Karaops nitmiluk, Crews, 2023

Crews, Sarah C., 2023, But wait, there's more! Descriptions of new species and undescribed sexes of flattie spiders (Araneae, Selenopidae, Karaops) from Australia, ZooKeys 1150, pp. 1-189 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1150.93760

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A38C5FB6-9F66-4F85-8788-AAA53D21704D

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/183953E4-D180-462D-B4EF-C502FD9E0604

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:183953E4-D180-462D-B4EF-C502FD9E0604

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Karaops nitmiluk
status

sp. nov.

Karaops nitmiluk sp. nov.

Figs 10C-G View Figure 10 , 11A, B, D, E View Figure 11 , 12A-F View Figure 12 , 13A-D View Figure 13 , Maps 1 View Map 1 , 5 View Map 5

Material examined.

Holotype: Northern Territory • ♀ (reared in captivity); Nitmiluk National Park, Baruwei Walk; vic. 14°18'50.36"S, 132°25'23.16"E; 1 Jun. 2016; S. Crews, J. DeJong leg.; on rocks at night; sel_1333; SCC16_071; (MAGNT A004906) GoogleMaps . Paratype: ♀ (reared in captivity); Nitmiluk National Park , Leliyn; vic. 14°10'45.40"S, 132°11'19.58"E; 2 Jun. 2016; S. Crews, J. DeJong leg.; under rocks along trail during the day; sel_1339; SCC16_072; (MAGNT A004895) GoogleMaps . Other material examined: 1♀ (reared in captivity), 3 imm., same data as holotype; sel_1334-1337; (MAGNT A004890-A004893) GoogleMaps • 1♀ (reared in captivity), 3 imm.; same data as paratype; sel_1338, 1340-1342; (MAGNT A004894, A004896-A004898) GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis.

Females of Karaops nitmiluk sp. nov. (Figs 11B, D, E View Figure 11 , 12E View Figure 12 , 13B View Figure 13 ) are most similar to K. jawayway sp. nov. (Figs 13E View Figure 13 , 14B View Figure 14 ) and K. dawara by the tortuous copulatory ducts (Figs 10F View Figure 10 , 13C, D View Figure 13 , 14C-F View Figure 14 ; Crews and Harvey 2011: figs 79, 80) and the unsclerotized part of the copulatory ducts. In K. nitmiluk sp. nov., the copulatory ducts are of mostly uniform diameter throughout their length and are straight or slightly curved anterior to posterior (Figs 10C View Figure 10 , 11E View Figure 11 , 12D View Figure 12 , 13D View Figure 13 ), but in K. jawayway sp. nov., they are wide from the copulatory openings, narrowing posteriorly and curving outward within the first third of their length (Fig. 14D, F View Figure 14 ). In K. nitmiluk sp. nov., the sclerotized portion of the copulatory ducts nearly reaches the epigynal windows where the copulatory openings are located. Additionally, the sclerotized portion of the ducts has coils that largely run anterior to posterior, whereas in K. jawayway sp. nov., they are more than one diameter of the sclerotized ducts away from the epigynal windows, and the ducts are mostly horizontal. In K. dawara , the ducts are horizontal and thin, with longer lengths between turns, and the accessory bulbs are easily visible at the anterior part of the copulatory duct. In K. nitmiluk sp. nov., the accessory bulbs are very difficult to discern (Fig. 10E View Figure 10 ).

Description.

Female (holotype). Total length 4.55. Carapace: length 2.18, width 2.42. Chelicerae: promargin with five teeth, the fourth one, closest to base of fang, larger than others, retromargin with three teeth. Eyes: AER recurved, PER strongly recurved; diameters AME 0.13, ALE 0.10, PME 0.20, PLE 0.26; interdistances AME-PME 0.06, PME-ALE 0.11, ALE-PLE 0.27, PME-PME 0.77, ALE-ALE 1.05, AME-AME 0.37, PLE-PLE 1.34. Sternum: length 1.08, width 1.05. Abdomen: length 2.37, width 2.01. Color (in life/preserved): Carapace: pale brownish yellow with two pairs of dark spots behind ocular area laterally, dark near furrow, dark patch posteriorly, setose with white setae behind eyes, three pairs of dark spots laterally, some whitish patches/more orangish tan with markings less conspicuous. Chelicerae: tan, paturon with a longitudinal curved mark frontally, setae sparse, pale, darkened anteromedially. Maxillae: yellowish brown. Labium: tan, pale distally. Sternum: yellowish. Abdomen: dorsally with anterior reddish brown medial anchor-shaped marking extended about halfway posteriorly, dark markings laterally, two dark chevrons ~ 1/3 from posterior, anteriormost extended to lateral edges, posterior are not/same markings but colors more orangey than yellowish; ventrally yellowish brown. Spinnerets: orangey/yellowish. Legs: grayish in situ (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ), yellowish ex situ (Figs 11D View Figure 11 , 13B View Figure 13 )/yellowish tan (Figs 11A View Figure 11 , 12F View Figure 12 , 13A View Figure 13 ), Cx anteriorly with dark mark, Tr with dark dot, Fm I basally with dark markings anteriorly, proximally with annulation with slightly dusky area, dusky area at Fm-Pt joint, Pt with dark annulation at Pt-Ti joint, Ti with dusky annulation with darker edges, dark annulation at Ti-Mt joint, Mt with dark annulation at Mt-Ta joint, Ta tip dusky; Fm ventrally with flat, white setae enlarged distally, spines dark at base, lightened to orange distally, sometimes darkened at tip (Fig. 11E View Figure 11 ); spination leg I Fm d 1-1-1, pr 1-1-0, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2-2; leg II Fm d 1-1-1, Ti v 2-2-2-2-2-2, Mt v 2-2-2-2; leg III Fm d 1-1-1; leg IV Fm d 1-1-1; leg formula 3241; measurements leg I 9.36 (2.77, 1.07, 2.42, 1.97, 1.13); leg II 10.81 (3.40, 1.01, 2.93, 2.26, 1.21); leg III 11.14 (3.54, 1.09, 2.82, 2.35, 1.34); leg IV 10.38 (3.26, 1.02, 2.55, 2.30, 1.25). Palp: spination Fm d 0-1-3; 2.39 (0.77, 0.38, 0.54, 0.70); claw with five teeth. Epigyne: EP squarish, rounded or truncate anteriorly; MF unsclerotized, diamond to oval shaped, with EWs; LLs distinct, abutting one another posteriorly, COs located at EWs; Endogyne: CDs asymmetrical, unsclerotized at origin, forming one large coil dorsally, sclerotized at point where they coil ventrally, tortuous; ABs are difficult to see; S located posteriorly, FDs long, extended anterolaterally, small pdf (Figs 10C View Figure 10 , 12B-D View Figure 12 , 10G View Figure 10 , 13D View Figure 13 ).

Male. Unknown.

Variation.

(n = 4) The epigyne and endogyne of each individual differ in EW size and shape, MF shape, overall shape of the EP, anterior sclerotized portion of the CDs, the direction of ducts, the number of coils, where and how the unsclerotized portion connects to the sclerotized portion, size and shape of pdf, and size and shape of FDs (Figs 12A-D View Figure 12 , 10F, G View Figure 10 , 13C, D View Figure 13 ). They are different enough that one might consider them separate species had they not been collected from the same place at the same time and did not have independent molecular data supporting the hypothesis that they are the same species. The sample sel_1342 is more reddish brown dorsally/brown. Body length range: 4.40-4.71.

Etymology.

The species name is derived from the name of the type locality. Nitmiluk is the Jawoyn name for Katherine Gorge and means "Cicada Place". Noun in apposition.

Distribution.

Known from only Nitmuluk National Park, Northern Territory.

Natural history.

Karaops nitmiluk sp. nov. occurs in the Pine Creek subregion of the Pine Creek bioregion. It contains eucalypt woodland and monsoon forest patches. The climate is tropical monsoonal, with most rainfall between November and March. Surveys have been conducted for birds, mammals, reptiles and plants, but there is no information on the bioregion’s invertebrate fauna. For information related to rearing, see Suppl. material 2: tables S1, S2). This species has been collected under rocks and on rock walls at night.

Discussion.

The internal ducts and other features of the endogyne are transparent and thus very difficult to see. They were temporarily stained with chlorazol black. Despite the very small sample size, it is notable that the two adult females from Leliyn were penultimate and matured at nearly the exact same time, but there were more months in between the penultimate and adult stages in the specimens from Baruwei. The latter during hot, transitioning to wet, the others, cool, dry and hot, dry to penultimate, and hot and wet to adulthood. Most lived several months after reaching adulthood. The two populations are genetically distinct (Suppl. material 1), but the sample size is small and no consistent morphological differences have been found, so they are described as the same species. Further collecting and rearing of males will help to arrive at conclusions regarding temporal overlap and species boundaries.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Selenopidae

Genus

Karaops