Amblyseius largoensis (Muma)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/acarologia/20204391 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A243E217-FFB4-6B39-FE08-FE6DB7C602C6 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma) |
status |
|
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma) View in CoL
Amblyseiopsis largoensis Muma 1955: 266 .
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) largoensis, Chant 1959: 96 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) largoensis, Muma 1961: 287 View in CoL .
Typhlodromus largoensis, Hirschmann 1962: 2 .
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) largoensis, Ehara 1966: 22 View in CoL .
Amblyseius largoensis, Swirski & Golan 1967: 225 View in CoL ; Moraes et al. 1986: 17, 2004: 33; Chant
& McMurtry 2004: 208, 2007: 78.
Amblyseius magnolia Muma 1961: 289 (synonymy according to Denmark & Evans 2011). Amblyseius sakalava Blommers 1976: 96 View in CoL (synonymy according to Ueckermann & Loots 1988). Amblyseius amtalaensis Gupta 1977: 53 View in CoL (synonymy according to Gupta 1986).
Amblyseius largoensis View in CoL belongs to the largoensis View in CoL species group and the largoensis View in CoL species subgroup. It is widespread in all tropical and subtropical regions of the world and was the
Mayotte (1) Madagascar Mayotte (1) Madagascar Characters Africa (20) Angola (?) Characters Africa (20) Angola (?)
(this study) (1?) (this study) (1?)
Dsl 320 332 (310 – 347) 347 – 362 320 Gensl Not visible – – –
Dsw 205 217 (200 – 226) 223 – 246 230 Gensw st5 65 65 (59 – 70) – –
j1 15 16 (13 – 21) 19 15 Gensw post. corn. Not visible – – –
j3 18 19 (16 – 24) 19 18 Lisl 15 – – –
j4 8 10 (8 –13) 11 10 Lisw 4 – – –
j5 8 10 (8 –11) 11 10 Sisl 8 – – –
j6 9 12 (10 –13) 12 10 Vsl 103 108 (94 – 115) 109 – 123 105
J2 10 13 (11 –14) 16 12 Vsw ZV2 65 84 (74 – 94) 85 – 92 80
J5 8 8 (8 – 10) 9 8 Vsw anus 68 79 (72 – 86) – –
r3 15 14 (11 – 16) 16 12 gv3 – gv3 25 – – –
R 1 9 11 (8 – 13) 13 12 JV5 29 – 32 – 39 35
s4 15 21 (16 – 26) 19 18 SgeI 20 26 (22 – 30) 28 – 31 –
S2 10 11 (8 – 13) 13 12 SgeII 18 23 (19 – 29) 25 – 26 –
S4 8 10 (8 – 13) 11 10 SgeIII 23 29 (24 – 32) 33 – 39 28
S5 8 9 (8 – 10) 9 10 StiIII 23 23 (19 – 24) 25 – 30 –
z2 13 12 (11 – 13) 13 14 SgeIV 43 42 (35 – 48) 47 – 54 40
z4 10 12 (10 – 13) 13 10 StiIV 35 33 (26 – 40) 38 – 41 32
z5 8 10 (8 – 11) 9 10 StIV 49 52 (42 – 67) 54 – 60 50
Z1 11 13 (13 – 14) 14 – 16 10 Scl 8 6 (5 – 8) – –
Z4 23 31 (22 – 37) 29 – 34 26 Scw 2 13 (13 – 14) – –
Z5 68 67 (53 – 74) 72 60 Fdl 25 23 (23 – 24) – 25 st1-st1 50 – – – No teeth Fd 8 8 8 8 st2-st2 60 63 (59 – 66) – – Mdl 26 27 (27 – 28) – 27 st3-st3 65 – – – No teeth Md 3 3 3 3 st1-st3 50 54 (50 – 58) – – Sources of measurements – Africa ( Benin: 3♀♀; Cameroon: 2♀♀; Ghana: 10♀♀; Kenya: 3♀♀; Mozambique: 1♀; Democratic Republic of Congo: holotype): Moraes et al. (2007) ; st4-st4 75 – – –
Angola: Ueckermann & Loots (1988); Madagascar (Identified as Amblyseius ivoloinae , but synonymized by Ueckermann & Loots 1988): Blommers (1974); –: not provided.
most abundant species collected by Moraes et al. (2000) in French Caribbean Islands and as a potential BCA of Raoiella indica Hirst in La Réunion Island ( Moraes et al. 2012). Using morphometric analyses of 36 characters, molecular analyses and crossing tests, Navia et al. (2014) studied specimens collected in Brazil, La Réunion Island and Trinidad and Tobago to determine whether A. largoensis populations from different geographic origins belong to the same taxonomic entity. Though differences in the lengths of some setae were observed, molecular analyses and crossing experiments indicated that populations from Indian Ocean and America were conspecific. This species was previously recorded from Mauritius Island by Ferragut and Baumann (2019) and Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf (2020b), and Rodrigues Island by Kreiter and Abo-Shnaf (2020a).
World distribution: this species is widely distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions of Africa, America, Asia and the Pacific Islands.
Specimens examined: 17 specimens in total, 8 ♀♀, 4 ♂♂ and 5 im. L’Abattoir,
Dziani lake (23 m aasl, 12°46 ′ 14 ″ S, 45°17 ′ 18 ″ E), 1 ♂ and 2 im. on Phoenix dactyliphera
L. ( Arecaceae ) and 1 ♂ on Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg (Moaceae) 27/XI/2018; L’Abattoir, City Center (15 m aasl, 12°47 ′ 18 ″ S, 45°16 ′ 21 ″ E), 2 ♀♀ and 1 im. on Mangifera indica L. ( Anacardiaceae ), 3 ♀♀ and 2 ♂♂ on Hibiscus rosa-sinensis (Malvaceae) with eriophid mite galls, and 3 ♀♀ and 2 im. on Cordia sebestena (Boraginaceae) , 27/XI/2018.
Remarks: morphological and morphometric characters and all measurements of Mayotte Island specimens fit well with those given in Zannou et al. (2007) for specimens from Africa, Navia et al. (2014) for specimens from Brazil, La Réunion and Trinidad & Tobago and Ferragut and Baumann (2019) for specimens from Mauritius. This is the third more common species of our samplings.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amblyseius largoensis (Muma)
Kreiter, Serge, Abo-Shnaf, Reham I. A. & Payet, Rose-My 2020 |
Amblyseius largoensis, Swirski & Golan 1967: 225
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. & Campos C. B. 2004: 33 |
Moraes G. J. de & McMurtry J. A. & Denmark H. A. 1986: 17 |
Swirski E. & Golan Y. 1967: 225 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseius) largoensis
Ehara S. 1966: 22 |
Typhlodromus largoensis
Hirschmann W. 1962: 2 |
Amblyseius (Amblyseialus) largoensis
Muma M. H. 1961: 287 |
Amblyseius magnolia
Gupta S. K. 1977: 53 |
Blommers L. 1976: 96 |
Muma M. H. 1961: 289 |
Typhlodromus (Amblyseius) largoensis
Chant D. A. 1959: 96 |
Amblyseiopsis largoensis
Muma M. H. 1955: 266 |