Phragmatopoma peruensis Hartman, 1944

Chávez-López, Yessica, 2020, New species and new records of Phragmatopoma (Polychaeta: Sabellariidae) from Tropical America, Zootaxa 4845 (3), pp. 301-330 : 315-317

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4845.3.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D737FF5C-63F8-4E80-A605-789A5FEB1B2C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4407391

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/977F915B-FFB1-FFC9-FF7C-FE57FB51FB33

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Phragmatopoma peruensis Hartman, 1944
status

 

Phragmatopoma peruensis Hartman, 1944 View in CoL

Figure 7 View FIGURE 7 A–M

Phragmatopoma peruensis Hartman, 1944: 353–354 View in CoL , pl. 37, figs. 84–85, pl. 39, fig. 99, pl. 41, fig. 104. Type locality: Salaverry , Peru, intertidal.

Phragmatopoma peruensis View in CoL .—Hartman 1959: 474 ( Peru, catalog of the Polychaeta View in CoL ); Achari 1974: 451 (world comparison of sabellariids); Lana & Bremec 1994: 211, fig. 1d (checklist of polychaetes from South America and identification key).

Phragmatopoma virgini View in CoL (not Kinberg, 1867).— Kirtley 1994: 37–40, figs. 2.4.4 ( Peru).

Material examined. Three specimens. Peru: UMAR-Poly-980 ( Puerto Eten , Lambayeque, 6°55’46”S, 79°52’13”W, on rocks between algae and mollusk, February 16, 2013, coll. I. Carmona) GoogleMaps .

Description. Color pattern of preserved specimens. Body pale yellow ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Outer paleae with blade and handle amber; median plume translucent ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 D–E). Middle paleae dark brown to light yellow toward the tip ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 G–H). Inner paleae dark yellow ( Fig. 7I View FIGURE 7 ). Opercular papillae yellowish. Median ridge with brown eyespots ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Tentacles brown ( Fig. 7A, C View FIGURE 7 ). Building organ pale yellow ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Branchiae dark brown ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Parathoracic chaetae yellowish ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 , J–K). Abdominal neuropodia brown purple. Abdominal neurochaetae and uncini translucent ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 L–M). Caudal peduncle dark brown to light brown toward distal part ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ).

Body. Complete specimen of 17 mm total length; parathoracic region 3 mm wide; 36 abdominal segments; caudal peduncle 3.7 mm long ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ).

Operculum. Opercular crown and opercular stalk completely fused. Opercular crown conical and sub-circular, slightly protruding in lateral view ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A–B). Three rows of paleae, only two visible: 62 outer paleae, 30 middle and inner paleae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 A–B). Outer paleae geniculate with a pair of isodont teeth slightly curved; flat blade twice as long as than wide, with dorsal surface smooth and ventral one serrated; median plume short, ¼ as long as blade, sub-quadrangular, twice longer than wide, smooth and flat ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ). Middle paleae strongly geniculate with straight peak, slightly concave, rough surface with transversal thecae; sub-quadrangular nape, straight, margin serrated, wider than peak, 1/3 as long as peak; chin slightly wider than long, margin smooth; blunt tip slightly falcate, with smooth margin ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 G–H). Middle paleae of different sizes depending on their position in the crown, larger dorsally and decreasing in size ventrally. Inner paleae strongly geniculate with serrated peak straight, almost eight times longer than wide; nape smooth; tip without apparent filaments ( Fig. 7I View FIGURE 7 ). Papillae small and oval. Oral tentacles unbranched. Median ridge unclear, tissue of opercular stalk damaged; marginal eyespots present, ¼ as long as opercular stalk ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Median organ absent. Building organ’U’- shaped ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ).

Thorax. Chaetiger 1 with a pair of neuropodial cirrus, bipinnate chaetae ( Fig. 7C View FIGURE 7 ). Chaetiger 2 with three pairs of conical cirrus, bipinnate chaetae and a pair of branchiae.

Parathorax. Three parathoracic segments ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Chaetigers with a pair of branchiae. Notopodia with lanceolate chaetae interspersed with small capillary chaetae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 J–K). Neuropodia with lanceolate chaetae interspersed with small lanceolate chaetae ( Fig. 7F View FIGURE 7 ); neurochaetae thinner than notochaetae.

Abdomen. Segments with a pair of branchiae decreasing in size towards posterior segments; absent in the last four chaetigers ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ). Neurochaetae verticillate of different length ( Fig. 7M View FIGURE 7 ). Notopodia with a series of uncini with seven pairs of teeth ( Fig. 7L View FIGURE 7 ).

Caudal region. Caudal peduncle elastic, rough, with annulated appearance but without segmentation, and as long as 11 posterior segments ( Fig. 7A View FIGURE 7 ).

Tubes. Lost.

Variation. Body measurements varied from 13–17 mm total length and parathoracic region 2.5–3 mm wide (n= 3 spec.). The abdominal segments varied from 30–36. Two specimens with almost all outer paleae with lacerate plume, possibility broke, with rectangular and wide sections ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ).

Habitat. Intertidal, template waters.

Distribution. Hartman (1944) described Phragmatopoma peruensis from Salaverry, Peru. These specimens were collected in Puerto Eten, Lambayeque, Peru, expanding its distribution ~180 kilometers to south ( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 ).

Remarks. The diagnostic features of P. peruensis are the lack of chaetae in the first segment, outer paleae with flat plume and rounded edge, and the length in adult individuals less than 10 mm. My specimens have chaetae in the first segment and are larger than 10 mm, but the shape of paleae is the same. Kirtley (1994) revised the type material of P. peruensis and he concluded P. virgini , a species of Chile, and P. peruensis were synonyms.

Our specimens identified as P. peruensis have outer paleae with blade curved ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 D–E) and not straight and flat as those in P. virgini ( Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ); lateral teeth slightly curved ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 ) and not straight ( Fig. 6I, M View FIGURE 6 ); and median plume oval and smooth, absent in Johansson’s (1926) and Hartman’s (1944, Fig. 6I View FIGURE 6 ) specimens, but possibly similar to the ones revised by Kirtley (1994, Fig. 6J View FIGURE 6 ). The middle paleae of P. peruensis and P. virgini differed principally by the nape and tip morphology; straight nape and slightly curved tip in P. peruensis ( Fig. 6L View FIGURE 6 , 7G View FIGURE 7 ), and straight ( Hartman 1944) or decurrent nape ( Kirtley 1994) with curved tip in P. virgini ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 G–H, K). The number of uncini teeth varied in both species, being seven pairs in P. peruensis ( Fig. 7L View FIGURE 7 ), not six pairs as in P. virgini . The distribution of both species also is an important factor; P. peruensis is a tropical species, while P. virgini is a polar species. So, the synonymy cannot be sustained and consequently, P. peruensis must be regarded as a distinct species.

Phragmatopoma peruensis is similar to P. moerchi in the presence of translucent median plume; oval and smooth in P. peruensis ( Fig. 6N View FIGURE 6 , 7D View FIGURE 7 ), and rectangular and lacerate in P. moerchi ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). This characteristic could be similar in both species as some specimens of P. peruensis have median plume lacerated (possibly due to abrasion) ( Fig. 7E View FIGURE 7 ); however, in P. peruensis the outer paleae have isondont teeth, and not heterodont as P. moerchi . Also, in P. peruensis , the middle paleae have a sub-quadrangular nape, 1/3 as long as peak, with sharp tip slightly curved ( Fig. 6L View FIGURE 6 , 7G View FIGURE 7 ), in contrast with sub-circular ( Hartman 1944) or sub-quadrangular nape ( Johansson 1926), ¼ as long as peak, with sharp tip falcate ( Johansson 1926) or slightly elevated ( Hartman, 1944) present in P. moerchi ( Fig. 6O View FIGURE 6 ). The inner paleae are thinner in P. moerchi ( Fig. 6P View FIGURE 6 ), 16–17 times longer than wide ( Johansson 1926, Hartman 1944), than in P. peruensis , eight times than longer than wide ( Fig. 7I View FIGURE 7 ). As in the case of P. virgini , the re-description of P. moerchi is necessary to compare its morphology with that of the other species of Phragmatopoma .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Sabellida

Family

Sabellariidae

Genus

Phragmatopoma

Loc

Phragmatopoma peruensis Hartman, 1944

Chávez-López, Yessica 2020
2020
Loc

Phragmatopoma virgini

Kirtley, D. W. 1994: 37
1994
Loc

Phragmatopoma peruensis

Lana, P. C. & Bremec, C. S. 1994: 211
Achari, G. P. K. 1974: 451
1974
Loc

Phragmatopoma peruensis

Hartman, O. 1944: 354
1944
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF