Physatocheila veteris Drake, 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A7818EA-FBCE-4597-9557-28C208CAC97A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6609993 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A202791F-FFAD-FFE3-69F7-FF40FDACFD37 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Physatocheila veteris Drake, 1942 |
status |
|
Physatocheila veteris Drake, 1942 View in CoL
( Figs. 8J View FIGURE 8 , 9I View FIGURE 9 , 10I View FIGURE 10 , 11I View FIGURE 11 , 17L View FIGURE 17 , 18L View FIGURE 18 )
Physatocheila veteris Drake, 1942: 10 View in CoL . Holotype: macropterous ♂, Japan: Hokkaido, Sappora [= Japan: Hokkaido, Sapporo-shi, Minami-ku, Jozankei]; USNM.
Physatochila [incorrect subsequent spelling] veteris: Takeya (1951: 20) View in CoL (checklist: eastern Asia).
Physatocheila veteris: Drake & Ruhoff (1965a: 338) View in CoL (catalog); Tomokuni (1987: 117) (distribution); Tomokuni (1988: 652) (distribution); Péricart & Golub (1996: 56) (checklist: Palaearctic); Yamada & Tomokuni (2012: 200) (monograph); Ban (2013: 31) (distribution); Maehara (2013: 167) (distribution); Maehara (2014: 60) (distribution); Yamada & Ishikawa (2016: 432) (checklist: Japan); Ishikawa (2017: 63) (distribution); Nakatani (2019: 92) (distribution).
Specimens examined. Non-types (2 ♂♂ 5 ♀♀) , JAPAN: Hokkaido: Nukabira , 4.viii.1962, leg. Y. Miyatake (1 ♀, KUM) ; Nukabira, Fujigawa Riv. , 14.vi.1967, T. Saigusa (1 ♂, KUM) ; Sapporo, Moiwa , 9.v.1905, leg. S. Mitsuhashi (1 ♀, KUM) . Honshu: Tochigi Pref., Nikko, Kawamata , 5.vi.2013, leg. S. Maehara (1 ♂ 1 ♀, TUA) ; as above but 12.vi.2017 (2 ♀♀, TUA) .
Diagnosis. Recognized among other species of Physatocheila by a combination of the following characters: general color dark brown ( Figs. 8J View FIGURE 8 , 9I View FIGURE 9 , 10I View FIGURE 10 , 11I View FIGURE 11 ); median spine on head extending beyond bases of frontal spines; rostrum reaching posterior margin of metasternum; pubescence on pronotum less than 0.5 times as long as diameter of compound eye; lateral carinae of pronotum nearly parallel to each other throughout their length, not touching outer margin of paranota at anterior end; paranota incompletely covering pronotal disc in anterior part, not touching each other, not concealing median carina of pronotum, not widened posteriorly, not bulged upward in posterior part, not forming a cyst; outer margin of paranotum nearly straight in its entire length; costal area of hemelytron narrower than subcostal area at widest part, less than 0.5 times as wide as discoidal area at widest part, with 2 rows of areolae in its entire length; and subcostal area subhorizontal, with 4 rows of areolae in its entire length.
Description of genitalia. Pygophore ( Figs. 10I View FIGURE 10 , 17L View FIGURE 17 ) compressed dorsoventrally, hexagonal in ventral view, strongly concave at anterior margin of dorsum, elevated at center of venter, smooth on surface, irregularly punctate in middle part of dorsum. Paramere ( Fig. 18L View FIGURE 18 ) expanded in middle part, curved inward in apical part; outer and inner margins covered with pubescence in middle part. Female terminalia ( Fig. 11I View FIGURE 11 ) pentagonal in ventral view, covered with pubescence.
Remarks. Physatocheila veteris closely resembles P. miyatakei in general appearance but can be easily distinguished from it by the following characteristics: hood low-dome-shaped ( Fig. 8J View FIGURE 8 ); lateral carinae of pronotum not touching outer margin of paranota at anterior end; and subcostal area with 4 rows of areolae at widest part.
Although the type locality of P. veteris was indicated as “Sappora, Hokkaido, Japan ” ( Drake 1942), the label on the holotype mentions “Sapporo, Ḯ山渓” [= Japan: Hokkaido, Sapporo-shi, Minami-ku, Jozankei] (http://n 2t. net/ark:/65665/3f08f65a6-6114-49e3-bea7-2b16f69678c5) .
Distribution. Japan (Hokkaido, Honshu).
Host plant. Unknown ( Drake & Ruhoff 1965a).
Biology. Adults were observed from May to September (Tomokuni 1987, 1988; Ban 2013; Maehara 2013, 2014; Ishikawa 2017; Nakatani 2019; present study), and nymphs were collected in July ( Maehara 2013, 2014). The overwintering stage remains unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Physatocheila veteris Drake, 1942
Souma, Jun & Ishikawa, Tadashi 2022 |
Physatocheila veteris: Drake & Ruhoff (1965a: 338)
Nakatani, M. 2019: 92 |
Ishikawa, H. 2017: 63 |
Maehara, S. 2014: 60 |
Ban, T. 2013: 31 |
Maehara, S. 2013: 167 |
Pericart, J. & Golub, V. B. 1996: 56 |
Drake, C. J. & Ruhoff, F. A. 1965: ) |
Physatocheila veteris
Drake, C. J. 1942: 10 |