Epicoccum anhuiense Y. Wang, Y. Tu, X. Chen, H. Jiang, H. Ren, Q. Lu, C. Wei & W. Lv, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/mycokeys.105.119536 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11390994 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C70B60BD-2EE5-5D39-BC39-EAD224287330 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Epicoccum anhuiense Y. Wang, Y. Tu, X. Chen, H. Jiang, H. Ren, Q. Lu, C. Wei & W. Lv |
status |
sp. nov. |
Epicoccum anhuiense Y. Wang, Y. Tu, X. Chen, H. Jiang, H. Ren, Q. Lu, C. Wei & W. Lv sp. nov.
Fig. 6 View Figure 6
Etymology.
Named after the location where it was collected, Anhui Province.
Description.
Sexual morph: undetermined. Asexual morph: Pycnidia smooth, subglobose to ellipsoidal, pale brown, attached to mycelium. Conidia ellipsoidal to subcylindrical, pale yellow to green, smooth- and thin-walled, abundant, generated from pycnidia, composed of a single cell, 10.5–16 × 4.5–8 µm (av. = 13.4 ± 1.4 × 6.3 ± 0.7 µm, n = 30). Mycelia lateral branching, septate, hyaline.
Culture characteristics.
Colonies on PDA reaching 75–79 mm diam. after 7 days at 28 ° C in the dark, margin regular, covered by floccose aerial mycelium, greyish; reverse pale brown to pale buff, white edges. Pycnidia and conidia produced on the colony surface after being cultured for 14 days at 28 ° C in the dark. Colonies on OA reaching 81–85 mm diam. after 7 days at 28 ° C in the dark, margin irregular, aerial mycelium flat, whitish; reverse concolorous.
Materials examined.
China, Anhui Province, Anqing City, from diseased leaves of C. sinensis cv. Longjingchangye, 16 Nov 2019, Y. C. Wang, Holotype HMAS 352388 , culture ex-type CGMCC 3.24242 = YCW 961 . Yunnan Province, Puer City, Jingdong Yizu Autonomous County, from health leaves of C. sinensis , 13 Jun 2020, Y. C. Wang, culture ex-type CGMCC 3.24246 = YCW 1829 .
Notes.
Epicoccum anhuiense is closely related to E. latusicollum with high statistical support (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ). Epicoccum anhuiense has 5 bp differences in the TUB 2 sequence from E. latusicollum . In addition, E. anhuiense can be distinguished from E. latusicollum by the morphological features of its conidia and the conidia size of E. anhuiense (10.5–16 × 4.5–8 µm) is larger than that of D. prosopidis (4–6.5 × 2–3 µm). In the present study, eight strains were isolated from healthy or diseased tea plant leaves.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |