Kodaianella furcata Chang & Chen, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.917.47326 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DEDB8D24-0525-45B1-8F3E-9A97EF23DA37 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB9B5313-A0A2-4F2B-821F-FD5E8B5A342E |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:EB9B5313-A0A2-4F2B-821F-FD5E8B5A342E |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Kodaianella furcata Chang & Chen |
status |
sp. nov. |
Kodaianella furcata Chang & Chen View in CoL sp. nov. Figs 1-13 View Figures 1–13
Type material.
Holotype: ♂, China: Guangxi, Nonggang National Nature Reserve (22°28'N, 106°58'E), 8 May 2011, H Li leg.; paratypes: 5♂♂, same data as holotype (IEGU); 1♂, Guangxi, Nonggang National Nature Reserve (22°28'N, 106°58'E), 7-8 May 2012, H Li and N-N Yang, leg.
Diagnosis.
This species is similar to K. longispina Zhang & Chen, 2010 in appearance, but it differs from the latter in having the phallobase with dorsal lobe bearing one rod-like process near its apical part in lateral view (Fig. 12a View Figures 1–13 ); the phallobase with ventral lobe distinct short, apical part finger-liked in ventral view (Fig. 13c View Figures 1–13 ); and the aedeagus in lateral view, with a forked and hooked process near the apical 1/3 (Fig. 12d View Figures 1–13 ).
Description.
Body length: male 3.94-4.18 mm; forewing: male 3.16-3.45 mm.
Coloration.
General color brown (Figs 1 View Figures 1–13 , 2 View Figures 1–13 ). Vertex, pronotum, and mesonotum (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ) black-brown. Frons (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–13 ) black-brown, with pale yellow verrucae along base and lateral margins. Clypeus (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–13 ) yellow-brown. Compound eyes black-brown, ocelli pale green (Fig. 4 View Figures 1–13 ). Forewings (Fig. 2 View Figures 1–13 ) yellow-brown, with dark spots. Legs yellow-brown, with tips of spines on hind tibiae and tarsi black.
Head and thorax.
Head (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ) including eyes, slightly narrower than pronotum (0.96: 1.00). Vertex (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ) shorter in middle than the width at base (0.43: 1.00), with median carina linear; anterior margin slightly convexly arched; posterior margin obviously obtusely concave. Frons (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–13 ) shorter in middle than the widest breadth (0.60: 1.00); median carina obvious and straight, reaching to 2/3 level of frons. Clypeus (Fig. 5 View Figures 1–13 ) triangular, without median carina. Pronotum (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ) with median carina obscure, lateral carina reaching to the posterior margin. Mesonotum (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–13 ) with median carina obscure. Forewings (Fig. 6 View Figures 1–13 ) 1.60 times as long as maximum breadth; with wide "hypocostal plate"; ScP and RP convergent near base, ScP and RP veins long, nearly reaching apical margin; MP bifurcating two branches near basal 1/3, MP1 forked near apical 1/3; CuA forked into two branches near middle; CuP present, Pcu and A1 united near middle of clavus. Hindwings (Fig. 7 View Figures 1–13 ) with ScP+R and M simple, not forked, CuA forked near apical part, with one vein between R and M, M and CuA1; and Pcu and A11 jointed near apical 1/4, without short transverse vein between Pcu + A11 and A12; A2 simple, reaching to 2/3 of A2 lobe. Spinal formula of hind leg (2)8/8/2.
Male genitalia.
Anal tube (Fig. 9 View Figures 1–13 ) longer in midline than the width (2.49: 1.00) in dorsal view; lateral margins nearly parallel and widest in apical part; apical margin nearly truncated, with unobvious small, angular process near lateral margin. Anal style (Fig. 9 View Figures 1–13 ) stout and long, located at the base 2/5 of anal tube, surpassing the opening of anal pore. Pygofer (Fig. 8 View Figures 1–13 ) irregularly rectangular; dorsal margin slightly broader than ventral margin; anterior margin arched near dorsal 1/3; posterior margin nearly straight. Genital styles (Figs 8 View Figures 1–13 , 10 View Figures 1–13 ) relatively triangular; anterior margin without triangular process; posterior margin with triangular process. Capitulum of genital styles irregularly triangular, with small irregular triangular, relatively long and stout neck (Fig. 11 View Figures 1–13 ). Phallobase (Figs 12 View Figures 1–13 , 13 View Figures 1–13 ) with dorsal lobe cystiform near apical part, with stout rod-like process (Figs 12a View Figures 1–13 , 13a View Figures 1–13 ) in apical 1/6, directed to posterior, with dorso-lateral lobe with short hook-like process (Fig. 12b View Figures 1–13 ), pointed to dorsal margin in lateral view; lateral lobe splitting into two stout branches; ventral lobe membranous, apical part narrow, surface with microvilli in lateral view (Fig. 12c View Figures 1–13 ); ventral lobe in ventral view obviously shorter than dorsal lobe, with apical part projecting into finger-like process in middle (Fig. 13c View Figures 1–13 ). Aedeagus (Figs 12 View Figures 1–13 , 13 View Figures 1–13 ) with long, hooked process near apical 1/3 in ventral view, tip of process directed to ventro-posterior in lateral view (Fig. 12d View Figures 1–13 ); in ventral view, hooked process forked into asymmetrical hooks (Fig. 13d View Figures 1–13 ).
Etymology.
The new species is derived from the Latin word " furcata ", in reference to the aedeagus, which bears a forked, hooked process.
Host plant.
Unknown.
Distribution.
China (Guangxi).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hemisphaeriinae |
Genus |