Nisotra nigripes Jacoby, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1205.121928 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:959F762C-4DFB-4693-BC95-BDB9E8E8249C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12613531 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C75CAED3-ED91-5BE5-B415-13D9F8CBFA3F |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Nisotra nigripes Jacoby |
status |
|
Figs 6 O, P View Figure 6 , 13 View Figure 13 , 14 View Figure 14
Type.
Holotype (sex undetermined, based on photographs, MCZC, fixed by monotypy) (Fig. 2 O, P View Figure 2 ): “ Ruby Mines / U. B. [p, w] // Type [p] / 18565 [h, r] // Nisotra / nigripes / Jac. [h, b] ”.
Additional material examined.
Laos. Vientiane: 1 ♂ ( NHMUK), 1 km W Vang Vieng , 15. VIII. 2004, leg. M. Geiser ; Myanmar. 3 ♀ ( NHMUK), Toungoo , coll. Andrewes, 1922-221 ; 1 ♂ ( NHMUK), Ruby Mines , leg. Doherty, Fry Coll., 1905.100 ; Kachin State: 2 ♂, 2 ♀ ( NHMUK), Nam Tamai , 2. VIII. 1938, leg. R. Kaulback ; Naga: 1 ♂, 1 ♀ ( SEHU), Somura , 1–2. V. 2005, leg. A. Abe ; Taiwan. Chiayi: 1 ♂ ( KMNH), Fenchihu (奮起湖), 12. IV. 1965, leg. T. Saigusa ; Hsinchu: 6 ♂, 2 ♀ ( TARI), Tahunshan (大混山), 24. II. 2009, leg. S. - F. Yu ; 1 ♂ ( TARI), Talu trail (大鹿林道), 22. X. 2008, leg. H. - J. Chen ; Kaohsiung: 1 ♀ ( TARI), Chungchihkuan (中之關), 16. IV. 2012, leg. L. - P. Hsu ; 2 ♀ ( KMNH), Liu Kui (六龜), 31. III. 1986, leg. K. Baba ; 2 ♂, 3 ♀ ( TARI), Namahsia (納瑪夏), 1. IX. 2012, leg. Y. - T. Chung ; 1 ♀ ( TARI), Peitawushan (北大武山), 27. V. 2013, leg. Y. - T. Chung ; 2 ♀ ( TARI), same but with “ 1. IX. 2016 ” ; 1 ♂ ( TARI), Shihshan logging trail (石山林道), 1–3. X. 2008, leg. M. - H. Tsao ; 2 ♂, 3 ♀ ( TARI), Tengchih (藤枝), 2–5. VI. 2008, leg. C. - F. Lee ; 1 ♂ ( TARI), same locality, 8. VI. 2013, leg. W. - C. Liao ; Nantou: 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ( NMNS), Hsitou (溪頭), 21. VIII. 2006, leg. W. T. Jin ; 1 ♂ ( KMNH), Lushan Wenchuan (廬山溫泉), 6. VI. 1976, leg. H. Makihara ; 1 ♂ ( TARI), same locality, 27–31. V. 1980, leg. K. S. Lin & L. Y. Chou ; 3 ♂, 2 ♀ ( TARI), Tungpu (東埔), 28. IV. – 2. V. 1981, leg. T. Lin & C. J. Lee ; 1 ♀ ( TARI), same locality, 18–23. XI. 1981, leg. T. Lin & W. S. Tang ; 1 ♂, 3 ♀ ( TARI), same locality, 19–23. VII. 1982, leg. L. Y. Chou & T. Lin ; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ ( TARI), same locality, 16–20. IV. 1984, leg. K. C. Chou & C. H. Yung ; 1 ♂, 6 ♀ ( TARI), same locality, 23–27. VII. 1984, leg. K. C. Chou & C. H. Yang ; Pingtung: 6 ♂, 4 ♀ ( TARI), Laii (來義), 23. IV. 2008, leg. W. - T. Liu ; 2 ♂, 4 ♀ ( TARI), Wutai (霧台), 12. IV. 2009, leg. U. Ong ; Taichung: 1 ♂ ( TARI), Chiapotai (佳保台), 14–18. X. 1980, leg. K. S. Lin & C. H. Wang ; Taitung: 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ( KMNH), Chipen (知本), 10. VIII. 1966, leg. H. Kamiya ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀ ( TARI), Lichialintao (利嘉林道), 24. IV. 2008, leg. C. - L. Hsiao ; 2 ♂, 1 ♀ ( TARI), Liyuan (栗園), 28. III. 2014, leg. W. - C. Huang ; Thailand. Siam: 2 ♀ ( KMNH), Tak, 20. VIII. 1961 .
Redescription.
