Brachyphoderes longicollis ( Chemsak and Noguera, 1993 ) Clarke, 2015

Clarke, Robin O. S., 2015, Revision of the genus Acyphoderes Audinet-Serville, 1833, with a brief synopsis of the genus Bromiades Thomson, 1864 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2015 (401), pp. 1-92 : 56-57

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4531694
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1E971D20-D232-4729-9249-BE529F677862
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10526149
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C50087CF-FFB5-665E-BBDF-F90A0966FD5F
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Brachyphoderes longicollis ( Chemsak and Noguera, 1993 )
status	comb. nov.

Treatment

Brachyphoderes longicollis ( Chemsak and Noguera, 1993) View in CoL comb. nov.

( Fig. 28 View Figure 25–30 )

Acyphoderes longicollis Chemsak and Noguera, 1993: 80 View in CoL ; Monné 2005: 456 (cat.). Note. In Monné (2005) the citation for this species is recorded as Chemsak and Noguera, 1995: 80; it should be 1993: 80.

Species Concept. Based on the original description and illustration, and examination of eight paratypes in the EMEC collection.

Measurements (mm). 8 males, total length, 12.0-15.6; length of prothorax, 2.10-2.60; width of prothorax, 1.65-2.15; length of elytra, 3.25-3.95; width at humeri, 1.70-2.20.

Material analyzed. Paratype, MEXICO, Jalisco, Est. Bio. Chamela, on Paullinia flowers, 1 male, 14.VII.1990 ( EMEC 202,808).

Material examined. Paratypes, MEXICO, Jalisco, Est. Bio. Chamela, on Paullinia flowers, 6 males, 3- 17.VII.1990 ( EMEC 202,807 View Materials /809-813) ; Est. Bio. Chamela, 1 male, 4.VII.1991, J. D. Mc Carty col. ( EMEC 202,806 View Materials ) ; La Manzanilla , 1 male, 3.VII.1991, F. A. Noguera col. ( EMEC 202,807 View Materials ) .

Comment. Very similar to, but geographically distant from B. dehiscens . Tegmen of aedeagus very similar, lateral lobes of tegmen slightly longer and narrower, and more setose in B. dehiscens than in this species. However, specimens of B. dehiscens are few in number, and the data presented in the key for the identification of the two species requires the examination of more specimens to eliminate differences due to variation.