Arrhopalites glabrofasciatus, Zeppelini & Brito & Lima, 2018
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4500.1.3 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3C0A694-059F-4175-A7B4-646F18C09467 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300197 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FFFE8244-074F-47E9-ACCC-F088C4BD0A2D |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:FFFE8244-074F-47E9-ACCC-F088C4BD0A2D |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Arrhopalites glabrofasciatus |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Arrhopalites glabrofasciatus View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 1–16 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURES 2–4 View FIGURES 5–7 View FIGURES 8–10 View FIGURES 11–12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 , Table 1
Type material. Holotype adult female on slide, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Brumadinho (43°57’51”W; 20°09’03”S), PBR 41, Iron Cave , 08.II.2017, leg. Carste Team. GoogleMaps Holotype deposited at CRFS-UEPB # 10375 .
Paratype adult, female, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Brumadinho (43°57’51”W; 20°09’03”S), PBR 41, Iron cave , 08.II.2017, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10379 GoogleMaps .
Paratype adult female, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Brumadinho (43°57’51”W; 20°09’03”S), PBR 41, Iron cave , 08.II.2017, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10380 GoogleMaps .
Paratype adult female, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Brumadinho (43°57’51”W; 20°09’03”S), PBR 41, Iron cave , 08.II.2017, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10381 GoogleMaps .
Paratype adult female, Brazil, Minas Gerais, Brumadinho (43°57’51”W; 20°09’03”S), PBR 41, Iron cave , 08.II.2017, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10383 GoogleMaps .
Additional material (deposited in CRFS-UEPB):
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Matozinhos (44°05’55”W; 19°32’12”S), BM 157 GoogleMaps , limestone cave, 07-20.XII.2016, leg. Spelayon team. CRFS-UEPB # 10376 .
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Matozinhos (44°05’38”W; 19°31’44”S), BM 105 GoogleMaps , limestone cave, 07-20.XII.2016, leg. Spelayon team. CRFS-UEPB # 10377 .
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Rio Acima, Serra do Gandarela (43°39’52”W; 20°02’51”), GAND 122 , limestone cave, 14.VII–18.IX.2016, leg. Carste team. CRFS-UEPB # 10378 .
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Rio Acima, Serra do Gandarela (43°39’40”W; 20°04’37”), GAND 027 , limestone cave, 14.VII–18.IX.2016, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10382 .
Brazil, Minas Gerais, Rio Acima, Serra do Gandarela (43°40’09”W; 20°03’59”), GAND 110 , limestone cave, 14.VII–18.IX.2016, leg. Carste team, CRFS-UEPB # 10384 .
Description. Habitus sminthuroid ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Holotype female total length (head+body) 1116.95µm, cephalic diagonal 345.22 µm, other measures as in Table 1. Color. Body pale yellow or white.
Ant I with 5 normal chaetae on anterior side, with one small microchaeta in apical part on posterior side. Ant II with 7 apical chaetae, 3 medial and 4 basal, one basal internal much longer (~3×) than other three ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 2–4 ). Ant III apical organ with 2 sensilla inserted in a single pit, Ape and Ai short and bristlelike, Aai minute, rodlike and blunt, other chaetae normal. Ant III mid-dorsal part with 4 chaetae longer (~2×) than other in the segment ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 2–4 ). Ant IV 6 (exceptionally 5) subdivided, the subsegmentation is annulated and forms a ring between subsegments, the basal one with 4 whorl of chaetae and an apical sensillum (5,9,8,8–1 respectively from the base), the three intermediary subsegments bearing 8–2,7–3,8–4 and the apical subsegment with 35–6, subapical organite at the base of a strongly curved chaeta ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 2–4 ).
Eyes absent. Posterior cephalic chaetae slightly spinelike ( Figs 5–7 View FIGURES 5–7 ), posterior dorsal chaetotaxy A,B,C,D as 5,3,5,4, interantennal region with 4α and 3β chaetae ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–7 ), cuticle shows two smooth areas in from of the antennae ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–7 ); frontal head chaetotaxy a,b,c,d,e,f with 8,9,13,14,13,14 chaetae ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–7 ). Labral chaetotaxy according to formula a,m,p,pl with 4,5,5,6 chaetae respectively ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–7 ).
Leg I ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ): precoxae and coxa with 1 chaeta each; trochanter with 4 chaetae; femur with 11 chaetae; tibiotarsus with 43 chaetae, Ja slightly curved, whorls I–V with 8 chaetae, and region F with 3 primary FP chaetae (e, ae, pe), secondary chaetae FSa absent; unguis with a weak tunica and 1 inner tooth; unguiculus subapical filament exceeding the tip of the unguis, with a clear corner tooth.
Leg II ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8–10 ): epicoxae and precoxae with 1 chaeta each, coxa with 2 primary chaetae, 1 microsensillum and 1 secondary chaetae i2; trochanter with 5 chaetae, being 3 anterior, a trochanteral organ (a1) and 1 posterior; femur with 10 chaetae and 1 basal curved bristlelike chaeta; tibiotarsus with 43 chaetae: whorl I with 9 chaetae, Ja strait, whorls II–IV with 8 chaetae each, whorl V with 7 chaetae, and region F with 3 primary FP chaetae (e, ae, pe), secondary chaeta FSa absent; unguis with tunica and 1 small inner tooth; unguiculus subapical filament exceeding the tip of the unguis, a small corner tooth present.
Leg III ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 ): epicoxae and precoxae with 1 distal chaeta each, coxa chaetotaxy as in leg II; trochanter with 3 anterior chaetae, a metatrochanteral organ, and 1 posterior chaeta; femur with 12 chaetae and 2 short chaetae (p2 and pi4) on posterior face; tibiotarsus with 43 chaetae: whorl I with 9 chaetae, Ja normal, whorls II–IV with 8 chaetae, whorls V with 7 chaetae, and region F with 3 primary FP chaetae (e, ae, pe), secondary chaetae FSa present; unguis with a clear tunica and 1 small inner tooth; unguiculus subapical filament short or absent, never reaching the tip of the unguis, corner tooth present.
Ventral tube with 1+1 apical anterior chaetae. Ramus of tenaculum tridentate, with basal finger like appendix, corpus with 2 apical chaetae.
Furca: Manubrium with 4+4 distal chaetae, p2–p3 absence; dens anterior chaetotaxy Ia–Iia–IIIa–Iva–Ba as 3– 2–2–1–1, Ia slightly spinelike; posterior chaetotaxy Ie, I–IIIpe, Ip slightly spinelike, Ii and III-IVpi strongly spinelike ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11–12 ). Mucro gutterlike, both lamellae serrated, constricted at the distal third, with spoon shaped tip ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 11–12 and 13 View FIGURE 13 ).
Great abdomen. All chaetae smooth and acuminated; thorax and Abd I chaetae short, dorsal posterior abdominal chaetae long and slender; chaetotaxy as in Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ; trichobothria A/B/C equidistant, forming an obtuse angle of 163° opening forward ( Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 and 15 View FIGURE 15 ).
Small abdomen of female: one small axial and 2+2 strong lateral cuticular spines on the upper valve, the lower valves present 2+2 strong spines and a very small spine at the base of the inner one, which may be missing in some specimens ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ) trichobothrium D present, chaetae mps1–3 and mpi1–2 and mpi4 broad and winged; subanal appendage flattened, gutterlike and apically serrated.
Etymology. The name of the new species refers to the smooth areas in front of the antennae (from Latin glabrus = smooth; fascia = bands, stripes).
Distribution and habitat. Good’s Biogeographic zone 27 ( Good 1974; Culik & Zeppelini 2003). The climate according to Köppen’s system is ‘as’ ( Köppen 1936; Shear 1966), presenting dry winters and wet summers, average temperatures of 18 °C during winter and 22 °C in summer. Populations of new species were found in several caves both in iron and limestone rock, where they were found on deposits of organic debris. Some of the caves, mainly those on iron rock matrix are rather too small to present a clear zonation from the entrance to the bottom of the caves, the inside temperatures and humidity vary mostly with the external conditions, even though the humidity is always higher inside the caves. The surrounding vegetation is dominated by semi-deciduous forest and dry woods. Some of the caves are next to the mining degraded areas and suffers intense direct and indirect environmental pressures from this activity.
Remarks. The new species can be diagnosed by a combination of characters, but the most striking feature is the angle of the trichobothrial complex, A. glabrofasciatus sp. nov. presents trichobothria ABC equidistant forming an angle of 163° opening forward. This thrichobothrial pattern is observed in Pygmarrhopalites Vargovitsh, 2009 (discussed below) and Troglopalites Vargovitsh, 2012 .
The new species is the only known Brazilian species which lacks eyes, it can be differentiated from A. amorimi Palacios-Vargas & Zeppelini, 1996 and A. heteroculatus Zeppelini, 2006 , both with 2+2 eyes and long apical filament of unguiculus III, A. amorimi has the Ant IV divided into four ringed subsegments, and A. heteroculatus lacks tunica in the first unguis. Other Brazilian species present 1+1 eyes, A. gnaspinii Palacios-Vargas & Zeppelini, 1996 and A. lawrencei Palacios-Vargas & Zeppelini, 1996 have the Ant IV divided into six ringed subsegments, lack tunica ( A. lawrencei lacks tunica in all unguis) and inner tooth in the first unguis, A. gnaspinii presents the Aai of the AIIIO blunt and larger than the organ sensilla, similar to Ape in length. Arrhopalites lawrencei presents a long apical filament in the unguiculus III, exceeding the tip of unguis, as well as A. alambariensis , which has an undivided Ant. IV, and A. botuveraensis Zeppelini, 2006 , which presents Ant. IV with five ringed subsegments and lacks tunica on unguis I.
According to Vargovitsh (2009), species of the genus Arrhopalites present the trichobothria ABC forming an angle close to 90° with B closer to C than to A, AB and BC equidistant, p chaetae of Abd I located above of the trichobothrium B and chaetae c1 above of the trichobothrium C. While those of the genus Pygmarrhopalites Vargovitsh, 2009 present an obtuse angle, close to 180° with AB<BC or AB and BC equidistant, p chaetae of Abd I located below of the trichobothrium B and chaetae c1 lies at or below of the trichobothrium C (this last characteristic is also observed in A. macronyx Vargovitsh, 2012 ). This finding suggests that Pygmarrhopalites may be paraphyletic in relation to Arrhopalites . The genus Pygmarrhopalites is mainly based on the thrichobothrial pattern and the presence of FS chaeta on all Tita, both characters supposed to be plesiomorphic ( Zeppelini 2011). The trichobothrial pattern (angle and relative ABC distance) is highly variable even among subgroups of Pygmarrhopalites ( Vargovitsh 2009) , a putative apormorphy for Pygmarrhopalites would be the reduction of the anterior chaetae on dens (usually 3,2,1,1) which is plesiomorphic in Arrhopalites (usually with five rows of anterior chaetae), even though this character is subject to homoplasy (e.g. A. nivalis Yosii, 1966 with 3,2,1,1). The genus Arrhopalites , at the other hand, must be monophyletic, supported by a number of synapomorphies (e.g. cuticular spines on the anal valve, absence of FSa on tita I and II). A more accurate definition on the phylogenetic relationships in Arrhopalitidae demands a detailed revision of the whole chaetotaxy of species of each subgroup.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.