Cyclorhiza eteonicola Heegaard, 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4579.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A4015309-D9B3-4BB7-ABCB-B88A1F8CE5FC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5927034 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/97720E2D-FFF6-D602-CBF7-BD8901EFF2F2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2019-04-12 07:29:45, last updated 2025-02-13 20:11:40) |
scientific name |
Cyclorhiza eteonicola Heegaard, 1942 |
status |
|
Cyclorhiza eteonicola Heegaard, 1942 View in CoL
Material examined: 1 ovigerous ♀ from Eteone spetsbergensis Malmgren, 1865 , 3697 Svalbard, Adventfjorden, Stn 5-4 (78° 13’00”N, 15° 13’00”E), depth 30-60 m, 0 8 September 2011; collected by A. Sikorski; NHMUK Reg. No. 2016.520.
Differential diagnosis. Adult female body comprising ectosoma connected to endosoma via short stalk. Ectosoma of mature female 2.1 times longer than maximum width (length 0.93 mm, maximum width 0.44 mm); tapering posteriorly. Ectosoma bearing antennules, antennae and maxillipeds typical for genus; lacking any vestige of trunk limbs and caudal rami. Anus lacking. Genital apertures paired, located anteriorly on underside of ectosoma. Egg sacs 4.55 mm long: egg arrangement multiseriate with about 5 longitudinal rows visible in any view ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ); eggs spherical, mean diameter 92 µm (range 84 to 104 µm). Stalk short and broad, connecting to endosoma within host. Endosoma comprising 2 elongate rootlets penetrating body cavity of host.
Remarks. Heegaard (1942) based his original description on two females found on Eteone longa collected in sand on an island beach outside Trondheim fjord (western Norway). It was subsequently reported from the east coast of North America by Lützen (1964b) on E. longa . The female recorded here was collected from Eteone spetsbergensis , a new host, and it was attached in the mid-body region of its host ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Cyclorhiza eteonicola was reported from UK waters by O’Reilly & Geddes (2000), who found 5 non-ovigerous females on E. longa near Holy Island, off the coast of Northumberland. However, O’Reilly (2000) subsequently concluded that this material could equally be attributed to C. megalova since egg size is diagnostic and these specimens were non-ovigerous.
Heegaard, P. E. (1942) Cyclorhiza eteonicola n. gen., n. sp., a new parasitic copepod. Kongelige Norske Fidenskabernes Selskabs Forhandlinger, 15 (14), 53 - 54.
Lutzen, J. (1964 b) Parasitic copepods from marine polychaetes of eastern North America. Naturaliste Canadian, 91, 255 - 267.
O'Reilly, M. (2000) Notes on copepod parasites of phyllodocid polychaete worms in Scottish waters; including the first UK records of the Mediterranean copepod Phyllodicola petiti (Delamare Deboutteville & Laubier, 1960). Glasgow Naturalist, 23, 39 - 44.
FIGURE 10. Pholoicola chambersae gen. et sp. nov. A, adult female with 3 males attached, ventral; B, female, dorsal; C, detached egg sac; D, adult male, lateral view showing position of developing paired spermatophores; E, adult male, ventral; F, cephalothorax of male, lateral view showing thickened frontal region and clawed limb; G, spermatophore; H, last male copepodid stage, antennule; I, antenna; J, maxilliped. Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm, B–C, 250 µm, D–E, 50 µm, F–H, 25 µm, I–J 10 µm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
1 (by plazi, 2019-04-12 07:29:45)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-12 07:35:47)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-07-24 12:04:03)
4 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-07-30 09:25:58)
5 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-07-30 09:37:16)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-25 22:54:24)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-29 11:07:35)
8 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-31 10:45:34)
9 (by plazi, 2023-10-30 13:13:02)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-10-31 02:42:11)
11 (by ExternalLinkService, 2024-11-26 02:12:00)