Adults. Length 3.6–4.4 mm, width 2.3–2.7 mm (n = 92). General color yellowish brown (Fig. 13 A – C View Figure 13 ); elytra, meso- and metathoracic and abdominal ventrites metallic purple; legs black. four basal antennomeres I – IV yellowish brown, V dark brown, VI – XI black. Antennae (Fig. 14 A View Figure 14 ) filiform in males, ratios of lengths of antennomeres I to XI 1.0: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.6: 0.5: 0.6: 0.6: 0.6: 0.6: 0.9; ratios of length to width from antennomeres I to XI 2.9: 2.1: 2.5: 2.1: 2.2: 2.1: 2.0: 1.9: 1.8: 1.9: 3.1; similar in females, ratios of lengths of antennomeres I to XI (Fig. 14 B View Figure 14 ) 1.0: 0.4: 0.4: 0.4: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.6: 0.6: 0.8; ratios of length to width from antennomeres I to XI 3.3: 2.2: 2.8: 2.4: 2.7: 2.1: 2.2: 1.9: 2.1: 1.9: 2.8. Pronotum 1.8–1.9 × wider than long; disc shining, with sparse, fine punctures, less convex; longitudinal groove on each side of apical margin shallow, with several coarse punctures along longitudinal groove; short and shallow longitudinal groove on basal margin; lateral margins rounded; apical margins slightly concave; basal margin medially convex. Elytra 1.2 × longer than wide; disc with coarse punctures arranged into longitudinal lines, with fine punctures between coarse punctures; lateral margins rounded, narrowed behind middle. Aedeagus (Fig. 14 C, D View Figure 14 ) wide, ~ 4.2 × longer than wide; parallel sided, subapically narrow, apex with one median rounded process; slightly curved in lateral view, apex directed inward; tectum membranous, internal sac without stout setae. Endophallic spiculae reduced. Gonocoxae (Fig. 14 G View Figure 14 ) longer than wide, and basally connected; each gonocoxa subapically narrowed and apex truncate, and curved outwards, with eight or nine long setae along apical and outer margins. Ventrite VIII (Fig. 14 E View Figure 14 ) with apex weakly sclerotized, with one semicircular membranous area at middle of apical margin and several long setae in a transverse line near apical margin, with several setae along apical margin, both types of setae absent medially, spiculum extremely long. Spermathecal receptaculum (Fig. 14 F View Figure 14 ) strongly swollen; pump long and curved, with small apical process; spermathecal duct sclerotized, short after base of spermathecal gland.
Variation.
Adults from Taiwan have yellowish brown legs (Fig. 13 D – F View Figure 13 ) that are different from those of the Asian continent, which possess black legs.
Diagnosis.
Most adults of N. nigripes Jacoby are similar to those of N. chrysomeloides but differ in possessing black legs (yellowish brown legs in others). However, Taiwanese populations of N. nigripes is not distinguishable from those of N. chrysomeloides , which is not recorded from Taiwan. In males of N. nigripes , the widely rounded apex of the aedeagus bearing a small process at the middle (Fig. 14 C View Figure 14 ) differs from the truncate apex and small process in N. gemella (Fig. 7 C View Figure 7 ) and N. dohertyi (Fig. 5 C View Figure 5 ), and acute apex in N. chrysomeloides (Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 ). The slightly curved aedeagus in lateral view (Fig. 14 D View Figure 14 ) differs from the moderately curved aedeagus in N. gemella (Fig. 7 D View Figure 7 ) and N. chrysomeloides (Fig. 4 E View Figure 4 ), and strongly curved aedeagus in N. dohertyi (Fig. 5 E View Figure 5 ). The membranous tectum (Fig. 14 C View Figure 14 ) differs from the sclerotized tectum in N. chrysomeloides (Fig. 4 C View Figure 4 ). In females of N. nigripes , laterally directed apices of and gonocoxae (Fig. 14 G View Figure 14 ) are different from the straight gonocoxae in N. gemella (Fig. 7 G View Figure 7 ), dorsally directed apices in N. chrysomeloides (Fig. 4 H View Figure 4 ), and inwardly directed apices in N. dohertyi (Fig. 5 I View Figure 5 ). The setae of abdominal ventrite VIII, with one transverse line of long setae inside the apical margin and dense short setae along the apical margin (Fig. 14 E View Figure 14 ) differs from the presence of several pairs of long setae along the apical margin in N. dohertyi (Fig. 5 F, G View Figure 5 ).
Host plant.
Adults in Taiwan feed on leaves of Hibiscus taiwanensis , which is an endemic plant.
Distribution.
China, Laos, Myanmar, Taiwan, and Thailand.
Zhang and Yang (2007) provided a key to Chinese species of Nisotra . We think most of the key is appropriate, but lengths of bodies and some coloration characters are too variable for reliable diagnoses. It is modified to include species from Taiwan as follows:
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Nisotra nigripes Jacoby
Lee, Chi-Feng, Chiang, Ming-Yao, Geiser, Michael F. & Chuang, Kuo-Hung 2024 |
Nisotra orbiculata sensu
Kimoto S 1989: 263 |
Kimoto S 1970: 215 |
Nisotra nigripes Jacoby, 1894: 293 ( Myanmar ); Medvedev 2000: 21 ( Nepal ); Zhang and Yang 2007: 844 ( China : Yunnan).
Zhang Y & Yang X 2007: 844 |
Medvedev LN 2000: 21 |
Jacoby M 1894: 293 |