Protosuberites Swartschewsky, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4576.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CB2EFF9C-E670-44F2-AA7A-8415FC896C45 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3716740 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BA0487F8-7E04-4141-FF7F-FCE1FEEF7BDE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2020-03-19 07:35:59, last updated 2024-11-27 22:34:01) |
scientific name |
Protosuberites Swartschewsky, 1905 |
status |
|
Genus Protosuberites Swartschewsky, 1905 View in CoL
Protosuberites Swartschewsky, 1905: 36 View in CoL .
Laxosuberites sensu Topsent, 1938: 20 .
Type species. Protosuberites prototipus Swartschewsky, 1905: 36 , pl. VI fig. 5 .
Diagnosis. Thinly to more massively encrusting sponges with a velvety or microhispid surface. Oscular veins often prominently visible. The surface skeleton consists of brushes of tylostyles, which are often somewhat smaller than those of the choanosome. Choanosomal skeleton consists variably of single spicules erect on the substrate, or bundles running from the substrate to the surface, usually parallel to each other without any form of anastomosing ( Van Soest 2002).
Remarks. Protosuberites was revived by Van Soest (2002) to take the place of Laxosuberites sensu Topsent (1938) which was extended to include thinly encrusting sponges with bundles of spicules in the choanosome and ectosomal brushes (see Van Soest [2002: 235] for an in-depth discussion). In thickly encrusting sponges with digitate processes, the choanosomal tracts are often orientated along the axis of the process, giving the impression of compression of the axis, and the divergence and termination of these tracts under the ectosome often give the impression of an ‘extra-axial’ system, as in Plicatellopsis Burton, 1932 . However, the skeleton is not the same as in species of Plicatellopsis which have strictly compressed axes of anastomosing tracts in a stalk, from which extends a clear extra-axial skeleton in branches or fans.
Burton, M. (1932) Sponges. Discovery Reports, 6, 237 - 392.
Swartschewsky, B. (1905) Materialui faunui ghubok Chernaghomorya (Monaxonida). (Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Schwamm- Fauna des Schwarzen Meeres). Zapiski Kievskago obshchestva estestvoispytatelei (Memoires de la Societe des Naturalistes de Kiew), 20 (1), 1 - 48. [in Russian; German summary 49 - 59]
Topsent, E. (1938) Contribution nouvelle a la connaissance des Eponges des cotes d'Algerie. Les especes nouvelles d'O. Schmidt, 1868. Bulletin de l'Institut oceanographique, Monaco, 758, 1 - 32.
Van Soest, R. W. M. (2002) Family Suberitidae. In: Hooper, J. N. A & Van Soest, R. W. M. (Eds.), Systema Porifera, a guide to the classification of the sponges. Fol. 1. Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, New York, 1708 pp.
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Protosuberites Swartschewsky, 1905
Kelly, Michelle & Rowden, Ashley A. 2019 |
Laxosuberites sensu Topsent, 1938 : 20
Topsent, E. 1938: 20 |
Protosuberites
Swartschewsky, B. 1905: 36 |