Zalmoxoidea, Sorensen, 1886

Pérez-González, Abel, Ayala-Apaza, Arli G. & Pereira, Maria Paula, 2024, Incidental notes on some Grassatorean (Arachnida: Opiliones) types of the Senckenberg Naturmuseum (SMF) harvestmen collection, Zootaxa 5405 (4), pp. 591-598 : 591-592

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5405.4.7

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FC7BA5C2-FC50-4566-A46E-8F42BF6672AB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10624584

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A706BC60-5707-FFDE-FF16-F9D164F8F84E

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Zalmoxoidea
status

 

Superfamily Zalmoxoidea View in CoL

Family incertae sedis

Type name: Phalangodella aequatorialis Roewer, 1912 .

Specimen examined: Female syntype SMF 9800235 View Materials -RI/235-5 ( Fig. 1 A–D View FIGURE 1 ) from ECUADOR, Esmeralda , Cachabí, herein designated as Lectotype.

Actions: Designation of lectotype and correction of the sex of lectotype.

Remark (I): The term “Cachabí” most likely refers to the Cachabí River or the town of San Javier de Cachaví (1°3’58” N, 78°46’38” W), which is situated in the Esmeralda Province’s San Lorenzo Canton.

Remark ( II): The syntypes of Phalangodella aequatorialis are two specimens, not co-specifics, one much larger than the other. Closer examination of the larger specimen revealed that it is a female and, in contast to the small specimen, fits with the original description ( Roewer 1912) and with the only published figure ( Roewer 1923: 122, fig. 126). Therefore, this specimen is herein designated as the lectotype of Phalangodella aequatorialis Roewer, 1912 . The paralectotype does not correspond to this species, and further studies are necessary to clarify its identity.

Remark ( III): Roewer (1912: 162 and in the label, see Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ) wrongly stated that one of the syntypes was certainly a male when in fact both syntype specimens are females. Even though Roewer did not indicate which specimen he referred to, it is likely that he wrongly sexed the herein designated lectotype. The mistake in sexing the specimen could be related to the fact that the female lectotype exhibits a kind of armature on legs IV in the form of small ventral spiniform apophyses on the ventro-distal tibia ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). This morphology of leg IV is a common sexually dimorphic characteristic of males in Zalmoxoidea , but it is also present (to a lesser degree) in females of some species (pers. obs.).

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF