Sofiella takiyae, Domahovski & Alasmar & Cavichioli, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5318.4.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A9D3554-6A11-479B-8E76-3C44AF26615C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8181510 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9B5F87F3-FFB6-FFD3-4294-FAB4FBFDFA7B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sofiella takiyae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Sofiella takiyae View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 1–21 View FIGURES 1–6 View FIGURES 7–13 View FIGURES 14–21 )
Type-locality: S„o José dos Pinhais, State of Paraná, South Brazil.
Measurements (mm). Holotype (male)—4.5. Paratypes — 10 males (4.1–4.7) and 36 females (4.9–5.6).
Color. Dorsum ( Figs 1, 2, 4, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with background black in males and brownish in females, with ivory to yellowish bands and dots as follows: crown with anterior margin yellowish, posterior margin with small yellowish bands; pronotum with transverse irregular band from middle of the disk to the posterior margin; mesonotum with small bands; forewing with three transverse and fragmented bands, one basal, one median and other in the apical third, with several small scattered spots; apex with membrane smoky. Head ( Figs 3, 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ) with frons yellowish with muscle impressions black (males) or brown (females) and with some black or dark brown maculae medially; gena black with rounded yellow spot medially and with a very narrow yellow outer border; clypeus black with two yellow spots basally. Legs ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ) dark brown with yellow maculae.
Male genitalia. Pygofer ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–13 ), in lateral view, short; posterior margin slightly angulated on dorsal third, macrosetae distributed on posterior two-thirds.Valve ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7–13 ), in ventral view, slender and transverse, subrectangular. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–13 ), in ventral view, triangular, narrowing towards apex; outer margins with uniseriate row of macrosetae and long filiform setae at base; in lateral view ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–13 ), plates almost extending as far as pygofer apex posteriorly. Style ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–13 ), in dorsal view, short, attaining basal third of subgenital plate, with conspicuous preapical lobe and apex truncate, foot-like. Connective ( Figs 9, 10 View FIGURES 7–13 ), in dorsal view, short, Y-shaped, arms broad, stem narrow with well developed keel medially, surpassing arms anterad. Aedeagus ( Fig. 12, 13 View FIGURES 7–13 ) symmetrical, in lateral view, apodeme narrow, as long as shaft length; aedeagal shaft directed posteriorly, slightly curved dorsally, with pair of flanges laterally, arising near apodeme base and extending dorsally to apex, serrated apically; pair of apical acute processes directed anteriorly from which pair of lateroventral flanges extends anterad; gonopore subapical. Paraphyses ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 7–13 ) symmetric, in lateral view, with base sclerotized and with two pairs of rami: basal one short and narrow, apical one wide and fused basally, abruptly tapered towards apex, with apex foot-like and directed inwards.
Female terminalia. Sternite VII ( Fig. 14 View FIGURES 14–21 ) with posterior margin produced and slightly truncated. Pygofer ( Figs 14, 15 View FIGURES 14–21 ), in lateral view, produced posteriorly, subtriangular and angled apically; macrosetae located mostly on posterior half and extending anteriorly along ventral margin. Internal sternite VIII membranous. First valvifer ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 14–21 ) ellipsoidal, more expanded dorsally and with acute apex. First ovipositor valvula ( Fig. 16, 17 View FIGURES 14–21 ) well produced, slightly enlarged basally, blade slightly expanded towards apex, the latter acute; ventral interlocking device extending to half length of blade; dorsal sculptured area obliquely striate with very small scale-like projections, starting at basal third and extending to apex. Second valvula ( Fig. 18–20 View FIGURES 14–21 ) long, expanded beyond basal curvature, with dorsal and ventral margins subparallel, apex truncated obliquely, acute on the dorsal portion and with a distinct preapical prominence; dorsal margin with eleven long and very narrow, serrated teeth. Gonoplac ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 14–21 ) 5.5x longer than high; dorsoapical margin long, with half length of gonoplac, straight, almost parallel to ventral margin; ventral margin slightly rounded, distal portion and apex with dentiform cuticular projections; apex subacute.
Material examined. Holotype male: “ Brasil, Paraná, S. [S„o] J. [José] dos\ Pinhais , 25°36’18”S \ 49°11’37”W 880m \ 14.IX.2016 Sweep\ A.C. Domahovski leg.”, ( DZUP) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 1♁, same data as holotype except “ 31. X.2011 ” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 05.XI.2011 ” ( DZUP); 3♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 22. VIII.2012 ” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 07.IX.2015 ” ( DZUP); 3♁, 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 01–30.IX.2015 Malaise-3” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 28.X.2015 ” ( DZUP); 2 GoogleMaps ♁, same data as holotype except “ 27.VIII–03.IX.2016 Malaise-3” ( DZUP); 1♁, 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 14.IX.2016 ” ( MNRJ); 1♁, 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 24.IX.2016 ” ( MZSP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 05. X.2016 ” ( MNRJ); 3♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 01–30.X.2016 ” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 18.XI.2016 ” ( MNRJ); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 07–21.I.2017 ” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 01–28.II.2018 ” ( MZSP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 03–17.XI.2018 ” ( MZSP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 01–31.X.2018 Malaise” ( DZUP); 1♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 01–30.IX.2019 Malaise” ( DZUP); 1 GoogleMaps ♁, same data as holotype except “ 1–30.IX.2020 Malaise” ( DZRJ); 2♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 1– 30.XI.2020 Malaise” ( DZUP); 3♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 1–30.IX.2021 Malaise” ( DZRJ); 3♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 1–31.X.2021 Malaise” ( DZUP); 3♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 1–30.XI.2021 Malaise” ( DZUP); 4♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ 1–30.IX.2022 Malaise” ( DZUP); 2♀ GoogleMaps , same data as holotype except “ XI.2022 ” ( DZUP); 1♁, “ Porto Alegre \ 13,9,44” “ Rio Grande do Sul \ 6753 \ Pe. Buck leg.” ( DZUP) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. We are pleased to name species for our friend and colleague, Sofia’s mother, Prof. Dr. Daniela Maeda Takiya, who has contributed to our knowledge of the Neotropical Cicadellidae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Cicadellini |
Genus |