Neoseiulus teke (Pritchard and Baker)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A243E217-FFB8-6B34-FE08-FF5BB6A2050B |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Neoseiulus teke (Pritchard and Baker) |
status |
|
Neoseiulus teke (Pritchard and Baker) View in CoL
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke Pritchard & Baker 1962: 239 .
Amblyseius teke, Meyer & Rodrigues 1966: 30 ; Moraes et al. 1989a: 83, 1989b: 97.
Neoseiulus teke, Moraes et al. 1986: 98, 2004: 147 View in CoL ; Chant & McMurtry 2003a: 37, 2007: 31. Amblyseius (Amblyseius) bibens Blommers 1973: 111 (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988).
Neoseiulus teke View in CoL belongs to the barkeri View in CoL species group and the womersleyi species subgroup ( Chant and McMurtry 2003a). This species is found in sub-Saharan Africa often associated with Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar) View in CoL , the cassava green mite (CGM). It has been studied for its potential use as a BCA against the CGM. Nwilene and Nachman (1996) studied its reproduction characteristics on M. tanajoa View in CoL . It was more efficient than Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) View in CoL , but seems not efficient enough in field conditions ( Nwilene and Nachman 1996). Quilici et al. (2000) collected this species in La Réunion Island and it was reported recently by Kreiter et al. (2020c).
World distribution: Burundi, DR Congo, Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, La Réunion Island, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe.
Specimens examined: 4 specimens in total, 3 ♀♀ + 1 ♂. L’Abattoir, City Center (15 m
aasl, 12°47 ′ 18 ″ S, 45°16 ′ 21 ″ E), 1 ♀ + 1 ♂ on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L. ( Malvaceae ) with eriophyid mite galls and 2 ♀♀ on Carica papaya L. ( Caricaceae ), 27/XI/2018.
Remarks: measurements of morphological characters of N. teke female and male specimens from Mayotte Island ( Tables 1 and 2) are very close to those specimens from neighbouring countries, especially from specimens of La Réunion Island ( Kreiter et al. 2020c) and various countries in Africa, except for the holotype ( Zannou et al. 2006) and specimens from South Africa which are larger ( van der Merwe 1965).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neoseiulus teke (Pritchard and Baker)
Kreiter, Serge, Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. & Payet, Rose-My 2020 |
Neoseiulus teke
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2007: 31 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 147 |
Chant D. A. & McMurtry J. A. 2003: 37 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 98 |
Blommers L. 1973: 111 |
Amblyseius teke
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & van den Berg H. & Yaninek J. S. 1989: 83 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Yaninek, J. S. 1989: 97 |
Meyer M. K. P. & Rodrigues M. da 1966: 30 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke
Pritchard A. E. & Baker E. W. 1962: 239 |