Rhopaea laticollis Blackburn, 1911
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4885.4.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E69687C-74B4-4087-9BF6-039F5FE14A9E |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4340952 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C264702F-4527-3503-2BE7-9D12FBC0F9F6 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Rhopaea laticollis Blackburn, 1911 |
| status |
|
Rhopaea laticollis Blackburn, 1911
Rhopaea laticollis Blackburn, 1911: 192 .
Rhodaea laticollis: Lea 1912 : xxxvi (in error).
Lectotype (here designated) male: Type H. T. (circular red ringed, typeset) | 2095 Inverell [29.78°S, 151.12°E] (handwritten in red) T (handwritten) | Blackburn coll. 1910-236 (typeset) | RHOPAEA laticollis, Blackb. (handwritten) | aedeagus dissected out and mounted on card | my lectotype label; in NHML. GoogleMaps
Blackburn (1911) did not define the type series, seeing an unknown number of males (vide Articles 73.1.2, 72.1.1) from Inverell. Lea (1912) noted that the ‘type’ had been sent to NHML, and Britton (1978) referred to a “ holotype ” male from Inverell in NHML. Houston & Weir (1992) listed a “ holotype (probable)” from the same locality. As Britton (1978) provided no discussion and did not label any specimen in NHML, and that Houston & Weir (1992) were unsure of the status of the type, neither mention of a holotype constitutes a valid lectotype designation (Article 74.5). To stabilise nomenclature, I designate the male in NHML the lectotype.
| T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
| NHML |
Natural History Museum, Tripoli |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Rhopaea laticollis Blackburn, 1911
| Allsopp, Peter G. 2020 |
Rhopaea laticollis
| Blackburn, T. 1911: 192 |