Diaphanopterodea Handlirsch, 1906

Yang, Nan, Cui, Yingying, Xu, Ziqiang, Xu, Yanqi, Ren, Dong & Béthoux, Olivier, 2024, The first Permian Diaphanopterodea (Insecta, Megasecopteromorpha) from China, Fossil Record 27 (2), pp. 247-258 : 247-258

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/fr.27.e128892

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E93DEB3D-DFFF-4BE5-8B06-E79DB3F271F7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13327729

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B65A0FCE-273A-557A-A82F-39946C68C2DA

treatment provided by

by Pensoft

scientific name

Diaphanopterodea Handlirsch, 1906
status

 

Order Diaphanopterodea Handlirsch, 1906 View in CoL

Remarks.

Commonly among Megasecopteromorpha, and more particularly in Diaphanopterodea, MA shows some degree of connection with RP. It ranges from a connection via a strong cross-vein, shortly after the origin of MA, to a full fusion with R, then continuing along RP, from which MA diverges at some stage. Because Diaphanopterodea also exhibit oblique cross-veins, it can sometimes be difficult to determine whether an oblique structure occurring between RP and MP is the genuine MA or a cross-vein. Unlike previous authors ( Carpenter 1963, 1992; Béthoux and Nel 2003), Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017) suggested that a full fusion of MA with R / RP occurred in Diaphanoptera Brongniart, 1893 , the type-genus of the family from which the names of the order derives. These authors based their interpretation on vein elevation as observed in the specimen MNHN. F. R 51214, holotype of Diaphanoptera munieri Brongniart, 1893 . However, our observation reveals that rock compression this particular specimen experienced (like several other Commentry specimens) makes it impossible to derive a solid inference on the elevation of elements attributable to MA. In contrast, the specimen MNHN. F. R 51196 [considered conspecific to the specimen MNHN. F. R 51214 by Béthoux and Nel (2003)] is better preserved in that respect. Our observation revealed that the structure regarded as the base of MA by Béthoux and Nel (2003) and as a cross-vein by Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017) is indeed concave, while MA is convex distal to the point where it diverges from RP. This difference in elevation underlies the argument by Prokop and Kukalová-Peck (2017). However, an elevation shift, applying to both MA and CuA, is a general feature of the broader taxon Rostropalaeoptera ( Béthoux 2008). Most decisively, in Eukulojidae , whose wings lack cross-venation, the then undisputable bases of MA and CuA are both concave for a short distance before turning convex, after having approached RP and M, respectively ( Béthoux 2008: fig. 3). The assumption that MA is fused very early with R / RP in Diaphanoptera is therefore unsubstantiated.

MA

Real Jardín Botánico

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

MP

Mohonk Preserve, Inc.

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle