Nola puera Hu, Wang & Han
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3920.3.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:673DC604-1409-4014-B161-4732F7AE8936 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6121769 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C74187C0-216B-7103-A0B1-FA5CFC5A5D02 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nola puera Hu, Wang & Han |
status |
sp. nov. |
Nola puera Hu, Wang & Han sp. nov.
( Figs 6–10 View FIGURES 1 – 10. 1 – 5 )
Materials examined. Holotype. Male, Simao, Puer, Yunnan, 15–19.VII.2009, Huilin Han & Mujie Qi ( NEFU). Paratypes. 2 males, the same data as the holotype ( NEFU); 1 female, Puer, Yunnan, 14.VI.2007, Huilin Han ( NEFU).
Diagnosis. Nola puera is extremely similar to N. erythrostigmata Hampson, 1894 on external feature, but there are some slight differences: N. puera has the somewhat wider forewing, the broader antemedial line, a right-angle bending in middle of postmedial line and at posterior of subterminal line, while N. erythrostigmata has a black and big dot at front of antemedial line, a obtuse angle at counterpart of postmedial and subterminal lines. In male genitalia, the main differences are as follows: N. puera has a relatively short and broad valva, a small, triangular and apically pointed harpe and the vesica without cornuti ( Figs 7 & 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10. 1 – 5 ), while N. erythrostigmata has a narrower and longer valva, a long and apically round harpe and the vesica with a long cornutus. In female genitalia, N. puera has a narrower and shorter ductus bursae with anterior part broaden, while N. erythrostigmata has a longer and broader ductus bursae with posterior part broaden.
Description. Adult ( Figs 6 & 9 View FIGURES 1 – 10. 1 – 5 ). Wingspan 12–15 mm. Head and thorax white; antenna brown, bipectinate in male; labial palpi grayish white. Collar grayish white with brown dots. Abdomen grayish yellow in male and grayish white in female. Forewing ground color white; basal line undistinguished, but with a brown patch at wing base; antemedial line blackish brown, wide, arc-shaped; medial line being absent; postmedial line brown, double lines, inner line faint, excurved to R5, straight to Cu1, then right-angle bending to inner margin, with a brown patch at front; subterminal line brown and waved; terminal line brown with brown dots at inside; cilia gray with brown. Hind wing ground color gray; veins highlighted; discal spot pale brown. Male genitalia ( Figs 7 & 8 View FIGURES 1 – 10. 1 – 5 ): Uncus degenerated; tegumen slightly broad; dorsal valva broader and longer than ventral valva, slightly sclerotized at costal margin; ventral valva narrow and short with a small spine at top, sclerotized at ventral margin; harpe small triangle, pointed apically; juxta tongue-shaped; saccus small and funnelshaped. Aedeagus very short; vesica without cornuti. Female genitalia ( Fig 10 View FIGURES 1 – 10. 1 – 5 ): Papillae anales medium-long; apophyses posteriores and apophyses anteriores well developed; ostium fillister-shaped; ductus bursae thin, wide at anterior part, membranous, as long as corpus bursae; corpus bursae large, elliptical-ovoid, membranous, without signa.
Distribution. China (Yunnan).
Etymology. The specific name is derived from the locality of holotype, Puer.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |