Malacoangelia
publication ID |
ORI111 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6285268 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9C5C17CD-E362-41A6-296F-3306EFC53E30 |
treatment provided by |
Thomas |
scientific name |
Malacoangelia |
status |
|
Malacoangelia View in CoL Berlese, 1913
Malacoangelia Berlese, 1913, p. 101; 1913a, p. 8; Ewing, 1917, p. 124; Grandjean, 1935, p. 237; 1947, p. 223; 1954, p. 429.
Originally, Berlese described Malacoangelia as having the characters and the habitus of the genus Malaconothrus with the exception of the differently shaped sensillus and bothridium. In a survey of the System of the Acari, Berlese (1913a) classified Malacoangelia together with Lohmannia , Malaconothrus , etc. in the tribe " Michaeliini ", a subdivision of the family Nothridae . Shortly after (Berlese 1916a, p. 176), he created a new tribe " Lohmannini " (a subdivision of the Malaconothridae ) containing the genera Lohmannia , Perlohmannia , Epilohmannia , Medacoangelia , and Eulohmannia . The conformity of Malacoangelia with Malaconothrus or Lohmannia , which Berlese erroneously supposed, is inconceivable to us. Ewing (1917) already, relying on the original description only, correctly placed the genus in the family Hypochthoniidae . Grandjean (1935) again demonstrated the close relationship with Hypochthonius ; the same opinion is found in his later classification of the Enarthronota (1947, 1954).
Medacoangelia remigera is the type and single representative of the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Enarthronota |
Family |