Arhaphe cicindeloides Walker, 1873
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.201512 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6187821 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C6651248-FF83-0074-FF2D-FF2A3B8BFDC2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arhaphe cicindeloides Walker, 1873 |
status |
|
Arhaphe cicindeloides Walker, 1873 View in CoL
( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7 , 15–17)
Arhaphe cicindeloides Walker, 1873: 36 View in CoL (description). Syntypes: 3 spec., Mexico, Oajaca [= Oaxaca] (from Salle‘s collection), 1 spec., Mexico (from Glennie‘s collection) (BMNH).
Arhaphe cicindeloides: Distant (1883): 227 View in CoL , pl. XXI: Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 2 . (habitus illustration, catalog, faunistics).
Arhaphe cicindeloides: Uhler (1886): 16 View in CoL (checklist, synonym of A. carolina View in CoL ).
Arhaphe cicindeloides: Lethierry & Severin (1894): 240 View in CoL (catalog, distribution).
Arhaphe cicindeloides: Distant (1902): 44 View in CoL (comments on Walker‘s species).
Arhaphe cicindeloides View in CoL : Van Duzee (1916): 24 (checklist).
Arhaphe cicindeloides View in CoL (partim): Van Duzee (1917): 205 (catalog, distribution).
Arhaphe cicindeloides View in CoL (partim): Hussey (1929): 27 –28 (catalog, distribution).
Arhaphe cicindeloides: Bliven (1973): 126 View in CoL –127 (proposed synonymy with A. carolina View in CoL ).
Arhaphe cicindeloides View in CoL (partim): Henry (1988): 160 (catalog, distribution).
Arhaphe divisa Brailovsky, 1981: 85 View in CoL , 98–101 (description, habitus photo, faunistics). Holotype: 3, Mexico, Durango, Los Becerros, 2,560 m a.s.l., 22.vi.1940, C. Bolívar lgt. (UNAM). New synonym.
Type material examined. Lectotype (here designated): Ƥ, “58 135 Mex. (Oaxaca)” [p] // “B.C.A. Hem. 1 Arhaphe cicindeloides ” [p] // “ Lectotypus ” [p, red label] ( BMNH).
Paralectotypes: 3, “ Mexico. Sallé Coll.” [p] // “Distant Coll. 1911-383” [p] ( BMNH); 3, “ Type ” [p, white round label with green margin] // “58 / 86” [hw, round light-blue label] // “2. Arhaphe cicindeloides ” [p, long white label] ( BMNH).
Additional material examined. MEXICO: Durango: El Salto, 3.viii.1951, 6 3 5 ƤƤ, H. E. Evans lgt. ( CUIC, MMBC, NMPC). Estado de México: Toluca, 31.vii.?4, 1 Ƥ, Univ. Kan. Mex. Exp. ( MMBC). Oaxaca: Oaxaca, 2 ƤƤ ( NHMW).
Redescription. Coloration. Body, wide median transversal stripe across corium, narrow stripe on inner margin of corium, and membrane black; remaining parts of corium, posterior pleural flange III and epicoxal lobe III pale yellowish.
Structure. Head small ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3 – 7 ), smooth, prominently rounded basally; frons lightly, clypeus strongly elevated. Both membranes overlapping, markedly surpassing apex of corium, reaching base of mesotergite VI in male and sometimes nearly midlength of mesotergite VI in female.
Puncturation. Head glabrous. Pronotal lobe, scutellum, clavus, and median transverse stripe on corium punctured although the punctures are not very prominent (quite visible after moistening the specimen).
Pilosity. Head with fine silver adpressed pubescence except center of frons and vertex posteriad to posterior margins of eyes, this forming a very conspicuous black matt quadrangular spot contrasting with the surrounding silvery head dorsum ( Figs. 15, 17 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). A silvery adpressed pubescens also covering entire callar lobe, slightly surpassing on anterior margin of pronotal lobe ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 14 ), dorsal laterotergite V, tergite VI, and most of body venter except of join of mesosternum and metasternum, ventrite II, adjacent bare spots on ventral laterotergites III and IV (surpassing on zygosternites), bare anterolateral spots on ventral laterotergites V and VI, and entire ventrite VII ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). Entire dorsum of head (including the black spot), pronotum, scutellum, clavus, corium, and visible abdominal tergites covered with long erect black hairs, somewhat shorter on corium and tergites ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). Ventral parts of head with shorter silver hairs, abdominal venter with shorter silver erect hairs and intermingled longer black erect hairs, ventrite VII only with black erect hairs. Femora and tibiae covered with both short silvery pubescence and long erect black (sometimes silver) hairs.
Measurements (mm). Male (n = 1). Body length 6.70; head: length 1.13, width (including eyes) 1.70, interocular width 1.08; length of antennomeres: 1–1.08, 2–0.97, 3–0.65, 4–1.24; pronotum: length 1.51, width 1.78; scutellum: length 0.86, width 0.92; corium: length 2.32, width 0.97.
Female (n = 1). Body length 6.70; head: length 1.40, width (including eyes) 1.78, interocular width 1.19; length of antennomeres: 1–1.13, 2–1.13, 3–0.76, 4–1.27; pronotum: length 1.62, width 2.00; scutellum: length 0.92, width 0.97; corium: length 2.86, width 1.19.
Differential diagnosis. This species is easy to distinguish from all remaining described species of Arhaphe by the exceptional pattern of pubescence on the head dorsum, which is covered by silvery adpressed hairs except for a black matt quadrangular spot in the middle of the frons, and vertex behind the posterior margins of the eyes ( Figs. 15, 17 View FIGURES 16 – 21 ). Arhaphe arguta differs from A. cicindeloides by its larger size; remarkably larger head without silvery adpressed pubescence, which is covered only with long black erect hairs; and the wing membrane limited to a crescent along the inner margin of corium, not surpassing corial apex ( Figs. 8–9).
Taxonomy. Uhler (1886: 16) first synonymised this species with A. carolina , but all subsequent authors, except Bliven (1973), recognised it as distinct. Barber (1911) used the name for a species collected in Arizona, which was referred to as A. cicindeloides by all subsequent authors except of Bliven (1956, 1973). Bliven (1973) synonymised A. cicindeloides with A. carolina with the following comment: “Distant‘s figure of cicindeloides B.C.A. Tab. XXI, fig. 2) is carolina . The latter has a definite recognition feature in the white membrane with the black tip. In 1911 (p. 28) Barber arbitrarily and without presenting one shred of evidence, attached the name cicindeloides to a species found in Arizona, undoubtedly to prevent his newly-described mimetica from being obliterated by the inept and unscrupulous insect-namers who were as prevalent then as they are now.“ Bliven (1973) also proposed A. snowi as a new name for A. cicindeloides sensu Barber (1911) . Henry (1988) wrote: “Because no one has restudied Walker‘s type (s) (and in my opinion, Distant‘s (1893, Biol. Centr.-Am., Rhyn., 1: plate 21, fig. 2) figure of cicindeloides agrees with current concepts of the species), it seems best to continue recognizing A. cicindeloides and consider Bliven‘s snowi a synonym.“
However, the present revision of the type material revealed that A. cicindeloides sensu Barber (1911) and other authors is not conspecific with the types of A. cicindeloides Distant. Arhaphe arguta ( Bliven, 1956) is the oldest available name for A. cicindeloides sensu Barber (not Distant), with A. snowi being its junior synonym. For this reason, all the previous records of A. cicindeloides from the United States as well some of the Mexican records ( Brailovsky 1981) must refer to A. arguta . On the other hand, A. divisa Brailovsky, 1981 fits the original description of A. cicindeloides , and must be considered its junior synonym.
Biology and ecology. Unknown. The remarks on biology and ecology of the species by Barber (1910) and Torre-Bueno (1942), as well as the description of 5th instar by Bergroth (1921) belong to A. arguta .
Distribution. MEXICO: Distrito Federal ( Distant 1883), Durango ( Brailovsky 1981, as A. divisa ; this paper), Estado de México (this paper), Guanajuato ( Brailovsky 1981, as A. divisa ), Michoacán ( Brailovsky 1981, as A. divisa ), Oaxaca ( Walker 1873, Distant 1883; this paper), Zacatecas ( Brailovsky 1981, as A. divisa ).
Torre-Bueno (1913: 59) listed both A. carolina and A. cicindeloides from Southern Pines in North Carolina ; the identity of his A. cicindeloides cannot be established.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Arhaphe cicindeloides Walker, 1873
Stehlík, Jaroslav L. & Kment, Petr 2011 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides
Henry 1988: 160 |
Arhaphe divisa
Brailovsky 1981: 85 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides:
Bliven 1973: 126 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides
Hussey 1929: 27 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides:
Distant 1902: 44 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides:
Lethierry 1894: 240 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides:
Uhler 1886: 16 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides:
Distant 1883: 227 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides
Walker 1873: 36 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides
Van Duzee (1916) : 24 |
Arhaphe cicindeloides
Van Duzee (1917) : 205 |