Vatellus yanomami, Braga, Rafael Benzi & Ferreira-Jr, Nelson, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4111.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16B2726A-8950-4823-A43A-DB91D3B3BA09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6066724 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B176CE26-FFE0-EA5B-01A4-FD8BFBA51B5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Vatellus yanomami |
status |
sp. nov. |
Vatellus yanomami View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 18–34 View FIGURES 18 – 26 View FIGURES 27 – 34 )
Type locality. Brazil, Amazonas State, Barcelos Municipality.
Type-material. Holotype: ♂ ( INPA) “ Brasil, AM, Barcelos, Igarapé do Reginel, #21, 10 /VIII/2009, folhiço com raízes, Ferreira-Jr N.” [01°02’30,98”S 62°50’09,20”W] “ Vatellus yanomami Braga e Ferreira-Jr., DET. BRAGA R.B. 2014” “Htipo” [red plastic label]. Paratypes: 44 ex. ( INPA) “ Brasil, AM, Barcelos, Igarapé do Reginel, #21, 10 /VIII/2009, folhiço com raízes, Ferreira-Jr N.” [01°02’30,98”S 62°50’09,20”W] “ Vatellus yanomami Braga e Ferreira-Jr., DET. BRAGA R.B. 2014” “Ptipo” [red plastic label]; 5 exs. ( DZRJ 5804) “ Brasil, AM, Barcelos, Sítio do Sr. Miranda, Comunidade Ukuki, Poça da mata, trilha para piaçaval, 25/VII/2009, A. Pés” [00°48’00,28”N 63°29’22,92”W]; “ Vatellus yanomami Braga e Ferreira-Jr., DET. BRAGA R.B. 2014” “Ptipo” [red plastic label] “5804” [blue plastic label]; 2 ex. ( DZRJ 5806) “Br, AM, Barcelos Regynel, 1o ordem, A114, Água Branca, 10/VIII/2009, Nessimian J.L.” [01°02’30,98”S 62°50’09,20”W] “ Vatellus yanomami Braga e Ferreira-Jr., DET. BRAGA R.B. 2014” “Ptipo” [red plastic label] “5806” [blue plastic label]; 26 exs. ( DZRJ 5807) “ Brasil, AM, Barcelos, Igarapé da fazenda, #22, 11 /VIII/2009, Folhiço na margem com sedimento, Nessimian J.L.” [01°02’57,70”S 62°49’17,76”W] “ Vatellus yanomami Braga e Ferreira-Jr., DET. BRAGA R.B. 2014” “Ptipo” [red plastic label] “5807” [blue plastic label].
Diagnosis. Ver y large size. Habitus as in Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 26 . Dorsally dark brown, ventrally brown to dark brown. Pronotum densely punctate except for anterior margin and two transverse areas on each side of midline smooth ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); male mesotrochanteres with two incisions each with a well developed setal brush ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ). Ventrite VI with apical lobe produced with a brush of golden setae at apex ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ). Apex of median lobe with a small central incision ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ); dorsoapical margin of lateral lobes with area of dense, fine, elongate setae; curved setae absent ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ).
Description. (Based on holotype). Measures. Total length 6.76 mm; maximum width 3.25 mm; pronotum length 1.16 mm; elytral length 4.80 mm; maximum width of pronotum 2.08 mm.
Habitus ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ). Body outline discontinuous in dorsal view, lateral elytral margins lightly rounded, dorsoventrally moderately flattened.
Coloration ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ). Dorsally dark brown. Ventrally head brown, hypomeron and mesoventrite brown, metaventrite dark brown to almost black; legs with coxae and trochanteres dark brown to almost black, femora, tibiae and tarsi brown; abdominal ventrites brown.
Sculpture and structure ( Figs 19–26 View FIGURES 18 – 26 , 31 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Head surface smooth with fine punctation from clypeus to region between eyes, surface posterior to eyes microreticulate; anterior clypeal margin distinctly produced; eyes relatively small, rounded. Pronotum densely punctate except for anterior margin and two transverse areas on each side of midline smooth, shiny and impunctate; surface between punctures microreticulate; punctures with short, fine, white setae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); pronotum cordate with shagreened margins, transverse sulcus absent. Elytra densely punctate as pronotum, surface between punctures smooth and shiny. Prosternum moderately short, setose; prosternal process broad, medially concave, lateral margins rounded, apex narrowly pointed; mesotrochanteres with two incisions, each with a well developed setal brush; ventral margin of base of mesofemora with brush of weakly developed setae ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); metaventrite coarsely punctate, surface between punctures shiny, smooth, midline area ventrally produced; metacoxae with lateral portion relatively coarsely punctate, medial portion finely and densely punctate, metacoxal lines strongly divergent anteriorly, approximate posteriourly ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); metatrochanteres short, rounded, rectangular-shaped ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ), metatarsal claws finely dentate. Abdominal ventrites finely punctate laterally, surface smooth, shiny; ventrite VI with apical lobe produced, flattened, apically rounded, with a brush of golden setae at apex ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); speleum relatively short, broad basally, sides almost straight, narrow apically, apex strongly bent to venter ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ).
Male genitalia ( Figs 27–30 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Median lobe in lateral view evenly curved, narrowed apically, apex narrowly sharp, without subapical setae, basal portion broad, robust ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ); in ventral view almost straight, narrow, apically with lateral margins evenly converging to rounded apex ( Figs 29–30 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ), apex with a small central incision ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Lateral lobes with apical portion narrow, margins almost parallel, apex rounded, dorsoapical margin with area of dense, fine, elongate setae; curved setae absent ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ).
Intraspecific variation. Small differences in size; total length 6.60–7.24 mm; maximum width 3.00–3.68 mm; pronotum length 1.00–1.16 mm; elytral length 4.80–5.20 mm; maximum width of pronotum 1.95–2.24 mm.
Sexual dimorphism. Male mesotrochanteres with two incisions each with a well developed setal brush ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ); in female mesotrochanteres without incision, with a single brush of setae ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ). Male pro- and mesotarsomeres visibly more expanded respect in female ( Figs 24–25 View FIGURES 18 – 26 ).
Female genitalia ( Figs 32–34 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Gonocoxosternites very broad, robust, apical angle slightly rounded, anterior margin slightly concave, medial margin convex, anterior lobe long and slender ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Gonocoxae elongate, very slender, almost straight, apex relatively narrowly rounded, apodeme elongate and slender ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ). Receptacle semispherical, almost half the size of spermatheca; spermatheca spherical, triangular process large, very broadly expanded ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 27 – 34 ).
Etymology. The species name refers to masculine and feminine noun “ Yanomâmi ”, name of the indigenous people present in the area of origin of the type material.
Taxonomic notes. This species can be distinguished from other members of the genus by its large size, being only comparable to V. sahlbergi ( Sharp, 1882) , from which it differs in several characters. For example, the speleum is abruptly narrowed at the apex and two setal tufts are present on male mesotrochanteres of V. yanomani , whereas in V. sahlbergi the speleum is regularly narrowed and a single setal tuft is present on male mesotrochanteres. The new species also exhibits some characters of the V. grandis clade sensu Miller (2005), such as the dense shagreenation of the pronotum, except for small lateral patches, the anteromedial portion of the metaventrite distinctly swollen ventrally, and a small female receptacle. However, it lacks a distinct tuft of long and curved setae on the dorsoapical margin of the male lateral lobe, this character is present in all species of the V. grandis clade, with exception of V. bifenestratus . The female genitalia resemble those of V. grandis but with a more rounded receptacle, and the male genitalia have similarities to those of V. bifenestratus , although the apex of the median lobe is regularly narrowed, not abruptly narrowed as in V. bifenestratus .
Geographic distribution. So far known only from the Amazonas State in Brazil.
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |