Dioscorea cubensis R. Knuth (1917:209)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.258.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13670464 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C539884B-FF8B-9138-FF70-FDA40D02FC2E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dioscorea cubensis R. Knuth (1917:209) |
status |
|
1. Dioscorea cubensis R. Knuth (1917:209) View in CoL . Type— CUBA. Without locality, 1860–1864, Wright 3252 pro parte [holotype B! (♂), isotypes BM! (♂ element only), MO! (♂ element only)]
D. cuspidata View in CoL auct. non Willdenow in Grisebach (1866: 251).
Notes: Eastern Cuban endemic. The type collection is cited as “ pro parte ” in the protologue; the holotype consists of a single staminate element, and Knuth did not describe the pistillate flowers or inflorences for this species. The BM and MO sheets each include a detached infructescence of D. tamoidea Griseb. Knuth (1924) View in CoL cited “Wright 3252 p.p.” among the exsiccatae of D. tamoidea View in CoL , citing both staminate and pistillate material, however I have not seen any staminate material of this collection number that corresponds to D. tamoidea View in CoL . Grisebach’s (1866) D. cuspidata View in CoL is based on Wright 3252.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dioscorea cubensis R. Knuth (1917:209)
Raz, Lauren 2016 |
D. cuspidata
Grisebach, A. H. R. 1866: 251 |