Paraphytoseius orientalis (Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A243E217-FFBA-6B37-FE08-FD5CB0B90299 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Paraphytoseius orientalis (Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai) |
status |
|
Paraphytoseius orientalis (Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai) View in CoL
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) orientalis Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai 1960: 394 View in CoL .
Paraphytoseius orientalis, Moraes et al. 1986: 105, 2004: 162 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003b:
220, 2007: 53.
Amblyseius ipomeai El-Banhawy 1984: 126 (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry 2003b).
Paraphytoseius multidentatus Swirski & Shechter 1961: 114 View in CoL (synonymy according to Matthysse & Denmark 1981 in Denmark et al. 1999).
Paraphytoseius narayanani Ehara 1967: 67 View in CoL (synonymy according to Chant & McMurtry 2003b).
Mayotte (1) La Réunion Madagascar South Africa Mayotte (1) La Réunion Madagascar South Africa
Characters Characters
(this study) (2) (5) (2) (this study) (2) (5) (2)
Dsl 225 225 – 230 260 270 – 285 st1-st1 40 40 – –
Dsw 150 150 170 197 – 200 st2-st2 49 50 – –
j1 15 10 – 13 15 15 – 18 st3-st3 51 53 – –
j3 30 25 – 33 34 40 – 46 st1-st5 98 95 – 116 – 128
j4 19 18 – 20 18 26 – 34 st4-st4 43 40 – 43 – –
j5 28 25 – 30 28 34 – 40 st5-st5 35 35 – –
j6 34 28 – 35 30 40 – 46 Vsl 105 95 – 103 115 112 – 131
J2 38 33 – 38 35 40 – 46 Vsw ZV2 130 125 – 140 – 139 – 145
J5 11 8 – 13 9 11 Vsw anus 60 50 – –
r3 20 23 – 28 30 26 – 34 gv3 – gv3 15 – – –
R 1 20 23 24 26 – 34 JV5 28 28 – 33 33 34 – 40
s4 44 43 – 48 45 54 – 59 StIV 43 50 – 53 54 54 – 63
S2 43 40 – 45 45 46 – 54 Fdl 20 20 19 –
S4 28 28 – 30 27 31 – 34 No teeth Fd Not visible 3-4? 2 –
S5 20 20 – 23 25 25 – 31 Mdl 20 18 – 20 19 –
z2 38 33 – 37 32 42 – 49 No teeth Md Not visible 2? 1 –
z4 38 33 – 35 38 42 – 49 Shaft 13 13 12 –
z5 16 18 15 20 – 28 Branch 20 – – –
Z1 36 33 – 40 37 40 – 46 Sources of measurements – Madagascar (Identified as Amblyseius bibens , but synonymized by Ueckermann & Loots 1988): Blommers (1973); South Africa:
Z4 44 40 – 45 42 46 – 54
Ueckermann & Loots (1988); –: not provided.
Z5 46 45 – 50 50 54 – 59
This species belongs to the orientalis species group ( Chant and McMurtry 2003b), but according to these authors and Moraes et al. (2007), specimens with shorter setae s4, Z4 and
Z5, and having a distinctly short, thick, spatulate macroseta on genu I belong to the species P. orientalis . This species is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical areas in South America, Africa and Asia. It belongs to a genus included in the large polyphagous generalist group named type III phytoseiid mites ( McMurtry and Croft 1997; McMurtry et al. 2013). Navasero and Navasero (2016) studied the life history of P. orientalis on the broad mite P (. latus ) as prey and reported high predation rates when eggs P of. latus were offered as food, suggesting good potential for the control of this pest. This species was also collected in Mauritius ( Kreiter et al. 2018a; Ferragut and Baumann 2019; Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf 2020b), La Réunion ( Kreiter et al. 2020c) and Vietnam (Kreiter et al. 2020b).
World distribution: Argentina, Brazil, Burundi, India, Japan, Kenya, La Réunion Island, Madagascar Island, Martinique Island, Mauritius Island, Mozambique, Rwanda.
Specimens examined: 3 ♀♀ specimens in total. Coconi, Lycée Agricole (189 m aasl, 12°50 ′ 7 ″ S, 45°8 ′ 11 ″ E), 3 ♀♀ on Capsicum annuum L. ( Solanaceae ), 26/XI/2018.
Remarks: this species was reported by Kreiter et al. (2018a, 2020b, c) and by Ferragut and Baumann (2019) from various places. Morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements fit well with those given by Ferragut and Baumann (2019) and Kreiter et al. (2020b, c). It is described from Asia ( Narayanan et al. 1960) and present in Vietnam (Kreiter et al. 2020b). Paraphytoseius orientalis seems to be more common than P. horrifer in Mauritius Island ( Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf 2020b), whereas the latter is more abundant in Mayotte Island.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paraphytoseius orientalis (Narayanan, Kaur & Ghai)
Kreiter, Serge, Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. & Payet, Rose-My 2020 |
Paraphytoseius orientalis
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 162 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 105 |
Amblyseius ipomeai
El-Banhawy E. M. 1984: 126 |
Paraphytoseius narayanani
Ehara S. 1967: 67 |
Paraphytoseius multidentatus
Swirski E. & Shechter R. 1961: 114 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) orientalis
Narayanan E. S. & Kaur R. B. N. & Ghai S. 1960: 394 |