalis has orange fins, and the prominent vertical black bar behind the opercle in S. orientalis is absent in S. turcicus . Further research is needed to determine whether this is one or two species. Molecular characters differentiate the Kura and Aras chubs well. The species from the Kura is identified as S. agdamicus , and the one from the Aras is S. turcicus , but their morphological characters still need to be better studied. More research is required to distinguish the two species and understand their range.
Further reading. Bayçelebi 2019 (description, distribution).
Habitat. Small- to medium-sized streams, mostly in mountains and hilly areas.
Biology. No data.
Conservation status. LC.
Remarks. In medium-sized rivers often in sympatry with S. lepidus , which inhabits mostly large rivers. Both species occasionally hybridise as mitochondrial DNA of S. lepidus is often found in S. verepi , and there are populations with intermediate morphological character states. Individuals “difficult to identify” by characters given could be such hybrids. Morphological characters proposed to distinguish S. verepi from S. berak could not be confirmed and both are also indistinguishable by their COI sequences. Only few unpublished genomic data indicate that S. verepi might be a valid species. Further reading. Turan 2022 (description).
Hybrid between Squalius verepi and S. lepidus ; upper Tigris drainage, Türkiye; 120 mm SL. Spring Karamusa near Tefenni in Türkiye is one of the few habitats of Turcichondrostoma fahirae . The spring is dammed and used as a reservoir for pumping.
Turcichondrostoma fahirae ; Karapinar spring, Türkiye; ~ 80 mm SL.
| COI |
University of Coimbra Botany Department |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
